Explosive Growth of SPGs Breaking Cherry in Under 16!

[makapaaa]

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Feb 9, 2009
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Rise in teen sex <!--10 min-->
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Carolyn Quek and Kimberly Spykerman
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"-->NEVER mind that they know little about the birds and the bees, teenage girls here are still going ahead with the deed - and in larger numbers as well.
The latest police figures show that 310 girls below the age of 16 were caught engaging in underage consensual sex last year - nearly 45per cent more than the year before.
Put against the number from five years ago - 163 - the jump is even starker.
Most of the time, their parents or teachers report them to the police; police officers on patrol have also caught them in the act.
The police say that most of the time, these girls are with men known to them, usually their boyfriends or friends. Read the full story in The Straits Times today.

 

[makapaaa]

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Pregnant when she was barely 15
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->BARELY 15, 'Nora' found herself grappling with an issue that was no child's play - an unwanted baby on the way.
The pregnancy was the result of a one-night dalliance with a man she barely knew.
<TABLE width=200 align=left valign="top"><TBODY><TR><TD class=padr8><!-- Vodcast --><!-- Background Story --><STYLE type=text/css> #related .quote {background-color:#E7F7FF; padding:8px;margin:0px 0px 5px 0px;} #related .quote .headline {font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:10px;font-weight:bold; border-bottom:3px double #007BFF; color:#036; text-transform:uppercase; padding-bottom:5px;} #related .quote .text {font-size:11px;color:#036;padding:5px 0px;} </STYLE>In the past, drugs and cigarettes were the stuff of youthful experimentation, but today, it is sex... And while girls are typically cast as 'victims' under the law, not all of them are as innocent as they seem.



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>It was not her first time.
The school dropout had been hanging out with a seedy, mostly older, crowd from her neighbourhood. Her friends were into drinking, drugs and sex, and she envied the freedom they had. Resentful of the way her parents monitored her, she ran away from home seven times.
As she needed money for her days on the streets, she turned to prostitution, charging between $60 and $80 a tryst.
'I knew a little bit about sex but learnt more from the prostitutes in Geylang,' she said.
She said she was 'scared' during her first encounter with a foreign worker, but 'just thought about the money'.
She became blase, and did not always insist her clients use protection; it was 'inconvenient' to force them to use condoms.
Nora claims that in one year, she had sex with 'more than five, but fewer than 10' men. The eighth time she ran away from home was to be the last. It was during the five months she stayed away from home that she found herself pregnant.
By then, her parents had filed a Beyond Parental Control order. Her pregnancy came to light in a check-up she was put through when she was sent to a girls' home.
She had an abortion.
Now turning 16, the soft-spoken girl who appears older than her age, is working on getting along better with her parents and hopes to become a model for bridal wear. She is seeing someone in his 20s, but says she has not had sex with him.
'Don't do it because of a guy or money. Maybe it's better to wait until you're married. Think of your future,' she said.
CAROLYN QUEK & KIMBERLY SPYKERMAN
<!-- end of for each --><!-- Current Ratings : start --><SCRIPT language=javascript> addRatingPortion() </SCRIPT>

 

[makapaaa]

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Sexually active teens getting infections
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->SEXUALLY transmitted infections (STIs) among teenagers have become a reality, with more of them engaging in sex.
In the five years between 2004 and last year, 518 girls aged between 12 and 16 were diagnosed with STIs at the clinic in Kelantan Lane run by the Department of STI Control.
Among boys, the figure was 119, over the same period of time.
Dr Tan Hiok Hee, who heads the clinic, said the youngest female patient was 14, and the youngest male, 15.
Chlamydia is the most common infection in young girls, he said of the bacterial infection that often does not produce symptoms but can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease and raise the risk of ectopic pregnancy and future infertility.
But even if sexually active teenagers do not pick up diseases, they may have to deal with unwanted pregnancies and abortions.
The number of babies born to mothers aged below 15 has been fairly stable, at about 15 a year in the last five years.
Going by provisional figures for last year, 10 babies were born to mothers under 15 and 798 to mothers aged 15 to 19.
The number of teenagers seeking abortions was about 1,400 in 2006, with a similar number for 2007.
Interest groups have targeted programmes at youth, advocating abstinence or safe sex.
For example, Focus on the Family runs two main sexuality-education programmes, including one which gives parents and educators the teaching tools to broach the topic.
The Association of Women for Action and Research also runs sexuality-education sessions to educate girls on sex and its implications, in the hope that they will make safe decisions when it comes to sex.
Sanctuary House, besides caring for unwanted babies, plans to convey the stark responsibilities of parenthood to pairs of youth - by making them play parents to a computerised infant who constantly needs to be fed, burped, changed and cared for - on pain of being labelled as 'abusive' parents.
Mr Tan said of this program offering a virtual peek into parenthood: 'We want to tell the teens that this is what happens when you get pregnant and give birth.
'This is pre-emptive because they get to experience what it's like taking care of a baby the whole night with the sleep deprivation...
'The question is: Do you want to go there?'
CAROLYN QUEK & KIMBERLY SPYKERMAN

 

[kiwibird7]

I wonder why LKY would now say about S'pore's "ASIAN VALUES"?

 

[eErotica69]

I wonder why LKY would now say about S'pore's "ASIAN VALUES"?

Sure, just blame LKY for any f**k thing!!

 

[kiwibird7]

Sure, just blame LKY for any f**k thing!!

The BUCK of course has to stop at the HIGHEST paid MENTOR in the world.

Didn't the MENTOR MINISTER claim that the forced inculcation of the MOTHER TONGUE would act as a 'protection' against WESTERN immorality & decadence by the preservation and strengthening of 'ASIAN VALUES'.

LKY has always said: Asian culture=GOOD, Western Culture= BAD!

Silly me, I forgot that when things go wrong, no blame can be attached to any of the TEFLON COATED (NON-STICK) PAP Ministers especially the MENTOR. But credit is always claimed whenever things go right.

 

[Lestat]

You guys are making a mountain out of a molehill.

How can it be possibly that you blame LKY for EVERYTHING which has got to do with personal choice?

Be objective, not subjective.

 

[kiwibird7]

You guys are making a mountain out of a molehill.

How can it be possibly that you blame LKY for EVERYTHING which has got to do with personal choice?

Be objective, not subjective.

Personal choice DOES not operate in a vacuum. It is often moulded by govt policies known as social engineering that is brought to bear on the population. The govt sets the environmental parameters that limit and shape the limits of personal choice.

From making mothers go to work and leave behind latchkey children cared for by maids because a dual family income is needed to pay the exorbitant 'affordable' HDB flats results in an emotional void and lack of parental-child bonding.

The results of the emotional void and stressed out life can be seen in anti-social behaviour; maid rage, teens looking for love and attention outside the home -teen sex, teen pregnancies, teen Multiple abortions, multiple sex partners (1 night stands) and STDs etc.

 

[Lestat]

You are making it such that a choice you make in life is pre-determined by the boundaries which the government you are under defines. This is not right.

The whole point of personal choice is you decide what you want to do. Of course, if there's going to be any punishments or rewards, you have to accept them accordingly too.

Personal choice is NOT: because the government says this and that, therefore what I choose to do MUST be within the boundaries.

 

[angry_one]

The family is the basic building block of any society. If social policies are crappy, they damage the family and the entire block will collapse. For eg: salaries are low and costs are high. So both parents work. So no one monitors the children or teach them the right values. And you get cases like this.

 

[tonychat]

Personal choice DOES not operate in a vacuum. It is often moulded by govt policies known as social engineering that is brought to bear on the population. The govt sets the environmental parameters that limit and shape the limits of personal choice.

From making mothers go to work and leave behind latchkey children cared for by maids because a dual family income is needed to pay the exorbitant 'affordable' HDB flats results in an emotional void and lack of parental-child bonding.

The results of the emotional void and stressed out life can be seen in anti-social behaviour; maid rage, teens looking for love and attention outside the home -teen sex, teen pregnancies, teen Multiple abortions, multiple sex partners (1 night stands) and STDs etc.

That is why when a person talks about personal choice. he does not seems to be living the real life.

Personal choice is not something that is freely available in sinkieland, more like squeeze ball choice or lan lan choice. If not , why life is so unhappy for many.

They follow rule and obey regulation but the govt back stab them into creating regulation and rules that cause them inconveniences and suffering and still expect sinkies to follow them and didn't improve the economy much at all. in face it contracted and still tell the world the economy is good.

To me, screw them!!!! Just revolt and throw them out.

 

[Kenshinng]

i agree with angry_one on this. especially now when the economy is like this, the employers have more hold on the employees to work longer hours, thus causing the parents to stay later at work. kids do need a good role model(s) when growing up, otherwise whatever personal choices they make might be warped versions.

 

[tonychat]

You are making it such that a choice you make in life is pre-determined by the boundaries which the government you are under defines. This is not right.

The whole point of personal choice is you decide what you want to do. Of course, if there's going to be any punishments or rewards, you have to accept them accordingly too.

Personal choice is NOT: because the government says this and that, therefore what I choose to do MUST be within the boundaries.

Personal choice has been has been taught in sinkieland is to be within the boundaries of the govt and the rules. It is being screwed into the brain of the sinkie young ones.

They are not call sinkie for nothing.

You want quality Singaporeans, change the education system.

 

[SIFU]

thai loser,

talk so much for fuck?? u r a bloody pimp, living off your prostitute ladyboy bf..:oIo:

 

[jw5]

The family is the basic building block of any society. If social policies are crappy, they damage the family and the entire block will collapse. For eg: salaries are low and costs are high. So both parents work. So no one monitors the children or teach them the right values. And you get cases like this.

It's their parents' problem, not ours.
Let them sort it out.