• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Did the Ministry of Home Affairs just spent taxpayers' monies on a sponsored FB post to further whack Parti Liyani?

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://tinyurI.com/y5yfp3m9

8Acm2ke.png
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://tinyurI.com/y5yfp3m9

8Acm2ke.png
Isn't this contempt of court?

The highest court has found Parti not guilty and the judgement clearly faults the prosecution for failure to reveal evidence.

Why is shanmugan blatantly shows contempt on the verdict. Should he not be charged?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
technically, this argument has already been rebutted by defense in the appeal. junk and throwaways had been discarded by the liews, and the maid was supposed to dispose of them, but she kept some as they seemed to be ok with her. that’s not taking items without permission; she became responsible for the disposal of trash and discarded items, thus she could recycle discarded items at will. it’s pointless for diehards and buaykuayans in the spf and agc to double down on their vindictiveness post-appeal, after all the details, arguments, and counter-arguments had been exhaustively examined in court. if they wish to counter now, it’s too late as they had their opportunities in the lengthy appeal hearing process. what a bunch of bozos and childish morons resorting to social media to continue to argue the case.
 
Last edited:

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
technically, this argument has already been rebutted by defense in the appeal. junk and throwaways had been discarded by the liews, and the maid was supposed to dispose of them, but she kept some as they seemed to be ok with her. that’s not taking items without permission; she became responsible for the disposal of trash and discarded items, thus she could recycle discarded items at will. it’s pointless for diehards and buaykuayans in the spf and agc to double down on their vindictiveness post-appeal, after all the details, arguments, and counter-arguments had been exhaustively examined in court. if they wish to counter now, it’s too late as they had their opportunities in the lengthy appeal hearing process. what a bunch of bozos and childish morons resorting to social media to continue to argue the case.
... and paying using taxpayers money to do so...?
 

CPTMiller

Alfrescian
Loyal
The ministry cannot fault their own team.
If they do who will want work and loyal to the dynasty??
Thats why dont hope for 包青天 in this dynasty.
Just be careful doing things and make sure law wont get you.
 
Top