• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Don't forget, edwin tong cannot handle pritam Singh dat why raessah khan case went to courts

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
IswaranabehCCB case is so staged and ended amicably, and now they deemed fit to hammer Pitam deep deep to make PAPPPY feels like the entire saga was dealt with impartially - with clear intent to disquality Pitam from standing in the next GE. Talk about hypocrisy.
 

oliverlee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Some how whatever they dish out at bayi they will get it back in a 100% return. Just watch. Evil has eyes
 

birdie69

Alfrescian
Loyal
IswaranabehCCB case is so staged and ended amicably, and now they deemed fit to hammer Pitam deep deep to make PAPPPY feels like the entire saga was dealt with impartially - with clear intent to disquality Pitam from standing in the next GE. Talk about hypocrisy.
I am too focused on this case, totally forgot about Iswaran case!
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
IswaranabehCCB case is so staged and ended amicably, and now they deemed fit to hammer Pitam deep deep to make PAPPPY feels like the entire saga was dealt with impartially - with clear intent to disquality Pitam from standing in the next GE. Talk about hypocrisy.
Fix a "problem" to 立威
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
Recap 2022...


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sc...lee-hsien-loongs-nehru-comments-hit-raw-nerve

India lodged a diplomatic protest with Singapore and its Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) summoned Singapore’s envoy in New Delhi to express its displeasure.


Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Photo: Bloomberg
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Photo: Bloomberg

For the opposition Congress Party, led by Nehru and currently still run by his descendants, it was a time to exult in Lee’s praise for their venerated icon. Nehru was the leader of India’s movement to gain independence from the British and in his speech on Tuesday, Lee praised him and India’s other founding fathers for their “high ideals and noble values”.

The leaders who fought for and won independence are often exceptional individuals of great courage, immense culture, and outstanding ability,” said Lee, who was speaking as part of a debate over a lying scandal relating to the opposition Workers’ Party.

Lee, describing how healthy democracies could “go downhill”, referenced media reports that said 43 per cent of MPs in the current parliament had criminal charges against them, adding that he was aware of talk that these charges were politically motivated. Indeed, the charges are a source of great chagrin for many Indians who believe the political system has become criminalised.


His remarks were widely reported and debated in India, especially on Twitter. All media outlets carried stories on the MEA’s reaction, displaying them prominently on their websites. However, there was little discussion of why Lee’s remarks were especially galling.


Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Photo: AFP
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
iswaran case closed liao lah
The one who offered bribe vs the one who received bribe, which one more serious ? The last time @sbfuncle asked, and the answer obviously is the one who received bribe.

For prosecution to have any real chance of success, the one who offered bribe must be prepared to be a prosecution witness, and when he does, he will not be prosecuted. He becomes 污点证人. Remember they did not charge Cecilia in NBG's case. She was a prosecution witness.

When prosecution decided that they would proceed with Iswaran first, what was the status of OBS ? Waiting to be charged or prosecution witness ? If waiting to be charged, why didn't prosecution proceed with OBS first ? If OBS tio convicted, then that conviction can be used against Iswaran.

If I admit I bribed you or the Court judged that I bribed you, how are you going to defend yourself ?

So it looks like prosecution purposely put the cart before the horse. :frown: It's a big Wayang !
 
Last edited:
Top