• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Federal Reserve Cannot Account for $9 Trillion

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Federal Reserve Cannot Account for $9 Trillion
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PXlxBeAvsB8&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PXlxBeAvsB8&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:30 PM

By: Julie Crawshaw


The Federal Reserve apparently can't account for $9 trillion in off-balance sheet transactions.


When Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Orlando) asked Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman of the Federal Reserve some very basic questions about where the trillions of dollars that have come from the Fed's expanded balance sheet, the IG didn't know.


Worse, nobody at the Fed seems to have any idea what the losses on its $2 trillion portfolio really are.


"I am shocked to find out that nobody at the Federal Reserve is keeping track of anything," Grayson says.


Grayson asked Coleman if her agency had done any research into the decision not to save Lehman Brothers, which “sent shockwaves through the entire financial system,” Coleman said it had not.


“What about the $1 trillion plus expansion of the Federal reserve’s balance sheet since last September?” Grayson asked.


“We have different connotations,” Coleman replied. “We’re actually conducting a fairly high-level review of the various lending facilities collectively.”


Translation: Nobody at the Fed knows where the money went.


Do you know what who got the $1 trillion or more in the Fed's expansion of its balance, Grayson pressed.


"I do not know. We have not looked at this specific area at the particular point on that specific review," Coleman answer.


What about the trillions of off-balance transactions since last September, Grayson asked.


Coleman demurred again, saying the IG does not have jurisdiction to audit the Federal Reserve.


Grayson pointed out that it was the inspector general's job to audit such spending and asked again if the office had done any investigation at all.


Coleman's answer: Not enough yet to even respond. "We are in not a position to say if there losses."


Grayson concluded, "I am shocked to find out that nobody at the Federal Reserve, including the inspector general, is keeping track of this."


Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says the bank is working on ways to rein in the massive balance sheet commitments.


"A majority of the members who made these projections just recently took 2 percent as being an appropriate number" for inflation, Bernanke said Monday.


"Somewhere between 1-1/2 to 2 percent is basically the number that our committee has individually stated is the appropriate medium-term inflation rate.


"To achieve that we need to demonstrate that we will be able to exit from the balance sheet position that we currently have, and have been working on this intensively," Bernanke said in response to questions after a speech to a conference organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reported by Reuters.
 
Top