• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Fare increase COULD HAVE BEEN 51.5% instead of 2.2% (Sinkies song bo?)

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal

Train, bus fare formula will continue to exclude drop in ridership due to Covid-19: PTC​

Public transport ridership was around 60 per cent of pre-pandemic levels in September. This is likely to remain the case as people continue working from home.
Public transport ridership was around 60 per cent of pre-pandemic levels in September. This is likely to remain the case as people continue working from home.PHOTO: ST FILE
Kok Yufeng and Clement Yong
  • PUBLISHED
    NOV 3, 2021, 8:56 PM SGT
FACEBOOKTWITTER



SINGAPORE - The way that bus and train fares are calculated next year will continue to be adjusted to exclude the exceptionally sharp fall in ridership seen during the Covid-19 pandemic, said the Public Transport Council (PTC).
PTC chief executive Tan Kim Hong said on Wednesday (Nov 3) that the council will adopt the same principle as it did this year when calculating the network capacity factor (NCF) for next year's annual fare review.
The NCF - which was introduced to the fare formula in 2018 and measures the distance covered by bus and train trips versus usage - is meant to account for the change in operating costs arising from adjustments to public transport network capacity.
For this year's review, the PTC considered only the month of January 2020 when deriving the NCF as it was the only month when ridership was not affected by the pandemic.
The PTC excluded the other 11 months of 2020 in its calculations.
This resulted in a 2.2 per cent increase in fares this year, rather than a 51.5 per cent increase if the full year of 2020 was factored in.


The current fare formula, which is valid until next year, also factors in core inflation, energy prices, productivity and wage growth.
Mr Tan said at a press conference that ridership in 2021 is still affected by the pandemic. "We are still monitoring the data and the same principle will be used to exclude the periods that are affected."

Ridership was around 60 per cent of pre-pandemic levels in September. This is likely to remain the case as people continue working from home.
Meanwhile, energy prices have spiked and wages continue to increase.

Asked about the likelihood of another fare hike next year, Mr Tan said the fare formula provides a cap on fare adjustments that can be made each year.
In the event of a higher cap, 5 per cent for instance, the PTC is not obliged to grant the full amount and will look at the prevailing situation.
With the current fare formula up for review next year, the council was also asked what changes could be made to the formula.

PTC chairman Richard Magnus was coy about what the new fare formula could include. "The broad direction... is to really look at how we can arrive at a comfortable balance despite the tensions (between affordability and cost)," he said.

The PTC has noted the growing phenomenon of people working from home, but the long-term trend is still not clear and it does not mean that people will not travel on public transport for other reasons in future, he added.
Public transport fare hike: PTC says unable to keep deferring increases | THE BIG STORY

MORE ON THIS TOPIC​

Income ceiling raised so more households can receive public transport vouchers

Public transport fares to rise by 3 to 4 cents for adults from Dec 26

If rising costs and lower ridership are indeed the new normal, Mr Magnus said public transport operators will need to relook how they can generate more revenue and cut down costs.
Mr Tan said a fall in peak-hour demand could be an opportunity for operators to improve financial viability as they adjust capacity to be more cost-efficient. They could also look into bulk buying, automation and increasing energy efficiency to reduce costs further.

He added that the fare revision is not meant to fully offset operating costs, but to help cover part of it during this pandemic.

Asked why taxpayers have been keeping operators afloat via $2 billion in subsidies each year, Mr Magnus said public transport is a public good. Allowing market forces to dictate fares would mean higher fare prices, he added, citing public transport fares in London.

"There is a social consideration here that we have to price the system such that it does not deny any Singaporeans from travelling (on public transport)," Mr Tan said.

MORE ON THIS TOPIC​

Commuters disappointed at public transport fare hikes; experts say next increase could be more

LTA deficit widens as fare revenue shrinks on back of Covid-19 pandemic

Operators SMRT and SBS Transit both applied for the full 2.2 per cent fare increase.
SMRT Trains president Lam Sheau Kai said the firm is grateful for the support given to it.

Ms Tammy Tan, SBS Transit's senior vice-president for corporate communications, said the fare hike will help the firm defray cost increases that are unsustainable in the long run, including those incurred from stepped-up cleaning and disinfection schedules due to the pandemic.
yffare03-ol_online-211103-publictransportfarerevision.jpg


Join ST's Telegram channel here and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
the pap new normal is back. plenty of prices increases for 2022.

Cheng hu bo lui liao! So many 'freebies' given out over the past couple of years: vaccines, tokens, masks, oximeters, grocery vouchers, Rediscover vouchers etc. It's time to take everything back. :biggrin:

A nation of sheep deserves a government of wolves. :cool:
 

millim6868

Alfrescian
Loyal
These clowns talk cock again ,51%, CB they tot they using roll Royce as transportation, now mrt n buses pack like sardines, after 21nov it wii be worse ,CB ,this transportation is the most fxxxing earn most income,where did all those years profit goes to?
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
These clowns talk cock again ,51%, CB they tot they using roll Royce as transportation, now mrt n buses pack like sardines, after 21nov it wii be worse ,CB ,this transportation is the most fxxxing earn most income,where did all those years profit goes to?

Public Transport Council. :biggrin:
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
how many PTC council members actually take public transport, can they please tell? at Lui wayang wayang the other time take bus. this fat ah neh transport minister has done what?
 

LordElrond

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
57363176-4E13-4E22-9936-1A304F99392D.jpeg

It’s all about choices. Commuters can always buy a car to avoid public transport costs increase.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
What’s wrong with walking? Just like sex don’t need big space, u can travel to most places by walking! Lol… knn those bastards
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
This shows that the PAP has actively subsidized public transport for sinkies. Sinkies should not always expect free stuff. Someone has to pay for the 'free' stuff.
 
Top