• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Compraints Against Tiger Airliner On Rise!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
See how the 154th wanna lump all the players together when only the Papaya-linked stooges are the real troublemakers.

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Complaints against budget airlines rise
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><TR>Gripes include inability to contact airline, poor communication of flight changes, overcharging </TR><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Karamjit Kaur, Aviation Correspondent
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->AS THE popularity of budget flights soars during these tough economic times, customer service is taking a nosedive.
The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said complaints against budget carriers are on the rise.
Between January and last month, 71 of the 107 airline-related cases dealt with were about low-cost carriers.
The total number of grievances is up too.
Last year, the association received 281 complaints against airlines. Of this, 157 were related to low-cost carriers.
Top peeves of budget travellers: unable to contact the airlines; being overcharged; not told of flight changes and cancellations; and refunds promised but not given, among others.
When political tempers flared in Bangkok earlier this month, communications executive Ion Danker and a group of friends decided to postpone their holiday.
Booked to fly on Singapore's Tiger Airways, they called and e-mailed the airline to change their flights but their queries went unanswered. In the end, they went to the airport to sort the matter out.
Mr Danker, 30, who paid about $400 for a pair of return tickets, said: 'In the end, we managed to book new flights for end-June, but now the airline says I have to pay a total penalty of $250.
'Surely in this case, the charge should be waived. After all, Thailand declared a state of emergency and Singapore's Ministry of Foreign Affairs had advised travellers to Bangkok to postpone their trips.'
Tiger's spokesman said the airline's policy is to waive the amendment fee if the new flight date is within seven days of the original scheduled date.
There is no charge too if travellers opt to go elsewhere although fare top-ups, if any, still apply.
Jetstar Asia, a subsidiary of Qantas Airways, waived its amendment fee of $40 per leg during Bangkok's turmoil, as long as customers travelled by last Sunday.
The information, as well as the number to call to make itinerary changes, was displayed on its website.
When such things happen, many airlines typically allow a two-week grace period from the original flight date booked.
Apart from political crises and other such unforeseen circumstances, industry watchers expect that the economic downturn in general will lead to a higher number of complaints from air travellers.
This is because as airlines drop flights, cut capacity and revise schedules due to falling traffic numbers, not all carriers will be as effective in keeping customers abreast of changes.
When flights are rescheduled or cancellations happen, the consumer is in a 'lose-lose' position, said Case executive director Seah Seng Choon.
He said: 'What airlines should do is to inform the consumers as early as possible...and offer alternatives for the consumers.'
Compared to low-cost carriers, full-service airlines like Singapore Airlines and Cathay Pacific are usually better placed to do this, with their wide network of partner airlines.
For Mr Danker, the lesson learnt is this: 'Budget airlines are great if all that is involved is booking the ticket, getting on the flight and flying off.
'But when something happens, everything is in a mess and it can be very frustrating.' [email protected]
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
hahahah.. During the Thailand airport closure.

Tiger Airways do not even have rescue flight and that shows the flaw they are in.

Jetstar and airasia are real airline that do honest business, both started rescue flight immediately after the airport closure. They take care of customer and are serious in their business. Those PAP losers here who try to protect the name of Tiger here are all bashed by me. WHAHHAH!!! When you took a sinkie airline, that is what you get, nothing but trouble and lost.

I have long suspected of Tiger. THat is what happen when they use sinkie govt funds to operate even though they dunno how to do business.
 
Top