Divzzz: "I Am Not a DOG"

[makapaaa]

Quote...

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?t=7440&page=2

I am not a dog. I believe sex should be in the normal way and for the purpose of expressing love, not unnatural acts, even if it has become legalized to show how open Singapore is trying to become within limits.

Unquote...

Discuss the implications.

 

[snrcitizen]

His quoted statement is an indication of how ancient his brains are. Anyone who chooses to believe what this guy says will be misled back into the age of dinosaurs.

His reference to "normal way" and "unnatural sex" just shows him up as a person of outdated mentallity and inconsistent with one who proclaims his masters can lead us to a brighter future.

In conclusion, what he espouses here is just nothing but PAP propaganda regurgitation as a dog to serve his masters blindly.

Oh dear!

 

[DIVISION1]

I believe sex should be the natural way that it was meant to be. Genes are also very important in determining the future of our offspring. Tolerance does not mean blind acceptance.

 

[kuntakinte]

Do you use condom on a dildo to f88k your own stinking arse ?

I believe sex should be the natural way that it was meant to be. Genes are also very important in determining the future of our offspring. Tolerance does not mean blind acceptance.

 

[makapaaa]

Do you use condom on a dildo to f88k your own stinking arse ?

How does a running dog fxxx itself - with its own tail or kkj?

 

[kuntakinte]

Neither, running dog usually use plastic cock aka dildo !!

How does a running dog fxxx itself - with its own tail or kkj?

 

[makapaaa]

Neither, running dog usually use plastic cock aka dildo !!

Since dogs can only crawl, one supposes the likes of clintonxxx, cassyyy, divzzz and myo### need to help one another to get it inside one another - a classic example of fxxxking one another?

 

[snrcitizen]

I believe sex should be the natural way that it was meant to be. Genes are also very important in determining the future of our offspring. Tolerance does not mean blind acceptance.

Why don't you define to us, in your words, what is "normal way", natural way" and "unnatural sex"? Now you introduce "genes". What gene pool will produce a dog from a human couple?

Then you introduce "tolerance" as against "blind acceptance". Are you now saying what you have been espousing all over this forum is just "tolerance" of your masters? I am sure that most of us here will agree that what you utter is not "tolerance". If it is not "tolerance" then it must surely be "blind acceptance".

Oh dear.