• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[ cry cry ] PAP secures over 30% of the vote automatically

8::::::D

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
424
Points
43
The PAP doesn’t even need to hold rallies, they already secure over 30% of the vote before the election begins. Much of that comes from civil servants who fear their votes are being secretly monitored, so they avoid voting for the opposition. Then there’s the grassroots network, those involved in the PA, CC, and RC, who typically back the PAP. Many elderly voters also lean toward the PAP, especially after receiving $1 vouchers or other handouts.

PAP really only need to win over about 15% of the middle class. And that segment usually supports the PAP when they’re in stable, well-paying careers and don’t want disruptions. The well off middle class usually only consider voting for the opposition when they face retrenchment or when their children can’t get into NUS or NTU.
 
Cannot vote for WP because they deprive over a 100 thou voters of their voting rights by backing out of a GRC without prior warning.
.
Cannot vote for the PPP because GMS has ET support.
 
PAP got their own believers, stakeholders and heartland voters. By default they would have secure 40% of the votes against mickey mouse oppositions.

Opposition starting point is around 25%.
 
The PAP doesn’t even need to hold rallies, they already secure over 30% of the vote before the election begins. Much of that comes from civil servants who fear their votes are being secretly monitored, so they avoid voting for the opposition. Then there’s the grassroots network, those involved in the PA, CC, and RC, who typically back the PAP. Many elderly voters also lean toward the PAP, especially after receiving $1 vouchers or other handouts.

PAP really only need to win over about 15% of the middle class. And that segment usually supports the PAP when they’re in stable, well-paying careers and don’t want disruptions. The well off middle class usually only consider voting for the opposition when they face retrenchment or when their children can’t get into NUS or NTU.
In that case opposition should offer civil Servants higher pay and perks.
 
The PAP doesn’t even need to hold rallies, they already secure over 30% of the vote before the election begins. Much of that comes from civil servants who fear their votes are being secretly monitored, so they avoid voting for the opposition. Then there’s the grassroots network, those involved in the PA, CC, and RC, who typically back the PAP. Many elderly voters also lean toward the PAP, especially after receiving $1 vouchers or other handouts.

PAP really only need to win over about 15% of the middle class. And that segment usually supports the PAP when they’re in stable, well-paying careers and don’t want disruptions. The well off middle class usually only consider voting for the opposition when they face retrenchment or when their children can’t get into NUS or NTU.


a lot of old folks had fallen to the vaccine liao..................... :biggrin:

also, when i was a cop............i wasn't alone in hating PAP.............nowadays, people more gutsy liao............
 
If Lee Ah Gong is born in this era, he would say the existing MIW is as good as Lim Yew Hock et al
 
Back
Top