• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Dotard's Black Hawk Down Putin's Mi-17 Up! Specs beats flat! Price @half!

WW3Concert

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.rt.com/news/429992-afghanistan-us-helicopter-problems/

Pentagon finds Afghanistan’s ‘new’ Black Hawk helicopters inferior to Russian Mi-17s
Published time: 16 Jun, 2018 21:45
Get short URL
5b251851fc7e93992f8b4589.jpg

FILE PHOTO: An Mi-17 and a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters in Iraq © US Army / Sgt. Travis Zielinski / Reuters
US plans to replace Afghan Mi-17s with Black Hawks have met new “challenges,” as the Russian military choppers are superior, according to a Pentagon report. On the bright side, “private contractors” will be busy maintaining them.
The revelation has been made by the Lead Inspector General in a quarterly report on Operation Freedom's Sentinel – the current code name for the16-year-plus deployment of US troops in Afghanistan.

The decision to supply Kabul with some 160 refurbished UH-60A Black Hawk helicopters was expected to significantly boost the capabilities of the Afghan Air Force and would contribute to breaking or fully break thestalemate in the country.

Read more
Afghans question US worth in Taliban fight as Pentagon watchdog admits ‘lack of progress’
The Black Hawks are set to replace the Afghan fleet of Russian Mi-17 transport-assault helicopters.

The Pentagon, however, has warned about a lack of “necessary technical skills” among Afghani trainee pilots, as well as other obstacles, such as lack of proper “English language training.”

The new report, by the top military watchdog, has uncovered even more flaws in the plan to supply Afghanistan with UH-60As.

“The transition presents several challenges that have yet to be fully addressed. Black Hawks do not have the lift capacity of Mi-17s. They are unable to accommodate some of the larger cargo items the Mi-17s can carry, and in general, it takes almost two Black Hawks to carry the load of a single Mi-17,” the report reads.

Moreover, the Black Hawks “cannot fly at high elevations and, as such, cannot operate in remote regions of Afghanistan where Mi-17s operate.” Russian-made helicopters will therefore continue to “play a ‘crucial role’ in the near term fighting season.” “In the future, as Mi-17s phase out of service, the aforementioned challenges will become more pronounced,” the report warned.

Read more
Kabul can't support army without US money more than 6 months – Afghan president
It remains unclear how exactly these “challenges” emerged unexpectedly, since both the Mi-17 and UH-60A helicopters date back to the 1970s and their capabilities should have been well known to the US military. Indeed, military analysts had repeatedly warned against the UH-60A program, citing all the aforementioned concerns.

Such “surprise” concerns might actually originate from political –and commercial– motivations, the report hints.

“According to DoD, that transition was driven largely by the requirement for additional rotary wing lift and aerial fires capability, particularly given attrition of the Mi-17 fleet, and Congressional direction to transition to US-made rotary wing aircraft rather than spending any more from the [Afghan Security Forces Fund] on buying helicopters from Russia,” the document states.

Apart from making use of the refurbished UH-60As, the transition would also keep the “private contractors” busy “in the near to mid-term,” as the local forces lack the required experience to maintain the US-made helicopters. The Mi-17, by comparison, gets roughly 80 percent of its maintenance from Afghan specialists, while relying on “contractor logistics support” for the remaining 20 percent.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_UH-60_Black_Hawk

Specifications (UH-60L)

Data from Encyclopedia of Modern Warplanes,[160] International Directory,[161] Black Hawk[162]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 2 pilots (flight crew) with 2 crew chiefs/gunners
  • Capacity: 2,640 lb (1,200 kg) of cargo internally, including 11 troops or 6 stretchers, or 9,000 lb (4,100 kg) (UH-60L) of cargo externally
  • Length: 64 ft 10 in (19.76 m)
  • Fuselage length: 50 ft 1 in (15.27 m)
  • Fuselage width: 7 ft 9 in (2.36 m))
  • Rotor diameter: 53 ft 8 in (16.36 m)
  • Height: 16 ft 10 in (5.13 m)
  • Disc area: 2,260 ft² (210 m²)
  • Empty weight: 10,624 lb (4,819 kg)
  • Max. takeoff weight: 23,500 lb (10,660 kg)
  • Rotational speed: Engine 20,900 RPM, main rotor 258 RPM (gear ratio 81:1)[163]
  • Powerplant: 2 × General Electric T700-GE-701C turboshaft, 1,890 hp (1,410 kW) each
Performance



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mil_Mi-17




Macedonian Air Force Mi-17 performing a very tight low-level right turn

Specifications (Mil-17-1A2)
Data from [128]

General characteristics

  • Crew: Three: two pilots and one engineer
  • Capacity: 24 troops or 12 stretchers or 4,000 kg (8,820 lb) cargo internally /5,000 kg (11,023 lb) externally slung.
  • Length: 18.465 m (60 ft 7 in)
  • Rotor diameter: 21.25 m (69 ft 10½ in)
  • Height: 4.76 m (15 ft 7¼ in)
  • Disc area: 356 m² (3,834 ft²)
  • Empty weight: 7,489 kg (16,510 lb)
  • Loaded weight: 11,100 kg (24,470 lb)
  • Max. takeoff weight: 13,000 kg (28,660 lb)
  • Powerplant: 2 × Klimov VK-2500PS-03 turboshaft, 2,400 hp () each
Performance

Armament

  • up to 1,500 kg (3,300 lb) of disposable stores on six hardpoints, including bombs, rockets, and gunpods.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
If Trump had been in charge at the time everything would have been fine.
 

WW3Concert

Alfrescian
Loyal
Comparison point to point:

Putin's Dotard's
Price $ 16.4M 21.3M
Rotor blades 5 4
Crew Total 3 4
Troop Carried 24 11
Stretchers Max 12 6
Cabin Cargo 4,000kg 1,200kg
Sling Cargo 5,000kg 4,100kg
Empty Weight 7,489kg 4,819kg
Max Take Off 13,000kg 10,660kg
Body Height 4.76m 5.13m less is better to fit tight warship hanger room
Length storage 18.4m 19.76m less is better to fit tight warship hanger room
Max Speed 280km/hr 294km/hr Dotard 5% faster
Cruise Speed 260km/hr 280km/hr Dotard 7.6% faster
Ceiling Flight 6,000m 5,790m
Climb Rate 8m/s 4.5m/s
Engine Power 2x2,40hp 2x1890hp
Combat Radius 800km 592km


Internal cabin width is unconfirmed but Putin's fuselage looks wider, hence can carry bigger cargo. No figure on wiki page.

Dotard's black hawk is down, except only on speed win by few percent, all the rest of specs, flat lost!
 

WW3Concert

Alfrescian
Loyal
If Trump had been in charge at the time everything would have been fine.


Under the lame hands of Dotard, he never developed anything useful. And fucked more things up, or can not fix anything previously fucked up.

He spent more, but lost more, got less results. Crashed more war planes and war ships faster than any presidents, Even Pacific Fleet Commander & Ship commanders all got fired for crashes.

He stole fames from other presidents, like New Carriers & Submarines (with long list of failures) Like F-35B, all not developed under Dotard's hands, but Obama's hands, and Dotard Stole fame to go and do high profile launchings. Then after launchings, emerged super long list of problems, which Dotard can not solve.
 

WW3Concert

Alfrescian
Loyal
US admitted to the facts! Black Hawks are inferior to Putin's Mi-17. MAGA!

http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/k/slide_8_22664_64826.html#p=1

吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • X6Eh-fzrwiaz7374066.jpg
1 / 13
来自美国高级军事监察机构的报告终于承认,美国向阿富汗空军提供的UH-60A +黑鹰与俄罗斯制造的Mi-17 Hip直升机相比,能力和维修能力都较差。这个审查结果引起了军方的担忧,即这可能会限制阿富汗在全国范围内开展行动的能力,除非采取措施来减轻这种能力丧失。(烽火军事)



吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • _nQY-hefphqk1794509.jpg

2 / 13
据The Drive网站6月15日报道:五角大楼监察长办公室坦率承认“对于阿富汗军队来说从Mi-17s到UH-60s的转变还有几个尚未完全解决的挑战,黑鹰机队运输能力明显不如Mi-17。无法容纳Mi17可以携带的一些较大的货物,总的来说,差不多两架黑鹰才能顶上一架Mi-17。”报告中还提到“此外与Mi17不同提供给阿富汗的黑鹰也不能在高海拔地区飞行,因此不能在Mi17运行的阿富汗偏远地区中使用。”


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • ipQp-hefphqk1794548.jpg

3 / 13
这些对五角大楼本身来说是相当有辱人格的言论,因为向阿富汗空军提供黑鹰就是为了提升阿富汗军队的运送能力以及与北约盟军联合作战能力的。美国军方甚至最终希望向阿富汗空军和特种作战特种部队(SMW)共提供近160架UH-60,其中包括带有远射武器的武装直升机。


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • 7lJF-hefphqk1794589.jpg

4 / 13
截至2017年12月,阿富汗空军已有8架UH-60A+直升机。这些黑鹰的动力与UH-60L大致相同,只有一些小的修改,但是缺乏美国陆军专用型号的搭载的数字飞行管理系统。 但是比较尴尬的是,黑鹰机队不如Mi-17实用,但是使用起来却要更复杂,这会增加额外的维修和后勤问题。


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • LxFF-hefphqk1794659.jpg
5 / 13
而且在维护方面,Mi-17相对比较简单这要比UH-60As更有利于阿富汗普通民众的教育程度。美国空军根据五角大楼监察长的审查报告,阿富汗部队的最高指挥官的阿富汗空军部队几乎完全依靠黑鹰维护承包商来负责中短期的维护。


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • OW4Y-fzrwiaz7374081.jpg
6 / 13
而且Mi-17现在仍然是阿富汗空军的主力,美军在维持这一能力方面面临着额外的挑战,一方面要试图努力逐步淘汰米-17,一方面阿富汗军队还要培训米-17飞行员。 尽管Mi-17正在逐步淘汰,但阿富汗第九空中远征特遣部队(AETF-A)表示,依然需要新的飞行员来替换已经转飞黑鹰直升机的Mi-17飞行员。



吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • o2Z4-hefphqk1794801.jpg
7 / 13
五角大楼的报告指出。这对对培训阿富汗飞行员来说很矛盾,不得不继续为要淘汰直升机培养飞行员,而不是将所有新的受训人员直接投入黑鹰直升机上。在培训地勤人员维护俄制直升机也是如此。阿富汗空军非常需要这些人员来支持现有的行动。

吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • LnaD-hefphqk1794867.jpg
8 / 13
美国军方试图淡化这些问题。在彭博社的一份声明中,美国陆军陆军中校通力福克纳,五角大楼发言人表示,UH-60将能够执行90%,阿富汗的Mi-17S目前做的任务,但没有提供任何细节。 很难想象这如何能够完全准确地评估形势。尽管UH-60可能具有执行单个任务所需的性能,但这些直升机不会像Mi-17那样更适合阿富汗多山的地形。


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • M2VT-hefphqk1794890.jpg
9 / 13
多年来,国会议员越来越质疑美国军方为什么购买俄制直升机,而不是提供美国制造的平台,这个问题在克里米亚事件之后才变得更加重要,最终俄罗斯受到美国的严厉制裁。 现在无法直接从制造商那里购买新的直升机,这让美国军方很纠结,既要保留现有的Mi-17,又要交付新的UH-60。


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • V2Pd-hefphqk1794926.jpg
10 / 13
阿富汗空军长期以来一直要求拥有超过50架直升机的机队,但它始终无法达到这个目标。截至2017年12月,阿富汗空军库存47架Mi-17,但由于维修问题,其中24架不具备任务能力。2018年5月,阿富汗军队又坠毁一架进一步减少了米-17可用机队的数量。


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • xHfR-fzrwiaz7374091.jpg
11 / 13
为了尽快弥补这些短缺,美国军方向阿富汗空军转移了2架自己装备的Mi-17飞机,位于美国阿拉巴马州拉克堡美国陆军第223航空军团,执行所谓的“非标准旋转翼”训练计划,就是使用这些俄制直升机。与此同时,美国军方通过购买UH-60为送往阿富汗,补充其直升机部队实力


吃回扣了?美官方承认阿军方所用黑鹰直升机不如米17
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.20 14:10:29
  • a5Ot-hefphqk1795089.jpg
12 / 13
实际上,是美国陆军将直升机“卖出”给了美国军方的阿富汗联合安全转型司令部(CSTC-A),后者使用国会在五角大楼预算中拨出的资金“购买”了这些直升机,以支持阿富汗军队。2018年2月,五角大楼要求立法者允许他们使用在这次交易中“获得”的资金为陆军本身购买新的UH-60M直升机。并将几十架直升机基本上免费交给了阿富汗人。


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

1 / 13
The report from the U.S. senior military inspection agency finally admitted that UH-60A + Black Hawk provided by the U.S. Air Force to the Afghan Air Force has poorer capabilities and maintenance capabilities than the Russian-made Mi-17 Hip helicopter. The result of this review has caused military concerns that this may limit Afghanistan’s ability to conduct operations nationwide unless steps are taken to mitigate this loss of capacity. (Warfire military)



Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]


2 / 13
According to The Drive website reported on June 15th: The Pentagon Inspector General’s Office frankly admits that “the transition from Mi-17s to UH-60s for the Afghan Army still has several challenges that have not yet been fully resolved. The Black Hawk fleet’s transport capacity is obviously inferior Mi-17. Cannot accommodate some of the larger cargoes that the Mi17 can carry. In general, almost two Black Hawks can top a Mi-17." The report also mentions "Also different from Mi17 to Afghanistan." Blackhawks also cannot fly at high altitudes and therefore cannot be used in remote areas of Afghanistan where the Mi-17 operates."


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]


3 / 13
These are quite degrading remarks for the Pentagon itself, because the Black Hawk was provided to the Afghan Air Force in order to enhance the Afghan army's carrying capacity and joint combat capabilities with the NATO allies. The US military eventually even hopes to provide nearly 160 UH-60s to the Afghan Air Force and Special Operations Special Forces (SMW), including armed helicopters with long-range weapons.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]


4 / 13
As of December 2017, the Afghan Air Force already has eight UH-60A+ helicopters. These Blackhawks have the same dynamics as the UH-60L, with only minor modifications, but lack the digital flight management system carried by the US Army-specific models. However, what is more embarrassing is that the Blackhawks are not as practical as the Mi-17, but they are more complicated to use, which adds extra maintenance and logistics problems.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

5 / 13
And in terms of maintenance, the Mi-17 is relatively simple, which is more conducive to education of ordinary Afghan people than UH-60As. According to the review report of the Inspector General of the Pentagon, the U.S. Air Force, the Afghan Air Force's supreme commander of the Afghan Air Force, relied almost exclusively on the Black Hawk maintenance contractor to take charge of short-term maintenance.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

6 / 13
And Mi-17 is still the main force of the Afghan Air Force. The US military faces additional challenges in maintaining this capability. On the one hand, it must try to phase out the Mi-17. On the other hand, the Afghan army needs to train Mi-17 pilots. Although the Mi-17 is being phased out, the Afghanistan 9th Air Expedition Task Force (AETF-A) stated that it still needs a new pilot to replace the Mi-17 pilot who has already transferred to the Black Hawk helicopter.



Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

7 / 13
The Pentagon report points out. This is a contradiction for the training of Afghan pilots and it has been necessary to continue training helicopters for the elimination of helicopters, rather than directing all new trainees directly to Black Hawk helicopters. This is also true for training ground crews to maintain Russian-made helicopters. The Afghan Air Force needs these people very much to support the existing operations.

Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

8 / 13
The U.S. military is trying to downplay these issues. In a Bloomberg News statement, the United States Army Lt. Col. Faulkner, a Pentagon spokesman, said that the UH-60 will be able to perform 90% of the current mission of the Mi-17S in Afghanistan, but did not provide any details. It is hard to imagine how this can accurately assess the situation. Although the UH-60 may have the performance needed to perform a single mission, these helicopters will not be as suitable for the mountainous terrain of Afghanistan as the Mi-17.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

9 / 13
For many years, lawmakers have increasingly questioned why the U.S. military purchased Russian-made helicopters instead of providing U.S.-made platforms. This problem became more important after the Crimean incident. Eventually Russia was severely sanctioned by the United States. It is not possible to purchase new helicopters directly from the manufacturers. This makes the United States military tangled in the need to retain the existing Mi-17 and deliver the new UH-60.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

10 / 13
The Afghan Air Force has long required a fleet of more than 50 helicopters, but it has not been able to achieve this goal. As of December 2017, the Afghan Air Force stocked 47 Mi-17s, but due to maintenance problems, 24 of them did not have mission capabilities. In May 2018, the Afghan army crashed another and further reduced the number of Mi-17 available fleets.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

11 / 13
In order to make up for these shortcomings as soon as possible, the U.S. military transferred two Mi-17 aircraft to the Afghan Air Force. The U.S. Army 223th Air Force Corps in Fort Lauderdale, Alabama, USA, implemented a so-called "non-standard rotary wing" training program. It is using these Russian helicopters. At the same time, the U.S. military purchased UH-60 as an aid to Afghanistan to supplement its helicopter force.


Rebate? U.S. official acknowledges that the Black Hawk helicopters used by the Afghan military are not as good as meters 17
Support key to flip picture list view

Full Screen Watch 2018.06.20 14:10:29

[ IMG]

12 / 13
In fact, it was the US Army that “sell” helicopters to the U.S. military’s Joint Security Transition Command in Afghanistan (CSTC-A), which used Congress’s funds from the Pentagon budget to “purchase” these helicopters. Support the Afghan army. In February 2018, the Pentagon asked the legislators to allow them to use the funds “gained” in this transaction to purchase new UH-60M helicopters for the Army itself. Dozens of helicopters were basically handed over to Afghans.
 
Top