• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss
July 12, 2009 by admin
dbs.jpg


Source: Reuters, 10 July 2009

SINGAPORE, July 10 (Reuters) - More than 200 customershave sued Singapore’s DBS Bank in a bid to recover investment losses arising from the collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers.

Siraj Omar, a director at Premier Law, told Reuters on Friday his firm had filed a claim on behalf of 204 investors in a Singapore court. He declined to discuss the case or reveal the size of the claim, which according to the Straits Times newspaper was around S$17 million ($11.6 million).

The investors had purchased a callable basket of credit-linked notes, called High Notes 5, from DBS Bank, a unit of DBS Group, Omar said.


A DBS spokeswoman confirmed receipt of the claim. She said the suit was without merit and that DBS planned to contest the suit, which is the first involving the bank’s High Notes 5 product.

News of the lawsuit had almost no impact on shares of DBS Group, which were up 0.4 percent on Friday morning at S$11.58 in a generally flat stock market.

Financial institutions around the world have been hit by complaints and lawsuits arising from the sale of interest-bearing structured products linked to Lehman that paid higher interest rates than regular savings deposits.

For example, a class action suit was launched in November against UBS in the United States that alleged the Swiss bank had sold Lehman-linked notes as suitable for investors seeking to protect their principal investment.

News of the suit against DBS comes three days after Singapore’s central bank banned DBS and nine other firms from selling structured notes, citing various issues, such as their failure to adequately train the staff who sold such products.

According to a report released by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), DBS which received the shortest ban of six months, had sold over S$100 million worth of High Notes 5 to 1,083 investors that became worthless after Lehman’s collapse.

The bank has to-date paid about S$7.6 million in compensation, the central bank’s report said.

MAS said the failings identified in its investigations “do not automatically mean that the financial institutions are liable to individual investors.
 

Alamaking

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss
July 12, 2009 by admin
dbs.jpg


Source: Reuters, 10 July 2009

SINGAPORE, July 10 (Reuters) - More than 200 customershave sued Singapore’s DBS Bank in a bid to recover investment losses arising from the collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers.

Siraj Omar, a director at Premier Law, told Reuters on Friday his firm had filed a claim on behalf of 204 investors in a Singapore court. He declined to discuss the case or reveal the size of the claim, which according to the Straits Times newspaper was around S$17 million ($11.6 million).

The investors had purchased a callable basket of credit-linked notes, called High Notes 5, from DBS Bank, a unit of DBS Group, Omar said.


A DBS spokeswoman confirmed receipt of the claim. She said the suit was without merit and that DBS planned to contest the suit, which is the first involving the bank’s High Notes 5 product.

News of the lawsuit had almost no impact on shares of DBS Group, which were up 0.4 percent on Friday morning at S$11.58 in a generally flat stock market.

Sounds like PAP, lol :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

Sounds like PAP, lol :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

No way the PAP, I mean DBS will return the money. It is after all the peoples bank :smile:

I think investors have more chance getting their money back if they vote opposition. Maybe thats why this is one of the reasons they don't dare hold early elections.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

No way the PAP, I mean DBS will return the money. It is after all the peoples bank :smile:

I think investors have more chance getting their money back if they vote opposition. Maybe thats why this is one of the reasons they don't dare hold early elections.

Which People's bank?..definitely not the lesser mortal people's bank!:p
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

Which People's bank?..definitely not the lesser mortal people's bank!:p

It is THE people's bank, NOT the peasants bank :biggrin:

Lesser mortals belong to the peasant class lah.

After all thats happened I am really surprised that there are still Sporeans willing to hold accounts with DBS/POSB. :rolleyes:
 

Leegimeremover

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually, not so simple. If the case is argued like another Cheebye Lee case, DBS is vindicated as a government bank hiding behind a public listed company status. While all of PAP dogs may be stupid, the rest of the world and sharks in the world are not. This could have devastating impact on DBS activities overseas. Our friends in Jakarta and Thailand will have a field day.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

Our friends in Jakarta and Thailand will have a field day.

I know a few Indonesians who are angry with DBS because they can't withdraw their term deposites which have matured.

They can't complain publicly otherwise the Indonesian authorities will find out they are hiding money in Spore.

You can add them to DBS's satisfied customers :rolleyes:
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

I know a few Indonesians who are angry with DBS because they can't withdraw their term deposites which have matured.

They can't complain publicly otherwise the Indonesian authorities will find out they are hiding money in Spore.

You can add them to DBS's satisfied customers

Collateral both ways . Nice point .
 

SamuelStalin

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

No way the PAP, I mean DBS will return the money. It is after all the peoples bank :smile:

I think investors have more chance getting their money back if they vote opposition. Maybe thats why this is one of the reasons they don't dare hold early elections.

If opposition wins maybe the bankers will all be dragged to the guillotine amongst a cheering public :p:p:p

Off with their heads!!
 

SamuelStalin

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

It is THE people's bank, NOT the peasants bank :biggrin:

Lesser mortals belong to the peasant class lah.

After all thats happened I am really surprised that there are still Sporeans willing to hold accounts with DBS/POSB. :rolleyes:

If a scattered and small number of people tries to fight silly battles against the establishment, the establishment usually wins.

Just like the Clob fiasco ten years ago in the last recession where angry investors including some mat salleh even fought for justice, against the Malaysian authorities.

What the outcome is we think everyone here is fully aware.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss


Just like the Clob fiasco ten years ago in the last recession where angry investors including some mat salleh even fought for justice, against the Malaysian authorities.

What the outcome is we think everyone here is fully aware.


The CLOB incident showed how irresponsible the Spore authorities were. They ignored the Malaysians warnings that CLOB was illegal & reassured Sporeans it was legal.

When CLOB was closed they said they would go to court to protect the rights of Spore investors & of course they disappeared & Spore investors were left to fend for themselves. LHL then turned around & told the investors that in business there are risks :mad:

The minibond affair is just another case of Spore's world class regulated system :rolleyes:
 

kopikia

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

What's the point of suing when you know what the verdict will be. Just take a look at who is sitting in the board of directors of DBS.
 

takcheksian

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

What's the point of suing when you know what the verdict will be. Just take a look at who is sitting in the board of directors of DBS.

I'm betting the case will even be decided on summary judgment, like all poltiically motivated cases in Singapore.

Obviously Judith Prakash (kangaroo fame) will throw the case out.
:mad::mad::mad:
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Customers sue Singapore’s DBS over investment loss

It's an exercise in futility! But good luck to those who are suing.Obviously, they can well afford to sue!:biggrin::biggrin:
 
Top