• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Covid Patients Testing Positive After Recovery Aren’t Infectious, Study Shows

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
63,837
Points
113
bloomberg.com

Covid Patients Testing Positive After Recovery Aren’t Infectious, Study Shows
By Heesu Lee and Jason Gale

4-5 minutes


Sign up here for our daily coronavirus newsletter on what you need to know, and subscribe to our Covid-19 podcast for the latest news and analysis.

Researchers are finding evidence that patients who test positive for the coronavirus after recovering aren’t capable of transmitting the infection, and could have the antibodies that prevent them from falling sick again.

Scientists from the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied 285 Covid-19 survivors who had tested positive for the coronavirus after their illness had apparently resolved, as indicated by a previous negative test result. The so-called re-positive patients weren’t found to have spread any lingering infection, and virus samples collected from them couldn’t be grown in culture, indicating the patients were shedding non-infectious or dead virus particles.

The findings, reported late Monday, are a positive sign for regions looking to open up as more patients recover from the pandemic that has sickened at least 4.8 million people. The emerging evidence from South Korea suggests those who have recovered from Covid-19 present no risk of spreading the coronavirus when physical distancing measures are relaxed.

The results mean health authorities in South Korea will no longer consider people infectious after recovering from the illness. Research last month showed that so-called PCR tests for the coronavirus’s nucleic acid can’t distinguish between dead and viable virus particles, potentially giving the wrong impression that someone who tests positive for the virus remains infectious.

Read More: Dead Coronavirus Particles Muddy the Outcome of Test Results
The research may also aid in the debate over antibody tests, which look for markers in the blood that indicate exposure to the novel coronavirus. Experts believe antibodies probably convey some level of protection against the virus, but they don’t have any solid proof yet. Nor do they know how long any immunity may last.
A recent study in Singapore showed that recovered patients from severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, are found to have “significant levels of neutralizing antibodies” nine to 17 years after initial infection, according to researchers including Danielle E. Anderson of Duke-NUS Medical School.

Other scientists have found higher levels of IgM, an antibody that appears in response to exposure to an antigen, in children, according to an article published on medRxiv. That suggests younger populations have the potential to produce a more potent defense against Covid-19. The study has not been certified by peer review.

Revised Protocols

As a result of the findings in the South Korea study, authorities said that under revised protocols, people should no longer be required to test negative for the virus before returning to work or school after they have recovered from their illness and completed their period of isolation.

“Under the new protocols, no additional tests are required for cases that have been discharged from isolation,” the Korean CDC said in a report. The agency said it will now refer to “re-positive” cases as “PCR re-detected after discharge from isolation.”

Some coronavirus patients have tested positive again for the virus up to 82 days after becoming infected. Almost all of the cases for which blood tests were taken had antibodies against the virus.

— With assistance by Peter Pae, and Claire Che
 
Trump said just hours ago. All forms of testings are not without bias. It all boils down to what you are really looking for :D
 




Postscript:
1. Viruses are technically neither dead or alive.
They are not alive, like human beings or bacteria, because they don’t reproduce by themselves or among themselves.
This is sort of like saying stones are not alive bcos one of the critieria for living things is that they can’t reproduce by or among themselves.

2.
Interestingly, soap and water and some non alcohol sanitisers or disinfectants work by pulling the membranes apart.
So we don’t need harsh or powerful chemicals to destroy bacteria and enveloped viruses. Just simple soap and water, mild detergent or mild non alcohol disinfectants will do.


________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


But science and our people has not learn that since they cannot reproduce by or among themselves and are not bacteria, MASK up does not help at all but only lowers our health conditions and natural immunity due to the lag of oxygen, increased fear and anxiety and when our vibration or energy signature is compromised we catch the newly evolved flu (covid) naturally from the environment electromagnetic field itself.

Everything is energy.

Everything is connected since beginning of time.

Separation is the first distortion of life and existence itself.

And.... if [ soap and water and some non alcohol sanitisers or disinfectants work by pulling the membranes apart.
So we don’t need harsh or powerful chemicals to destroy bacteria and enveloped viruses. Just simple soap and water, mild detergent or mild non alcohol disinfectants will do.]

Why is scientist unable to find a counter or cure for something easily destroyed by soap and water ? lol.......... Flu is a natural cure it expels the toxins in our body and fever kills it.
 
Last edited:
bloomberg.com

Covid Patients Testing Positive After Recovery Aren’t Infectious, Study Shows
By Heesu Lee and Jason Gale

4-5 minutes


Sign up here for our daily coronavirus newsletter on what you need to know, and subscribe to our Covid-19 podcast for the latest news and analysis.

Researchers are finding evidence that patients who test positive for the coronavirus after recovering aren’t capable of transmitting the infection, and could have the antibodies that prevent them from falling sick again.

Scientists from the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied 285 Covid-19 survivors who had tested positive for the coronavirus after their illness had apparently resolved, as indicated by a previous negative test result. The so-called re-positive patients weren’t found to have spread any lingering infection, and virus samples collected from them couldn’t be grown in culture, indicating the patients were shedding non-infectious or dead virus particles.

The findings, reported late Monday, are a positive sign for regions looking to open up as more patients recover from the pandemic that has sickened at least 4.8 million people. The emerging evidence from South Korea suggests those who have recovered from Covid-19 present no risk of spreading the coronavirus when physical distancing measures are relaxed.

The results mean health authorities in South Korea will no longer consider people infectious after recovering from the illness. Research last month showed that so-called PCR tests for the coronavirus’s nucleic acid can’t distinguish between dead and viable virus particles, potentially giving the wrong impression that someone who tests positive for the virus remains infectious.

Read More: Dead Coronavirus Particles Muddy the Outcome of Test Results
The research may also aid in the debate over antibody tests, which look for markers in the blood that indicate exposure to the novel coronavirus. Experts believe antibodies probably convey some level of protection against the virus, but they don’t have any solid proof yet. Nor do they know how long any immunity may last.
A recent study in Singapore showed that recovered patients from severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, are found to have “significant levels of neutralizing antibodies” nine to 17 years after initial infection, according to researchers including Danielle E. Anderson of Duke-NUS Medical School.

Other scientists have found higher levels of IgM, an antibody that appears in response to exposure to an antigen, in children, according to an article published on medRxiv. That suggests younger populations have the potential to produce a more potent defense against Covid-19. The study has not been certified by peer review.

Revised Protocols

As a result of the findings in the South Korea study, authorities said that under revised protocols, people should no longer be required to test negative for the virus before returning to work or school after they have recovered from their illness and completed their period of isolation.

“Under the new protocols, no additional tests are required for cases that have been discharged from isolation,” the Korean CDC said in a report. The agency said it will now refer to “re-positive” cases as “PCR re-detected after discharge from isolation.”

Some coronavirus patients have tested positive again for the virus up to 82 days after becoming infected. Almost all of the cases for which blood tests were taken had antibodies against the virus.

— With assistance by Peter Pae, and Claire Che



So Herd Immunity viable ?
1200px-Herd_immunity.svg.png
 
I really hope there won't be mandatory vaccination during 'Phase 3'.
I would not put it past the PAP govt to do exactly that.
'Safe nation' is pure political claptrap, nothing to do with health.

97572054_294416961585249_6350951573577094155_n.jpg
 
Straits times very funny. That infographic for phase 2 looks like a guy waiting to be fucked in the ass.
 
Back
Top