• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Five National Stadiums not enough to hold jobless fair

downgrader

Alfrescian
Loyal
I warned two years ago but people say I am a loser

So now I have extra 300,000 friends come 2010

KNN, now not just serenading one or two poor souls, I can host a rock concert and 5 National Stadiums not enough


http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/Singapore/Story/STIStory_328492.html

A NEW Credit Suisse report has predicted an astonishing 300,000 jobs could be lost in Singapore this year and next.

Most of the affected would be foreigners, who would then have to leave the country, leading to a drop in Singapore's population, it said.

But other economists and industry body heads say the Credit Suisse figure is extreme, even in an unprecedented crisis such as this one.

Monday's report was written by Singapore-based Credit Suisse economists Cem Karacadag and Kun Lung Wu.

They estimated that notwithstanding government action, a deep, economy-wide recession will mean that 160,000 jobs could be lost in the services sector, another 100,000 from manufacturing and about 40,000 in construction over this year and next.

Most of the job losses would be from the 725,000 new jobs created over the past five years and were filled mainly by foreigners, who make up a quarter of the population here.

'As harsh as our assumptions may seem, they only imply that the economy gives up all of the jobs it created in 2008 and a portion of the new jobs in 2007,' they wrote.

Of the total, 200,000 would be foreigners and permanent residents (PRs) who, assuming they leave Singapore, would reduce its population by around 160,000 to 4.68 million.

The drop in population would have serious implications for any economic recovery as it would lead to a fall in private consumption, a surge in unemployment to 5.6 per cent in 2010 - it was 2.2 per cent last September - and a plunge in residential property prices.

The figures represent a loss of about 10 per cent of Singapore's workforce of just under three million. By comparison, the Asian financial crisis led to job losses of over 30,000, or about 1.4 per cent of the workforce.

However, other economists say the numbers are far too bearish - even given the severity of the global crisis. OCBC economist Selena Ling said: 'The socio-economic implications of that would be severe... The figures discount the Government policy responses which would kick in before we get to that stage.'

CIMB-GK economist Song Seng Wun said: 'Our labour growth has been well above trend... so job losses of that magnitude are not unimaginable.

'But the Government has indicated that it is willing to dip into the reserves, and it has shown a strong response to the crisis right from the word go.'

Still they believe that in a worst case scenario, job losses here could reach 100,000.

President of the Singapore Manufacturers' Federation Renny Yeo also disputed the numbers. He said Singapore has seen growth in higher-end manufacturing industries such as biotech, and renewable energy which are not as susceptible to a dip in consumer demand. The manufacturing sector employs about 230,000.

The report comes just days before the Budget announcement on Thursday, which will set the tone for how the Government plans to tackle a worsening recession.

In Parliament on Monday, ministers faced questions from MPs over the job market. Acting Minister for Manpower Gan Kim Yong said that job losses this year could exceed 30,000, while Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang said more than 30,000 new jobs would be created this year.
 

downgrader

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,315238,00.html?

Published January 21, 2009

Many foreigners tipped to lose jobs
Credit Suisse estimates number could reach 200,000


By TANG WEN EN

Email this article
Print article
Feedback

EXPECTED job losses will trigger a big drop in the number of permanent residents (PRs) and foreigners in Singapore, says Credit Suisse, estimating that the figure could rise to 200,000. And this will have a ripple effect on the economy, causing private consumption, employment and the property market to slide.


Of the 546,700 foreigners and PRs (which include foreign construction labourers) who moved to Singapore between 2003 and 2008, 89 per cent filled new jobs here. Losing these jobs would give them little incentive to remain.

In the services sector, Credit Suisse (CS) analysts reckon 50,000 jobs will be lost by foreigners and PRs this year and a further 50,000 next year. This equates to 40.5 per cent of the 247,000 services jobs filled by foreigners and PRs between 2004 and the third quarter of 2008.

Projections are similarly bleak for manufacturing, where CS forecasts the loss of 50,000 jobs in 2009 and 20,000 in 2010. This equates to 42.6 per cent of the 164,400 new manufacturing jobs filled by foreigners and PRs from 2004 to Q308.

In construction, 30,000 jobs filled by foreigners and PRs are estimated to be lost in 2010, a 40.9 per cent loss of jobs that were created from 2004 to Q308.





Job losses in the various sectors can be attributed to Singapore's skills dependency. The country's natural resources are scarce or non-existent and the economy is fuelled by people. As the global economy slows, fewer imports are consumed and fewer exports are demanded, reducing the employment needs of companies engaged in either.

Consolidation in financial services and business services, says CS, could also contribute to significant job losses in the services sector.

CS acknowledges that these estimates might seem harsh, and reasons that employment would still be above what it was at the end of 2006; the figures only indicate that the economy will lose as many jobs as it created in 2008 and a portion of the new jobs in 2007, which would be consistent with the fall in real output to a level between 2006 and 2007.

CS also expects departures to follow job losses with a few quarters' lag, which could ease a possible shock in the fall of the population.

CS says the exit of foreigners and PRs could cut the island's population by 4 per cent. And this will take a big bite out of the residential property market. It expects a 40 per cent drop in prices from their 2008 peak, as vacancy rates rise to an unprecedented 15 per cent. Additionally, the fall in capital values will make homeowners feel worse off, causing them to cut back on consumption.

According to CS research, the average pay in the services industry is higher than that in the manufacturing and construction industries, particularly in financial intermediation, where average monthly earnings were $6,768 in 2007, as compared to the average of $3,764 in manufacturing and $2,646 in construction. Job losses in services would therefore result in a more than proportionate fall in private consumption.

Furthermore, as foreigners and PRs leave, they will take their spending power with them, sparking a possible 1-2 per cent cut in consumption growth in 2009 and 2010.

The Singapore government is unlikely to create incentives for people, especially foreigners and PRs, to buy property, after ruling out measures to ease the housing slump, says CS.

According to a recent report by Citi Investment Research, tomorrow's Budget is unlikely to reinstate a deferred payment option for property.

Furthermore, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has said the Budget is designed to 'protect jobs' and will 'introduce measures to help (viable companies) with their business costs'. As a result, Citi reckons any measures on property will likely focus on the commercial and industrial segments, not residential.

Singaporean citizens are not spared from the crunch. CS estimates that 100,000 of the jobs filled by Singaporeans from 2004 to Q308 might be lost, increasing the unemployment rate to 5.6 per cent from its relatively low 1.9 per cent in Q3 2008. It would be the highest level since 1986, where it peaked at 6.5 per cent.

In order to ease unemployment, the government has plans to hire 7,500 new teachers and 4,000 healthcare workers. However, CS believes that the government sector will probably be unable to expand by much.

And while the integrated resort (IR) projects might create up to 30,000 jobs in 2010, CS reckons that this would not substantially change market conditions for foreigners and PRs, not compensating for the predicted population loss.
 

eeoror88

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are many job openings at the shipyards. Latest I heard, they are paying 6 to 8 months of bonus. Not joking.
 
Top