Could CT scans be fuelling a future rise in cancer cases, as a new study suggests?

[threadfin]

ep stock / Alamy Stock Photo

Could CT scans be fuelling a future rise in cancer cases, as a new study suggests?​

Published: April 16, 2025 9.57am BST

Justin Stebbing, Anglia Ruskin University

CT scans are a vital part of modern medicine. Found in every hospital and many clinics, they give doctors a fast and detailed look inside the body – helping to diagnose everything from cancer and strokes to internal injuries. But a new study suggests there may be a hidden cost to our growing reliance on this technology.

The study, published in Jama Internal Medicine, warns that CT scans performed in the US in 2023 alone could eventually lead to over 100,000 extra cancer cases. If the current rate of scanning continues, the researchers say CT scans could be responsible for around 5% of all new cancers diagnosed each year.

That figure has raised concerns. Especially when you consider that the number of CT scans done in the US has jumped by 30% in just over a decade. In 2023, there were an estimated 93 million CT exams carried out on 62 million people.

The risk from a single scan is low – but not zero. And the younger the patient, the greater the risk. Children and teenagers are especially vulnerable because their bodies are still developing, and any damage caused by ionising radiation may not show up until many years later.

That said, over 90% of CT scans are performed on adults, so it’s this group that faces the largest overall impact. The most common cancers linked to CT exposure are lung, colon, bladder and leukaemia. For women, breast cancer is also a significant concern.

CT scans are associated with lung, colon, bladder, leukaemia, breast and other cancers. Canon2260 / Alamy Stock Photo

What makes this latest estimate so striking is how much it has grown. In 2009, a similar analysis projected around 29,000 future cancers linked to CT scans. The new number is over three times higher – not just because of more scans, but because newer research allows for a more detailed analysis of radiation exposure to specific organs.

The study also makes an eye-catching comparison: if things stay as they are, CT-related cancers could match the number of cancers caused by alcohol or excess weight – two well-known risk factors.

Not all scans carry the same level of risk. In adults, scans of the abdomen and pelvis are thought to contribute the most to future cancer cases. In children, it’s head CTs that pose the biggest concern – especially for babies under the age of one.

Often life-saving​

Despite all this, doctors stress that CT scans are often life-saving and remain essential in many cases. They help catch conditions early, guide treatment and are crucial in emergencies. The challenge is making sure they’re only used when really needed.

Newer technologies could help reduce the risk. Photon-counting CT scanners, for example, deliver lower doses of radiation, and MRI scans don’t use radiation at all. The researchers suggest that better use of diagnostic checklists could also help doctors decide when a scan is necessary, and when a safer alternative like MRI or ultrasound might do the job.

It’s worth noting that this study doesn’t prove CT scans cause cancer in individual people. The estimates are based on “risk models” – not direct evidence. In fact, the American College of Radiology points out that no study has yet linked CT scans directly to cancer in humans, even after multiple scans.

Still, the idea that radiation can cause cancer isn’t new. It’s scientifically sound. And with the huge number of scans being done, even small risks can add up.

CT scans save lives, but they’re not risk-free. As medical technology evolves, so too should the way we use it. By cutting down on unnecessary scans, using safer alternatives where possible, and keeping radiation doses as low as practical, we can ensure CT scans continue to help more than they harm.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

Sounds like an article to promote MRI?

 

[threadfin]

Sounds like an article to promote MRI?

Yes, MRI is generally considered better than CT scans at detecting strokes, especially acute ischemic strokes, and is often used to confirm the diagnosis and assess the severity of the stroke. However, CT scans are often used initially in stroke cases due to their speed and availability, according to Supreme Vascular and Interventional Clinic.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

MRI Advantages:

• Higher Sensitivity:
  MRI is more sensitive than CT in detecting ischemic stroke, meaning it's better at finding smaller or more subtle brain changes caused by stroke.
  
  
• Detailed Images:
  MRI provides more detailed images of brain tissue, blood vessels, and arteries, which can be crucial in determining the extent of damage and the type of stroke.
  
  
• No Radiation:
  MRI uses magnetic fields and radio waves, so there's no risk of radiation exposure.
  
  
• Detects Scar Tissue:
  MRI can show scarring left behind by previous strokes, which can be helpful in understanding a patient's stroke history.
  
  
• Distinguishes Stroke from Stroke-Mocks:
  MRI is better at differentiating between stroke and conditions that mimic stroke symptoms, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
  
  
• Quantifies Ischemic Core:
  MRI can help quantify the area of brain tissue that has been damaged by the stroke (the ischemic core), which can be important for treatment decisions.
  
  
• Estimates Stroke Onset:
  MRI can help estimate the time since the stroke occurred, particularly when the onset time is unknown, according to the American Heart Association Journals.
  
  
• Diffusion-Perfusion Mismatch:
  MRI techniques like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) can show the mismatch between tissue damage and blood flow, helping to identify potentially salvageable tissue.

CT Scan Advantages:

• Speed and Availability:
  CT scans are generally faster and more widely available than MRI, according to Supreme Vascular and Interventional Clinic.
  
  
• Acute Hemorrhage Detection:
  CT scans are good at detecting brain bleeds (hemorrhagic strokes), especially in the acute phase.
  
  
• Early Use in Emergencies:
  Due to their speed and availability, CT scans are often used as the first imaging test in emergency situations to rule out hemorrhagic stroke and assess the overall condition.

In Summary:

While MRI is generally more accurate and provides more detailed information about stroke, CT scans are preferred initially due to their speed and availability, especially in acute situations. Both tests play important roles in stroke diagnosis and management, with MRI often used for further assessment and planning of treatment.

 

[cocobobo]

Ignorance is bliss. Quick exit, no dragging chemos.