• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Court allows govt appeal

zujjkiol

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
135
Points
0
By Kor Kian Beng

The High Court on Thursday allowed a Government's appeal and convicted five opposition figures for taking part in a street procession in 2007. --PHOTO: AFP

THE High Court on Thursday allowed a Government's appeal and convicted five opposition figures for taking part in a street procession in 2007.

It ordered trial judge John Ng to record the conviction and to hear the mitigation submissions for sentencing later.

The District Judge had cleared the five after a 20-day trial, of walking without a valid permit from Hong Lim Park to the Queenstown Remand Prison on Sept 16, 2007 because he did not consider what they had done a procession..

Three of the five are Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) leaders: chairman Gandhi Ambalam, assistant secretary-general John Tan; and central executive committee member Chee Siok Chin. The other two are SDP supporters Yap Keng Ho and Chong Kai Xiong.

Judge Ng, in his verdict on Oct 6 last year, had noted various dictionary meanings of the word 'procession', such as a group of people moving together; as part of an event like a wedding; and moving in a formal way, in orderly succession and regular formation.

The SDP five had walked mainly on pedestrian pathways, and made ad-hoc stops for toilet breaks and to give out pamphlets. They walked 'casually', sometimes singly, sometimes in pairs or smaller groups, and therefore did not constitute a 'procession'.

Judge Ng also said the walk 'did not cause inconvenience to the public, affect traffic flow or make noise which disturbed the public peace'. This, he noted, 'fortified' his view that the law had not been broken as it was meant to relate to offences against public order and nuisance.

The Government appealed against the acquittal.

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_509268.html :oIo:
 
Trial Judge John Ng is to be commended for applying common sense & common decency.

For sure his days as trial judge would now be numbered as he is due for 'routine transfers' within the Judiciary not amounting to demotion.

Coming to six months since his Oct 09 ruling that the accused were not a 'procession', anyone know if he is still a judge?

Let's see what kind of confounding legalese bullshit the High Court can give to overturn Judge Ng's very sound reasoning why the facts fail the definition of 'procession'.

I am sure again along the lines of Chan Sek Kong's logic of 'lawful loitering because it is inside the polling station'. After all, CJ Chan is the most respected man in Spore according to Reader's Digest Asia.

p.s. UncleYap will be deprived of internet access i the meantime ....... again
 
That's good especially when it's coming from a kangaroo court. :D
 
Back
Top