• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Feer REFUSES to Yield to Old Fart's Tyranny

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Feer to appeal defamation ruling
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->THE Far Eastern Economic Review (Feer) will appeal against a High Court ruling that the weekly magazine had defamed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.
The Straits Times learned that Feer has filed a 'notice of appeal' against the ruling that its publisher and editor defamed the two Singapore leaders in a July 2006 article.
A notice of appeal is a document filed in court to begin an appeal. In Singapore, the deadline to file is within a month of the ruling, which was released as a written judgment on Sept 23.
The Lees had in August 2006 sued Feer's publisher, Review Publishing, and its editor Hugo Restall, for defaming them in an article headlined Singapore's 'Martyr' Chee Soon Juan.
The Hong Kong-based journal argued in its defence that the piece by Mr Restall was based on fact and fair comment, and that it concerned matters of public interest.
But the judgment by Justice Woo Bih Li said Feer's defences failed or did not apply in Singapore. He also said there was no doubt that the defamatory words in the article referred to the two leaders.
The Lees have been awarded damages, which will be assessed at a later date. Their legal team is led by Senior Counsel Davinder Singh of Drew & Napier. Review Publishing and Mr Restall are represented by Mr Peter Low of Colin Ng & Partners.
 

DIVISION1

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is irrational behavior. The verdict was clear. A repeat only incurs more monetary expenses undertaken and the courts may question the intentions of FEER.
 

fanta

Alfrescian
Loyal
FEER should just simply not publish in Singapore. In the long run, it will hurt Singapore.
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
FEER has all along a hidden agenda to undermine the interest of Singapore.This is obvious to all. There's no need to support its publication and sympathise with it. Good riddance to garbages.
 

tomoko

Alfrescian
Loyal
There's no need to support its publication and sympathise with it

It's not a question of support. FEER does have good articles and editorials in it.

If it's garbage, old fart won't be bothered to sue FEER.
 
Top