Fail logic of pappies.

[R4g3]

Someone lost his wallet in a company, everyone is a suspect, so a search is conducted.

When comes to this manager of the company, he say no need to search him, because "I did not do it, so no need to search me."

Shouldn't it be the other way, "I did not do it, so no harm searching me. And as a manager and a leader, i will step up to be the 1st one to be search." ?

Since he is clean, i dont see any reason why he should reject a search base on the reason that he is clean.


This is just like some pappies who spoke on the TV, saying that Sinkapore is stable, so there is no need to provide 100% Bank Guarantee.

Since they claim that we are stable, why afraid to give us guarantee?

i really wonder how can people talk on the TV with no logic, yet drawing millions from the people.

 

[Leongsam]

Since they claim that we are stable, why afraid to give us guarantee?

They aren't "afraid". There is simply no need for a guarantee.

If I bought a Renault or an Audi, I would insist on an extended warranty as part of the purchase deal.

However, if I bought a Toyota, I would be quite happy with a standard 3 year 100,000 km warranty as things hardly ever go wrong with a Toyota.

 

[DIVISION1]

Stating guarantees in a crisis sends the wrong psychological message and reduces one more weapon that can be utilized when strong concerns set in. By refusing to do so, sends a strong signal of a position of strength to the international markets.

 

[makapaaa]

Stating guarantees in a crisis sends the wrong psychological message and reduces one more weapon that can be utilized when strong concerns set in. By refusing to do so, sends a strong signal of a position of strength to the international markets.

Sure, the whole world is wrong and your owner is always correct. No wonder your owners are the ones to bring the first cuntry into recession despite being the BEST paid in the world.

 

[Kid278]

Stating guarantees in a crisis sends the wrong psychological message and reduces one more weapon that can be utilized when strong concerns set in. By refusing to do so, sends a strong signal of a position of strength to the international markets.

Message and signal, that's foolish utterance. The message they are sending is No guarantee, No liability. Plain and clear.:(

 

[JinGanKor]

Someone lost his wallet in a company, everyone is a suspect, so a search is conducted.

When comes to this manager of the company, he say no need to search him, because "I did not do it, so no need to search me."

Shouldn't it be the other way, "I did not do it, so no harm searching me. And as a manager and a leader, i will step up to be the 1st one to be search." ?

Since he is clean, i dont see any reason why he should reject a search base on the reason that he is clean.


This is just like some pappies who spoke on the TV, saying that Sinkapore is stable, so there is no need to provide 100% Bank Guarantee.

Since they claim that we are stable, why afraid to give us guarantee?

i really wonder how can people talk on the TV with no logic, yet drawing millions from the people.

Your example really makes them look like retards.

Nowadays they dont even need to think of something logical, just give the people any crap reasons and make them swallow it.

 

[pweesng]

it is not that simple. A guarantee cost money to the depositors.

FDIC (in US) and SDIC (in Singapore) does not guarantee your funds for nothing. Part of your interest is being used as the premium for the "insurance"

IMHO, if the bank is safe, there is no need for depositor to spend that kind of extra money. Especially when interest rates are so low now... and in difficult times, every penny counts.

 

[Einfield]

They aren't "afraid". There is simply no need for a guarantee.

If I bought a Renault or an Audi, I would insist on an extended warranty as part of the purchase deal.

However, if I bought a Toyota, I would be quite happy with a standard 3 year 100,000 km warranty as things hardly ever go wrong with a Toyota.

Since you use the word Hardly, that means you have confidence, since the issue of the day is confidence, then what's the big deal in giving guarantee to help boost global confidence?

 

[po2wq]

cannot guarantee la ... reserve oso dun noe gt how much ... skali, money no enuf 2 cover, how? ... :p

 

[chupacabra]

Stating guarantees in a crisis sends the wrong psychological message and reduces one more weapon that can be utilized when strong concerns set in. By refusing to do so, sends a strong signal of a position of strength to the international markets.

Aiya, Pappies already bankrupt la. No need for all the psychology shit.
The simpler explanation is usually the right one.

 

[VIBGYOR]

Someone lost his wallet in a company, everyone is a suspect, so a search is conducted.

Only in Asia we have this, never heard of such things in angmo co overseas