<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>PMETs must learn to keep upgrading themselves
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Monday's article, 'Better-educated jobless will get help'.
Many Singaporeans do not realise [COLOR=_______]how fortunate we are when the Prime Minister announced another strategy to counter the most severe post-war recession by extending help to retrenched professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) via various training and development schemes with generous incentives.[/COLOR] To my knowledge, none of our neighbouring countries can do the same.
=> Which country betrays its citizens like what his beluved Ass Loon does?
But this move risks creating a 'moral hazard' in behaviour among better-educated citizens. Some PMETs may have thought good times would continue indefinitely and so that crucial decision to upgrade oneself in good times could be put on the back burner.
Accessibility is not a legitimate excuse as our many world-class institutions of learning provide a comprehensive range of Continuing Education and Training programmes designed to meet the manpower needs of the economy.
Not all individuals are equally capable of making sound decisions in their own interest but we would normally attribute this to the less educated among the workforce. Thus there is always a primary role for government intervention with this pool of workers to enable them to remain relevant to the changing economic and technological landscape.
The same cannot be said for the better-educated PMETs who had previously enjoyed heavily subsidised tertiary education in the polytechnics and universities before they entered the workforce.
They were rigorously educated and trained, made aware that continuous learning is a must in this fast-changing world, and on top of that equipped with the necessary core skills to do so.
This unprecedented recession justifies the help initiatives for PMETs. However, when things go back to normal, we need to have a correct perspective on the balance between state and individual responsibility for self-development.
PMETs must take greater responsibility and adopt an active learning approach to life and calculate and implement the learning needed to enhance one's self-reliance. Dr Edmund Lam
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to Monday's article, 'Better-educated jobless will get help'.
Many Singaporeans do not realise [COLOR=_______]how fortunate we are when the Prime Minister announced another strategy to counter the most severe post-war recession by extending help to retrenched professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) via various training and development schemes with generous incentives.[/COLOR] To my knowledge, none of our neighbouring countries can do the same.
=> Which country betrays its citizens like what his beluved Ass Loon does?
But this move risks creating a 'moral hazard' in behaviour among better-educated citizens. Some PMETs may have thought good times would continue indefinitely and so that crucial decision to upgrade oneself in good times could be put on the back burner.
Accessibility is not a legitimate excuse as our many world-class institutions of learning provide a comprehensive range of Continuing Education and Training programmes designed to meet the manpower needs of the economy.
Not all individuals are equally capable of making sound decisions in their own interest but we would normally attribute this to the less educated among the workforce. Thus there is always a primary role for government intervention with this pool of workers to enable them to remain relevant to the changing economic and technological landscape.
The same cannot be said for the better-educated PMETs who had previously enjoyed heavily subsidised tertiary education in the polytechnics and universities before they entered the workforce.
They were rigorously educated and trained, made aware that continuous learning is a must in this fast-changing world, and on top of that equipped with the necessary core skills to do so.
This unprecedented recession justifies the help initiatives for PMETs. However, when things go back to normal, we need to have a correct perspective on the balance between state and individual responsibility for self-development.
PMETs must take greater responsibility and adopt an active learning approach to life and calculate and implement the learning needed to enhance one's self-reliance. Dr Edmund Lam