• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Even new citizens in Singapore felt that anti Covid-19 measures are not sufficient

cloudy

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
1,154
Points
83
As Covid-19 spreads in Singapore, Chinese immigrants fear a repeat of mainland experience
www.msn.com
  • Many who have lost family and friends to the outbreak are worried the city state is unprepared for a new wave of infections
  • Although Chinese residents of Singapore are heeding the government’s advice, ‘emotions are in a mess right now’
Singapore’s handling of the deadly coronavirus outbreak may have won plaudits from experts around the world, but Tao, a Chinese immigrantin the city state, is hoping that authorities do even more.

The 48-year-old recently lost his father to the Covid-19 illness caused by the virus, which originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan where some of his family and relatives live.

"My father died of pneumonia in Wuhan two days after the city was closed off, so I know how scary, pervasive and lethal the virus is,” he said, referring to the unprecedented lockdown of the capital of Hubei province and surrounding cities on January 23.

His father’s death has compounded Tao’s fears that a new wave of infections could hit Singapore.

"China’s methods to close off the affected cities have given Singapore some lead time to put in place measures, but there are new waves from South Korea and Europe that are about to come. They might have a greater impact on Singapore,” said the naturalised Singaporean, who asked to be identified only by his surname.

Like many Chinese immigrants living or working in the city state, Tao is anxious about the outbreak, which has crippled virus-hit communities in China and caused ripples felt thousands of miles away.

Globally, upwards of 109,000 people have been infected by the virus, which has killed more than 3,800 so far.

While most cases are in China, there have also been major outbreaks in South Korea, Italy and Iran.

Singapore has so far confirmed 160 infections, with 93 full recoveries. No deaths have been recorded, but authorities have stressed on several occasions that Singaporeans need to be mentally prepared for that scenario.

Tao’s worry that Singapore would be hit by new waves of infections – given its openness and connectedness – is shared by government officials, who have ramped up measures to tackle the outbreak, with travel bans extended to include countries where infections have mushroomed in recent weeks and checks at borders strengthened.

"The country’s containment measures are quite good and the rate of recovery is high, and I am satisfied. But the current methods might not be enough,” Tao said.

He suggested that Singapore take a leaf out of China’s book to contain the illness’ spread, giving the example of his nephew in Wuhan who is attending classes from home, keeping up with lessons using social media and mobile apps.

Tao, whose 7-year-old son is in primary school, said he was worried the outbreak would hit schools, putting his child at risk. In an attempt to boost both their immune systems, the two walk the 5km to school every day, he said.

"Big gatherings such as weddings should also be dissuaded,” he added, pointing to how it had become commonplace in China to host virtual events on online platforms, with food delivered to guests’ homes and gifts of money transferred using digital wallets.

Other than a bout of panic buying, Singapore’s populace has mostly been going about their lives as normal. Some offices have implemented measures to split employees into teams to work from home, but schools remain open and large public gatherings have not been banned, as evidenced by the 30 cases – the city state’s largest cluster – linked to a Lunar New Year dinner at Safra Jurong on February 15 that is thought to have included as many as 200 guests.

Another celebration in early February which drew tens of thousands of people was heavily criticised online, with some Chinese nationals in Singapore taking to Weibo to express their anger at how the event was not called off.
Chang, who is originally from Beijing but lives in Singapore with her daughter, said it was sometimes difficult to square the advice they get from relatives in China – such as wearing face masks – with the fact that they are in different country where the outbreak has not hit as hard.

"Everyone’s emotions are in a mess right now,” she said. "This is especially for those whose families are in the epicentre of the outbreak. They look at the virus in a totally different light.”

It would be insensitive to say that they are overreacting as their families are directly affected, added Chang, who also asked to be identified only by her surname.

Likewise, she was at a loss when Singapore authorities said a mask should only be worn when an individual was unwell.

The Singapore government has maintained that its citizens should only wear surgical masks when they display respiratory symptoms such as a cough or runny nose, and to not hoard masks as it would deprive others, including medical professionals, who need them.

"When we heard it, we were quite confused. We were wondering why the government would say such a thing,” she said. "But after hearing their explanation and how it was part of a long-term solution, we accepted the explanation.”

Similarly, Ng, a naturalised Singaporean who has lived here for 12 years, said that she has been receiving daily messages from her parents, who are from Wuhan.

Her father has repeatedly told her to drink herbal medicine to strengthen her immune system, and to put on a mask when she leaves her house.

She also found the Singapore government’s directive to not wear masks odd, but said she now accepted the reasoning behind it, and even lauded the government for keeping things in control.

National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser said that it was not surprising to hear the coronavirus concerns of Chinese nationals in Singapore.

"It is quite understandable that they are worried, given that the situation back home in China is particularly salient for them, more so than for Singaporeans, who are by and large confident of the government’s handling of the outbreak here,” he said.

While saying that "a bit of anxiety and fear is fine”, Tan stressed that such emotions could spiral into paranoia or a sense of helplessness, leaving sufferers unable to lead their normal daily lives.

Leong Chan-Hoong, an assistant professor at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, said the measures put in place by the government had been "pretty reassuring” and its containment strategy seemed to be effective.

"But moving forward, when there is a wider spread of the coronavirus in other parts of the world, the number of cases may go up again,” he said.

At such a point, Leong said that Chinese nationals in Singapore might feel "shaken” but added that he hoped they would have "learned to live with or cope with this fear better”.

"There will be some form of habituation,” he said, adding that fear alone can drive people to do "extraordinary things” such as hoarding daily necessities like toilet paper – a phenomenon seen in several countries in recent weeks.

"Over time, people will get used to it,” he said. "They will be able to understand and comprehend the challenges better, and feel more confident that we can deal with the problem in the weeks ahead.”

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the leading news media reporting on China and Asia.

Copyright (c) 2020. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
 
It is safe for the chinks in singapore to go back to china now.less new case than here
 
When Trump is eliminated he brings the virus with him to Mar la go... world peace at sight...
 
As Covid-19 spreads in Singapore, Chinese immigrants fear a repeat of mainland experience
www.msn.com
  • Many who have lost family and friends to the outbreak are worried the city state is unprepared for a new wave of infections
  • Although Chinese residents of Singapore are heeding the government’s advice, ‘emotions are in a mess right now’
Singapore’s handling of the deadly coronavirus outbreak may have won plaudits from experts around the world, but Tao, a Chinese immigrantin the city state, is hoping that authorities do even more.

The 48-year-old recently lost his father to the Covid-19 illness caused by the virus, which originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan where some of his family and relatives live.

"My father died of pneumonia in Wuhan two days after the city was closed off, so I know how scary, pervasive and lethal the virus is,” he said, referring to the unprecedented lockdown of the capital of Hubei province and surrounding cities on January 23.

His father’s death has compounded Tao’s fears that a new wave of infections could hit Singapore.

"China’s methods to close off the affected cities have given Singapore some lead time to put in place measures, but there are new waves from South Korea and Europe that are about to come. They might have a greater impact on Singapore,” said the naturalised Singaporean, who asked to be identified only by his surname.

Like many Chinese immigrants living or working in the city state, Tao is anxious about the outbreak, which has crippled virus-hit communities in China and caused ripples felt thousands of miles away.

Globally, upwards of 109,000 people have been infected by the virus, which has killed more than 3,800 so far.

While most cases are in China, there have also been major outbreaks in South Korea, Italy and Iran.

Singapore has so far confirmed 160 infections, with 93 full recoveries. No deaths have been recorded, but authorities have stressed on several occasions that Singaporeans need to be mentally prepared for that scenario.

Tao’s worry that Singapore would be hit by new waves of infections – given its openness and connectedness – is shared by government officials, who have ramped up measures to tackle the outbreak, with travel bans extended to include countries where infections have mushroomed in recent weeks and checks at borders strengthened.

"The country’s containment measures are quite good and the rate of recovery is high, and I am satisfied. But the current methods might not be enough,” Tao said.

He suggested that Singapore take a leaf out of China’s book to contain the illness’ spread, giving the example of his nephew in Wuhan who is attending classes from home, keeping up with lessons using social media and mobile apps.

Tao, whose 7-year-old son is in primary school, said he was worried the outbreak would hit schools, putting his child at risk. In an attempt to boost both their immune systems, the two walk the 5km to school every day, he said.

"Big gatherings such as weddings should also be dissuaded,” he added, pointing to how it had become commonplace in China to host virtual events on online platforms, with food delivered to guests’ homes and gifts of money transferred using digital wallets.

Other than a bout of panic buying, Singapore’s populace has mostly been going about their lives as normal. Some offices have implemented measures to split employees into teams to work from home, but schools remain open and large public gatherings have not been banned, as evidenced by the 30 cases – the city state’s largest cluster – linked to a Lunar New Year dinner at Safra Jurong on February 15 that is thought to have included as many as 200 guests.

Another celebration in early February which drew tens of thousands of people was heavily criticised online, with some Chinese nationals in Singapore taking to Weibo to express their anger at how the event was not called off.
Chang, who is originally from Beijing but lives in Singapore with her daughter, said it was sometimes difficult to square the advice they get from relatives in China – such as wearing face masks – with the fact that they are in different country where the outbreak has not hit as hard.

"Everyone’s emotions are in a mess right now,” she said. "This is especially for those whose families are in the epicentre of the outbreak. They look at the virus in a totally different light.”

It would be insensitive to say that they are overreacting as their families are directly affected, added Chang, who also asked to be identified only by her surname.

Likewise, she was at a loss when Singapore authorities said a mask should only be worn when an individual was unwell.

The Singapore government has maintained that its citizens should only wear surgical masks when they display respiratory symptoms such as a cough or runny nose, and to not hoard masks as it would deprive others, including medical professionals, who need them.

"When we heard it, we were quite confused. We were wondering why the government would say such a thing,” she said. "But after hearing their explanation and how it was part of a long-term solution, we accepted the explanation.”

Similarly, Ng, a naturalised Singaporean who has lived here for 12 years, said that she has been receiving daily messages from her parents, who are from Wuhan.

Her father has repeatedly told her to drink herbal medicine to strengthen her immune system, and to put on a mask when she leaves her house.

She also found the Singapore government’s directive to not wear masks odd, but said she now accepted the reasoning behind it, and even lauded the government for keeping things in control.

National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser said that it was not surprising to hear the coronavirus concerns of Chinese nationals in Singapore.

"It is quite understandable that they are worried, given that the situation back home in China is particularly salient for them, more so than for Singaporeans, who are by and large confident of the government’s handling of the outbreak here,” he said.

While saying that "a bit of anxiety and fear is fine”, Tan stressed that such emotions could spiral into paranoia or a sense of helplessness, leaving sufferers unable to lead their normal daily lives.

Leong Chan-Hoong, an assistant professor at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, said the measures put in place by the government had been "pretty reassuring” and its containment strategy seemed to be effective.

"But moving forward, when there is a wider spread of the coronavirus in other parts of the world, the number of cases may go up again,” he said.

At such a point, Leong said that Chinese nationals in Singapore might feel "shaken” but added that he hoped they would have "learned to live with or cope with this fear better”.

"There will be some form of habituation,” he said, adding that fear alone can drive people to do "extraordinary things” such as hoarding daily necessities like toilet paper – a phenomenon seen in several countries in recent weeks.

"Over time, people will get used to it,” he said. "They will be able to understand and comprehend the challenges better, and feel more confident that we can deal with the problem in the weeks ahead.”

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the leading news media reporting on China and Asia.

Copyright (c) 2020. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Look at facts news report praise

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...s-singapores-containment-of-covid-19-outbreak
 
Singapore govt wants measures to be not that extreme, because they don't want businesses to suffer.

Gig economy people (read: unemployed grab drivers and pizza delivery men) will of course suffer
 
Globally, upwards of 109,000 people have been infected by the virus, which has killed more than 3,800 so far.
This is a very small number considering the fact that there are 7 billion of us on this planet.

In 2018 more than 3000 people were killed by flu just in Australia alone.
 
It is safe for the chinks in singapore to go back to china now.less new case than here

If these imported naturalised FS are not happy in SG, they should just pack and FO to where they came from. Locals would be happy to lit fire crackers to send them off.
 
Singapore govt wants measures to be not that extreme, because they don't want businesses to suffer.

Gig economy people (read: unemployed grab drivers and pizza delivery men) will of course suffer
Money is more important than lives of human beings.
 
This is a very small number considering the fact that there are 7 billion of us on this planet.

In 2018 more than 3000 people were killed by flu just in Australia alone.
Any live lost is one too many.
 
Any live lost is one too many.

Lives are not "lost" they simply come to an end.

If every single thing that caused deaths resulted in a lockdown nobody would be able to walk or drive on the streets because 120 people a year lose their lives on the roads of Singapore. Then there is dengue fever which takes many lives annually and unlike the corona virus dengue is absolutely controllable.
 
Lives are not "lost" they simply come to an end.

If every single thing that caused deaths resulted in a lockdown nobody would be able to walk or drive on the streets because 120 people a year lose their lives on the roads of Singapore. Then there is dengue fever which takes many lives annually and unlike the corona virus dengue is absolutely controllable.
Why are you always so extreme in your views? Have a heart. The life that is lost could be someone's father, mother, son, daughter, brother or sister.
 
Why are you always so extreme in your views? Have a heart. The life that is lost could be someone's father, mother, son, daughter, brother or sister.

I have plenty of heart and I feel for anyone who has lost a loved one.

However that has to be balanced with the fact that life is inherently risky and there are diseases that are far more dangerous than the coronavirus which I try to get people to take seriously.

However when I try to help I am often rebuffed. For example I had a friend who had type 2 diabetes. I tried my best to get him to exercise and to cut his sugar and carb intake because diabetes is far more dangerous than the coronavirus. However he said I was being paranoid and that he'd be fine because he was taking medication.

He died six months ago from kidney failure.

There are so many things that are within our control that we can do to preserve life but so many don't bother taking action till it is too late. The corona virus we currently have no control over so just don't worry about it. There is no point worrying about things that we have no control over. What's more the probability of dying from the coronavirus is very low so there is no point getting so worked up.
 
I have plenty of heart and I feel for anyone who has lost a loved one.

However that has to be balanced with the fact that life is inherently risky and there are diseases that are far more dangerous than the coronavirus which I try to get people to take seriously.

However when I try to help I am often rebuffed. For example I had a friend who had type 2 diabetes. I tried my best to get him to exercise and to cut his sugar and carb intake because diabetes is far more dangerous than the coronavirus. However he said I was being paranoid and that he'd be fine because he was taking medication.

He died six months ago from kidney failure.

There are so many things that are within our control that we can do to preserve life but so many don't bother taking action till it is too late. The corona virus we currently have no control over so just don't worry about it. There is no point worrying about things that we have no control over. What's more the probability of dying from the coronavirus is very low so there is no point getting so worked up.
Sorry to hear about your stubborn friend.

But he deserved what he sowed. But many Covid-19 victims don't deserve such "punishment", especially the healthy ones.
 
Sorry to hear about your stubborn friend.

But he deserved what he sowed. But many Covid-19 victims don't deserve such "punishment", especially the healthy ones.

Infections are not punishment they are part and parcel of nature.
 
Everyone must know the truth and the truth shall set you free. All those kiasi, kiasu panic buying and hoarding of masks are the same foreigners who are fearful of everything. Local born Singaporeans culture are very different from naturalised Sinkies. Naturalised Sinkies are the worse of cross-breed creatures who cannot think the way local born Singaporeans think. If you put those Naturalised Sinkies in a building to be quarantined, they will run away or jump down from the building. That is the difference betwen us and them.
 
Infections are not punishment they are part and parcel of nature.
Infection can be prevented with proper hygiene, laws and regulations. The wait and see approach of the Singapore government is wrong. They are reactionary and not pro active.
 
Infection can be prevented with proper hygiene, laws and regulations. The wait and see approach of the Singapore government is wrong. They are reactionary and not pro active.

The Singapore government response to the corona virus has set the standard for the rest of the world! You lose all credibility when you try to politicise what is a medical event.

https://mothership.sg/2020/02/singapore-coronavirus-detection-harvard/

A study by Harvard University researchers has showered praise on Singapore for its Covid-19 virus detection tenacity.


According to the latest research, almost three times more cases of the Covid-19 virus could have been found globally if the rest of the world possessed the same “gold standard” detection capability as Singapore.

This latest study, conducted by a team of researchers from Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, attempts to estimate the level of under-detection of the coronavirus (Covid-19) cases globally.

It claimed that the world is detecting imported cases of Covid-19 at 38 per cent of Singapore’s ability to do so.


This finding was published on MedRxiv on Feb. 14 and has not been peer-reviewed, which means it has not been evaluated to guide clinical practice.

The researchers studied 191 locations around the world, reflecting mainly countries without taking any position on territorial claims and excluding mainland China (the epicentre of Covid-19), as well as Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau.


Singapore has “near perfect” detection
Among the countries with substantial travel volume, Singapore showed the highest ratio of detected imported cases to daily travel volume.

The reporting of Covid-19 cases in Singapore is also described as “extremely detailed” in the research paper.

Singapore is also historically known for “exceptionally sensitive” detection of cases during SARS.

However, Singapore’s detection is not perfect given that there are still cases with no links identified, implying that imported cases might have gone undetected.

Like other countries, the detection in Singapore relies on the display of symptoms and travel history so there is a possibility that asymptomatic cases go unnoticed.

The researchers consider the detection of 18 cases by Feb. 4 as “a gold standard of near perfect detection” and had used Singapore’s detection standard as the baseline to estimate the probability of detection in other countries.


Global detection is 38 per cent of Singapore’s detection capacity
The study finds that the global ability to detect imported cases is 38 per cent of Singapore’s capacity.

That means about 2.8 times the current number of imported cases could have been undetected if every country detects imported cases like Singapore. This also means there are 1.8 undetected cases for every detected case in Singapore.

This piece of information is important to the estimation of the severity and case burden of Covid-19 and it is likely that the severity of the Covid-19 has been overestimated, given more cases might have been gone undiscovered.


Photo via Changi Airport Facebook page
 
Money is more important than lives of human beings.


I remember Lim Hng Kiang (if I remember correctly) saying that he regretted saving the life of an infant because the hospital bill came up over $300,000.

I guess he values a newborn infant somewhat less than $300,000, did some quick math, and felt that he had invested poorly.
 
Back
Top