• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Former GIC Economics Yeoh And Oppie Terry Caught Lying! Anyhow Say PAP And HDB Make Money From Land Sales!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
1665792677394.png


SINGAPORE: A correction direction has been issued to alternative news website The Online Citizen (TOC) and Mr Yeoh Lam Keong, a former chief economist of Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC, after they posted false and misleading statements about HDB’s deficits and Singapore’s past reserves.

Mr Yeoh published two Facebook posts on Oct 4, referring to the parliamentary reply from the National Development Minister to Mr Leong Mun Wai's question on HDB incurring an estimated development loss of about S$270 million from the Central Weave @ Ang Mo Kio Build-to-Order (BTO) project.

In a media release on Friday (Oct 14), the Ministry of National Development (MND) said Mr Yeoh's posts falsely convey that HDB will not incur a loss of about S$270 million from the project, and that the Government is free to sell state land at nominal or much lower cost than its fair market value.

"The Online Citizen (TOC) subsequently carried an article on the same day echoing the points raised in Yeoh’s Facebook posts," said MND.

On Oct 5, TOC published a second article headlined “Singapore’s reserves substantially profits from S$500m land sales in AMK BTO”.

The article claimed that Minister for National Development Desmond Lee’s parliamentary reply alluded to "profits being made from the land sale by the government" and that "such profits would go to the reserves", said the ministry.

"The headline falsely conveys that the Government’s sale of land to HDB for the AMK BTO project will lead to an increase in Singapore’s reserves."

Recipients of a correction direction under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) are required to insert a notice against the original post or article, with a link to the Government’s clarification.

Mr Yeoh and TOC have added correction notices to the post and articles in question.

MND said that the losses incurred by HDB are "accurate and real", adding that the agency's deficits are covered using funding from the annual Budget, which is raised from taxes and other revenue streams.

"Real money is involved, and this is certainly not an 'accounting sleight of hand'," said MND.

It stressed that state land is part of Singapore's past reserves, and is not part of the assets that the Government can use as it wishes.

"When HDB requires land to develop flats, the land has to be taken out of the past reserves. HDB has to purchase the land by paying fair market value for the land, and the money goes into the past reserves. The estimated land cost for Central Weave @ AMK is about S$500 million," MND said.

"The Government cannot sell state land at nominal or much lower cost than its fair market value without the President’s approval, as doing so would constitute a draw on past reserves."

Singapore's past reserves are protected by the Constitution for the benefit of current and future generations, noted MND.

"The Government cannot sell state land at nominal or much lower cost than its fair market value without the President’s approval, as doing so would constitute a draw on past reserves," it said, adding that there is an established process to determine the fair market value of land.

"Neither the Government nor the past reserves profit from land sales," MND said.

"For the Central Weave @ AMK BTO project, HDB will pay the Government fair market value for the land, estimated to be about S$500 million. This money will be paid into the past reserves, but does not result in a net increase in the past reserves."

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...cits-past-reserves-yeoh-lam-keong-toc-3008241
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
PAP behaves just like CCP. Fuck PAP. Vote PAP out. :FU:

I dare say many samsters here support the CCP for being a strong government to the chinks, turning a third world chinkland into a first world Singapore but on a larger scale.
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP behaves just like CCP. Fuck PAP. Vote PAP out. :FU:
Yu can't.

No oppies are even allowed to contest as many constituencies as pap-piglets.

i didn't even start with other state apparatuses under pap-piglets control.

Yu need an armed revolution.


Coolie gene peasant prostitute whore harlot rickshaw puller nation hasn't got it in them.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
We can believe the PAP govt is infested with blood drinking pedophiles. Issue a 'correction order' for that. :rolleyes:
 

ChanRasjid

Alfrescian
Loyal

CPTMiller

Alfrescian
Loyal
Common On! Is it rocket science to just take away land cost as Leong Mun Wai suggested. HDB is NOT selling flats as a commercial enterprise. Let the citizens know just the construction cost.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid,
"Einstein's E=mc2 Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com
If land cost form a majority cost amount in the Calculation. How can just take away? So to show more profit hdb ?? This cannot be lah
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The SLA makes money from land sales. That is never in doubt.

What is the exact relationship between SLA, HDB, property developers and the PAP govt... the jury is still out.

This is a totalitarian shithole with zero oversight. The 'regulators' are more often than not part of the problem. Refer to SGX.
 

Singapore Dancing Spirit

Alfrescian
Loyal
What is the catch??

There were five million-dollar transactions in non-mature estates in November,
HDB Prices were up 10 per cent year on year despite the cooling measures??
 

mahjongking

Alfrescian
Loyal
wtf is a 'correction direction'? if that word is even remotely possible
FUCK PAP and FUCK CHEEBYE LOONG.....this sentence more straightforward
 

birdie69

Alfrescian
Loyal
Common On! Is it rocket science to just take away land cost as Leong Mun Wai suggested. HDB is NOT selling flats as a commercial enterprise. Let the citizens know just the construction cost.

Best regards,
Chan Rasjid,
"Einstein's E=mc2 Invalid"
http://www.emc2fails.com
Indranee will reply you that it is meaningless to disclose so much details in the costings.
 

Singapore Dancing Spirit

Alfrescian
Loyal
HDBvalues have skyrocketed since the pandemic began. From 2020, prices rose very high. Even after accounting for recent price drops, HDB prices have increased year on year. This level of growth was unprecedented and unsustainable. At some point it should slow down.

The HDB market showed resilient growth despite curbs. This is because SG has a housing shortage as the immigrants in SG is all time PEAK. PAP Government does not have a courage or courtesy to give the breakdown on number of residents, PR, CECA and foreign workers.

This statistics data is very critical for the next GE as I believe we have crossed the 10M mark in SG.
 
Top