Seemingly clueless leaders are clutching discredited policies and ignoring the warning signs of trouble.
Prime Minister Starmer at the Metropolitan Police Command and Control
Why do these migrants want to go to Great Britain? The answer is simple: it is easier to enter the social services in the UK than in France. And the British are even more generous, in the cornucopia of benefits they lavish on these economic migrants posing as “asylum seekers,” than are the French. The free or subsidized housing is better, the medical coverage under the National Health Service more extensive, the family allowances and unemployment benefits larger in the UK than in France. If these migrants were genuine “asylum seekers,” they shouldn’t care which European country granted them asylum, but they are not asylum seekers; they are economic migrants, and will head for those countries in Europe where the benefits are biggest. These are the UK, Germany, and Sweden.
The Sun goes on to say that in France, President Emmanuel Macron did not “internalize” – that is, take to heart — the reasons for the National Rally’s success. This is the party of Marine Le Pen, and voters turned to it because it is the only party that directly addresses the Muslim immigration crisis, and promises to not only call a halt to that immigration, but to repatriate Muslims, beginning with those who have been convicted of crimes. Macron continues to avoid discussing the “Muslim migrant” problem, for he does not dare to echo the National Rally and Marine Le Pen. That would allow his opponents on the left, such as the antisemitic Jean-Luc Mélenchon, to paint him as a “racist” and “Islamophobe.” Instead, Macron is attempting to direct public attention away from Muslim migration and onto other matters.
Waves of Muslims continue to pour into Western Europe each year, claiming to be “asylum seekers,” but in reality they are economic migrants, costing European taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in welfare benefits each year. In 2023, $36 billion was spent on these migrants in Germany alone. The Muslims in Europe are responsible for a vast increase in both crimes of property and crimes of violence, such as street assaults, rapes, and murders. There is a general sense of insecurity and malaise, and governments are apparently incapable of cracking down on this migration, much less stopping it altogether, and unable to enforce their own deportation orders. A few more high-profile stabbings by Muslim migrants will lead to new expressions of popular rage, akin to that on display in the UK this summer. Europeans are turning rightward because of only one thing: their anger against their governments’ inability to handle the Muslim immigrant crisis.
Prime Minister Starmer at the Metropolitan Police Command and Control
Why do these migrants want to go to Great Britain? The answer is simple: it is easier to enter the social services in the UK than in France. And the British are even more generous, in the cornucopia of benefits they lavish on these economic migrants posing as “asylum seekers,” than are the French. The free or subsidized housing is better, the medical coverage under the National Health Service more extensive, the family allowances and unemployment benefits larger in the UK than in France. If these migrants were genuine “asylum seekers,” they shouldn’t care which European country granted them asylum, but they are not asylum seekers; they are economic migrants, and will head for those countries in Europe where the benefits are biggest. These are the UK, Germany, and Sweden.
The Sun goes on to say that in France, President Emmanuel Macron did not “internalize” – that is, take to heart — the reasons for the National Rally’s success. This is the party of Marine Le Pen, and voters turned to it because it is the only party that directly addresses the Muslim immigration crisis, and promises to not only call a halt to that immigration, but to repatriate Muslims, beginning with those who have been convicted of crimes. Macron continues to avoid discussing the “Muslim migrant” problem, for he does not dare to echo the National Rally and Marine Le Pen. That would allow his opponents on the left, such as the antisemitic Jean-Luc Mélenchon, to paint him as a “racist” and “Islamophobe.” Instead, Macron is attempting to direct public attention away from Muslim migration and onto other matters.
Waves of Muslims continue to pour into Western Europe each year, claiming to be “asylum seekers,” but in reality they are economic migrants, costing European taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in welfare benefits each year. In 2023, $36 billion was spent on these migrants in Germany alone. The Muslims in Europe are responsible for a vast increase in both crimes of property and crimes of violence, such as street assaults, rapes, and murders. There is a general sense of insecurity and malaise, and governments are apparently incapable of cracking down on this migration, much less stopping it altogether, and unable to enforce their own deportation orders. A few more high-profile stabbings by Muslim migrants will lead to new expressions of popular rage, akin to that on display in the UK this summer. Europeans are turning rightward because of only one thing: their anger against their governments’ inability to handle the Muslim immigrant crisis.
