- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 16,619
- Points
- 113
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Dongguan UpLorry Completely Dead
- Thread starter Pinkieslut
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 13,116
- Points
- 113
You no point waste time in dongguan, come to Allah's paradise. Awaiting you our libido bro are virgins with glancing eyes, swelling breasts and cheebyes whom no man has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before them.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 5,349
- Points
- 113
Must say a big Thank You to XJP...
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 75,577
- Points
- 113
One bat did all these damage?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
- Messages
- 7,652
- Points
- 113
One of the xi mistake is to crackdown donguan sex city. if he did not crackdown, dongguan can be still flourish with sex trade and hotel and ktv leisure plus there are so many rich chinaman so even with covid pandemic, dongguan sex city still can make money.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 75,577
- Points
- 113
Xi jinping is anti business.
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 18,050
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
- Messages
- 7,652
- Points
- 113
Not really. Donguan sex city shld be most probably backed by jiang zemin. Once xi become president, he want to destroy all jiang zemin clan.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 5,349
- Points
- 113
Ouya was the ultimate undisputed no.1!Ouya, Yihao, Bandao and Mayflower....
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2008
- Messages
- 18,050
- Points
- 113
I wonder if the KTV is still operating. Without the girls of course.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 17,939
- Points
- 113
sex will not go away. They just pivot to somewhere else.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2018
- Messages
- 29,295
- Points
- 113
Why China's dramatic economic recovery might not add up
The country seems to have rebounded, but some analysts believe that at the very least, there is sleight of hand at work
Sun 25 Oct 2020 20.50 AEDT
Under Xi Jinping, China has made some amazing economic gains.
Under Xi Jinping, China has made some amazing economic gains. Photograph: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images
Beijing prompted envy, admiration and not a little resentment when it released data last week confirming that it was the first major economy to start growing again after the devastation caused by Covid-19 in the first half of the year.
China appeared to have achieved the V-shaped recovery being chased by finance ministers around the world, after pioneering mass lockdowns to contain the virus that had taken hold in Wuhan, then shutting its borders to stop it filtering back in from abroad.
With the country largely virus-free, people could return to something like normal life in offices, schools, shops and restaurants, and the government encouraged a splurge in investment across infrastructure and new manufacturing.
Government data showed growth of 4.9% between July and September, slightly lower than economists had expected, but still an astonishing achievement.
Analysts have warned, however, that apparent data manipulation, and the details of how China returned to growth – relying more on investment than consumption – raise questions about the strength and durability of the economic revival.
Nick Marro, lead analyst on global trade at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said the figures appeared to show a shuffling of some data to boost the overall GDP growth rate for the third quarter, although he cautioned there was no direct evidence of any data fabrication.
“The Chinese statistical agency is opaque about their methodology, and unless we get more details about their adjustments, we’ll never know the full story. But there does seem to be evidence of a targeted adjustment to help lift that headline figure,” he said.
“The September figures were smoothed by quietly altering the historic basis of comparison; basically, some of the numbers from September 2019 were re-apportioned into October of that year, in order to lower the comparison base. That led to a statistical distortion where the September 2020 growth figures might’ve been artificially inflated.”
The difference in growth rate was not huge, Marro said, but the manipulation suggested the economy might not be as strong as Beijing would have liked people to think. “The bigger implication is that the investment landscape might be more fragile than the official numbers suggest heading into the last quarter of 2020. That’s perhaps the bigger risk for companies to be aware of.”
Leland Miller, chief executive of the China Beige Book consultancy, which tracks the Chinese economy with data it collects itself in addition to government statistics, flagged up what he considered a far more disturbing alteration in the data.
China recorded growth of 0.8% in fixed-asset investment for the first three quarters of the year, compared with 2019, but the absolute figures for the same period showed a drop of several trillion yuan. “This is not toying at the margin. This is making 2.5 trillion yuan in fixed asset investment disappear,” he said.
The only explanation given by Chinese authorities for the discrepancy was that the data had been adjusted to reflect “results of the fourth national economic census, statistical law enforcement and regulation of statistical programmes”, so economists have no way to assess how accurate the revisions are or compare them to other data.
If fixed-asset investment had actually fallen, as the raw data suggested, while consumption was also down, overall GDP growth could be much lower than the headline figure, Miller said. “There are very big lessons here, because people think that China’s back. They’ve done a pretty good job but ... they’re not anywhere near being back to where they were before.”
Meanwhile the pandemic has pushed many western companies to reconsider their dependence on Chinese factories. And while Beijing has for several years called for a “rebalancing” of the economy to boost domestic consumption, it has struggled to make it a reality.
Other long-term challenges including debt and an ageing population have been overshadowed by coronavirus temporarily, but remain no less problematic.
“Even if growth leaps from a low base next year there are still underlying structural problems,” said George Magnus, former chief economist at UBS, and an associate at the China Centre, Oxford University.
“These include growing debt, demographics, poor productivity, a much more hostile external environment for trade, commerce and investment. All of these things are going to weigh on China’s potential for expansion and development.”
Topics
The country seems to have rebounded, but some analysts believe that at the very least, there is sleight of hand at work
Sun 25 Oct 2020 20.50 AEDT
Under Xi Jinping, China has made some amazing economic gains.
Under Xi Jinping, China has made some amazing economic gains. Photograph: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images
Beijing prompted envy, admiration and not a little resentment when it released data last week confirming that it was the first major economy to start growing again after the devastation caused by Covid-19 in the first half of the year.
China appeared to have achieved the V-shaped recovery being chased by finance ministers around the world, after pioneering mass lockdowns to contain the virus that had taken hold in Wuhan, then shutting its borders to stop it filtering back in from abroad.
With the country largely virus-free, people could return to something like normal life in offices, schools, shops and restaurants, and the government encouraged a splurge in investment across infrastructure and new manufacturing.
Government data showed growth of 4.9% between July and September, slightly lower than economists had expected, but still an astonishing achievement.
Analysts have warned, however, that apparent data manipulation, and the details of how China returned to growth – relying more on investment than consumption – raise questions about the strength and durability of the economic revival.
Nick Marro, lead analyst on global trade at the Economist Intelligence Unit, said the figures appeared to show a shuffling of some data to boost the overall GDP growth rate for the third quarter, although he cautioned there was no direct evidence of any data fabrication.
“The Chinese statistical agency is opaque about their methodology, and unless we get more details about their adjustments, we’ll never know the full story. But there does seem to be evidence of a targeted adjustment to help lift that headline figure,” he said.
“The September figures were smoothed by quietly altering the historic basis of comparison; basically, some of the numbers from September 2019 were re-apportioned into October of that year, in order to lower the comparison base. That led to a statistical distortion where the September 2020 growth figures might’ve been artificially inflated.”
The difference in growth rate was not huge, Marro said, but the manipulation suggested the economy might not be as strong as Beijing would have liked people to think. “The bigger implication is that the investment landscape might be more fragile than the official numbers suggest heading into the last quarter of 2020. That’s perhaps the bigger risk for companies to be aware of.”
Leland Miller, chief executive of the China Beige Book consultancy, which tracks the Chinese economy with data it collects itself in addition to government statistics, flagged up what he considered a far more disturbing alteration in the data.
China recorded growth of 0.8% in fixed-asset investment for the first three quarters of the year, compared with 2019, but the absolute figures for the same period showed a drop of several trillion yuan. “This is not toying at the margin. This is making 2.5 trillion yuan in fixed asset investment disappear,” he said.
The only explanation given by Chinese authorities for the discrepancy was that the data had been adjusted to reflect “results of the fourth national economic census, statistical law enforcement and regulation of statistical programmes”, so economists have no way to assess how accurate the revisions are or compare them to other data.
If fixed-asset investment had actually fallen, as the raw data suggested, while consumption was also down, overall GDP growth could be much lower than the headline figure, Miller said. “There are very big lessons here, because people think that China’s back. They’ve done a pretty good job but ... they’re not anywhere near being back to where they were before.”
Meanwhile the pandemic has pushed many western companies to reconsider their dependence on Chinese factories. And while Beijing has for several years called for a “rebalancing” of the economy to boost domestic consumption, it has struggled to make it a reality.
Other long-term challenges including debt and an ageing population have been overshadowed by coronavirus temporarily, but remain no less problematic.
“Even if growth leaps from a low base next year there are still underlying structural problems,” said George Magnus, former chief economist at UBS, and an associate at the China Centre, Oxford University.
“These include growing debt, demographics, poor productivity, a much more hostile external environment for trade, commerce and investment. All of these things are going to weigh on China’s potential for expansion and development.”
Topics
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
you are kafir
you guarantee won't enter paradise
as for Muslims, only Allah SWT knows who will qualify
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
tiongs prob looked up to pap-pigs for inspiration
on how to manipulate stats
and how to supress slanty masses with daily dose of propaganda and a big stick, so they won't rebel
the numbers just don't add up
158th media and 177th media are not for nothing
Similar threads
