• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Engineer in fatal crane collapse 'not liable for damages'

Krizalid

Alfrescian
Loyal

Engineer in fatal crane collapse 'not liable for damages'


Published on Mar 5, 2012

ST_IMAGES_VICRANE05_e.jpg


The crane collapsed at the NUS worksite in 2008, killing three workers. -- ST PHOTO: JOYCE FANG

By K. C. Vijayan, Law Correspondent

The Court of Appeal has cleared an engineer from having to pay damages over a tower crane collapse that killed three workers.

The apex court's decision reversed a High Court ruling last year which found Mr Tan Juay Pah liable to crane supplier Rango Machinery Services, which in turn had to compensate main contractor Kimly Construction for the mishap.

The court, in 66-page judgment grounds released last Friday, ruled that Kimly and Rango cannot shift the blame for the accident to Mr Tan, who had been hired to certify the crane fit for use.

Allowing Kimly and Rango to do this would be tantamount to using Mr Tan as 'insurance cover for the mishap', said the appeals court.

Read the full story in Monday's edition of The Straits Times.
 
Top