• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Debate on political changes

G

Ginchiyo Tachibana

Guest

Apr 24, 2010
Debate on political changes

<!-- by line --> By Jeremy Au Yong

MEMBERS of Parliament are in two minds over the proposed move to have more alternative voices in Parliament. While they welcome it, they wonder if it could turn out to be a case of quantity over quality. The proposed changes, up for debate on Monday, include increasing the minimum number of Non-Constituency MPs (NCMPs) from three to nine, and entrenching the Nominated MP (NMP) scheme.

NCMPs are the best performers among opposition candidates who lose at the polls; while NMPs, who are not elected, provide alternative, non-partisan views. The two proposals ensure that each Parliament would have at least 18 members who are not from the ruling party. But People's Action Party (PAP) MP Zaqy Mohamad (Hong Kah GRC), is concerned as more voices do not necessarily result in more constructive debate.

Read the full story in Saturday's edition of The Straits Times.


 
Top