• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Comedian Mahathir Wants to be King of Islamic World ... Wait for 1SGD to 5RM soon!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
16,900
Points
113
Malaysia summit seeks to challenge Saudi Arabia’s Islamic leadership
2 weeks ago

Veteran Arab journalist Abdel Bari Atwan says an Islamic conference in Malaysia aims to challenge the leadership of Saudi Arabia over the Islamic world.
The Islamic summit which opened in the Malaysian capital Kuala Lumpur on Thursday, attended by leaders from some 20 Muslim-majority countries, is a significant development in two main respects. It sets the stage for the establishment of an alternative to the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) as the collective voice of the world’s Muslims, and challenges Saudi Arabia’s long-assumed status as leader of the Islamic world.
So a new claimant to global “Islamic” leadership is taking shape and it excludes most of the Arab world. Major Arab countries such as Egypt, Morocco, Sudan, and Algeria are among those staying away from the Kuala Lumpur summit, in addition to Syria and Iraq.
This gathering was dealt a setback when Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who along with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Malaysian Premier Mahathir Mohamed was one of its prime movers, decided not to attend, depriving the bloc-in-the making of a nuclear-armed member
.
Imran Khan
He canceled his attendance after making a surprise visit to Riyadh for reasons which remain unknown but most observers attribute to financial inducements. However, the gathering’s pan-Islamic representative status is bolstered by the attendance of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, which affirms its non-sectarian and inclusive nature.
It includes the worlds’ five largest non-Arab Muslim majority countries – Indonesia, Pakistan, Turkey, Iran, and Malaysia – with a combined population of more than 600 million and an area of 6 million square kilometers.
Turkish presidential advisor Yasin Aktai, who is described as the ideologue of the endeavor to form a new bloc of Islamic states, also points out that the participants, for the most part, do not have oil-dependent economies, and pursue development and growth strategies based on their human resources.
He implicitly acknowledges that they are effectively rebelling against Arab leadership of the Islamic world. Asked to explain the exclusion of Arab leaders from the summit, he retorts: “Where are they anyway? They’re never there when Islam and Muslims are in danger and under threat from Islamophobia… They’re never there when this threat is a problem for which we need a solution. We started to see that their actions fuel hostility to Islam.”
Aktai’s harsh words reflect sad reality. The Arab part of the Islamic world is in worse shape than ever: laid low by divisions, feuds, wars, corruption, dictatorship, repression, and complete subservience to Western and especially American imperialism, with many of its leaders prostrating themselves at the feet of the Israeli enemy, offering it normalisation and alliances.
Arab response
The Arab response to the Kuala Lumpur summit should not be to mobilise media trolls to fire abuse and insults at the leaders attending the gathering. That is the course of the impotent and bankrupt. It should take the form of reappraisal and self-criticism, to understand the causes of the side-lining of some 20 Arab states headed by Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s two most sacred places in Mecca and Medinah.
For Saudi Arabia to preserve its leadership of the Islamic world it would have to abandon most of its current policies, including its war in Yemen and its utter subservience to the USA, and stand up for just Muslim causes, most notably Palestine.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia
The OIC, which this Kuala Lumpur summit seeks to bypass and replace, has been turned into a title devoid of any substance. It has nothing to do with Islamic cooperation as it sides fully with its host state. It is neither impartial nor objective and has effectively become a department of the Saudi foreign ministry, whose sole occupation is to issue statements that are never read by anyone other than those who write them, and even that is doubtful.
Any country that seeks to be a leader of the Islamic world has to set an example in every respect – in development, democracy, respect for human rights, upholding national sovereignty, good governance and uprooting corruption. It must also work toward bringing Muslims together and unflinchingly stand up for them when they are persecuted and support their just causes.
Saudi Arabia, in particular, should be warned that more than its status and prestige are at stake. Questions are increasingly being asked about its custodianship of the two Holy Places, and demands made for them to be brought under Islamic supervision. Serious thought is being give to this, and the Kuala Lumpur summit could be the start.
 
This Mahathir want to be the King of Muslim world. He must be smoking some sort of Weed.

Does he have the huge pocket?
Does he have the influence?
 
Well, Saudi Arabia possesses those historical Islamic sites, and makes a fortune from those pilgrimages.

What does Malaysia have? The Petronas Towers? You climb the stairs to the top to complete your hajj? :roflmao:
 
This Mahathir want to be the King of Muslim world. He must be smoking some sort of Weed.

Does he have the huge pocket?
Does he have the influence?

Who said that?

don't believe tabloids.

or opinion pieces.

and don't fall for concerted misinformation campaigns by the CIA Mossad MI6 and the 5 eye countries.
 
Well, Saudi Arabia possesses those historical Islamic sites, and makes a fortune from those pilgrimages.

What does Malaysia have? The Petronas Towers? You climb the stairs to the top to complete your hajj? :roflmao:

they are not under al Saud regime's possession.

They are owned by the entire Islamic world. From any part or region of the world, Muslims can visit Makkah or Madinah.

Nothing to do with Al Saud regime, which is propped up by the Yankees.

As Trump said, Al Saud regime would not even survive 2 weeks without yankee backing.

The attack on their oil refinery taking out 50% of their production showed that well.
 
What needs to happen is for Iran and Turkey to keep their differences apart and work on the commonalities, which are plenty.

As many Muslim leaders have explained. when kuffar attack Muslims, they don't care who is Sunni, who is Shia and who is whatever other variety of whatever sect or other group that is accused of being deviant by stooge/pliant regimes of the West installed in the Middle East and around the world.

At one stage, Pakistan needs to be roped in.

Then, the three countries together would host about 360 million people, or more.

1. Under a mutual defence treaty, where an attack on one country by any country or group or entity is an attack on all countries within the pact, all three countries can first and foremost enjoy peace, stability and security.

With peace, stability, security, justice, transparency and accountability, these countries can pursue joint projects in various spheres and of course, provide 'nuclear umbrella' - any entity that threatens or attacks a country under the TIP (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan) 'nuclear umbrella' would get nuked in return.

Sanctions would not work.

There is a critical mass (of population, talent, market, landmass, resources, location, military might and most importantly, contiguous landmass, which makes it all that much easier). All three countries also host the highest numbers of Caucasoids out of all Muslim majority countries, not a surprise that these 3 countries are the strongest militarily and that Iran and Turkey are the most independent countries out of the 57 Muslim majority OIC members.


If the Al Saud/MBZ regime threatens Pakistan again, Pakistan should immediately send three army corps to Qatar.

Turkey should send three army corps equivalent troops to Qatar, too and the three TIP (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan) countries can conduct joint naval, aerial and (ballistic/other) missile exercises in the Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, the Eastern Mediterranean regions simultaneously to send a message loud and clear. Iran need not send any army corp to Qatar because the entire Gulf is just next door.

Those dictatorial regimes know very well that, lacking popular support, they won't last a fight against any semi-competent adversary.

As most opportunistic appointees in the armed forces will desert at the first opportunity and the oppressed public will topple the kingdoms when an opportunity arises.

The three contiguous Muslim majority countries of TIP (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan) can ensure that, by signing a mutual defence treaty, and providing a 'nuclear umbrella' to allied countries (perhaps, Qatar and Azerbaijan would like to be inaugural members of this club) no superpower from outside the region will dare to intervene.

The most pressing issue for the entire Muslim world is lack of a mutual defence treaty, and along with it, 'nuclear umbrella', meaning that any place on the planet can be nuked at a 'moment's notice', repeatedly, with thermonuclear devices.

As simple as that.

Once this issue is settled, the bulk of the problems can be sorted out one by one, Insha Allah.
 
What needs to happen is for Iran and Turkey to keep their differences apart and work on the commonalities, which are plenty.

As many Muslim leaders have explained. when kuffar attack Muslims, they don't care who is Sunni, who is Shia and who is whatever other variety of whatever sect or other group that is accused of being deviant by stooge/pliant regimes of the West installed in the Middle East and around the world.

At one stage, Pakistan needs to be roped in.

Then, the three countries together would host about 360 million people, or more.

1. Under a mutual defence treaty, where an attack on one country by any country or group or entity is an attack on all countries within the pact, all three countries can first and foremost enjoy peace, stability and security.

With peace, stability, security, justice, transparency and accountability, these countries can pursue joint projects in various spheres and of course, provide 'nuclear umbrella' - any entity that threatens or attacks a country under the TIP (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan) 'nuclear umbrella' would get nuked in return.

Sanctions would not work.

There is a critical mass (of population, talent, market, landmass, resources, location, military might and most importantly, contiguous landmass, which makes it all that much easier). All three countries also host the highest numbers of Caucasoids out of all Muslim majority countries, not a surprise that these 3 countries are the strongest militarily and that Iran and Turkey are the most independent countries out of the 57 Muslim majority OIC members.


If the Al Saud/MBZ regime threatens Pakistan again, Pakistan should immediately send three army corps to Qatar.

Turkey should send three army corps equivalent troops to Qatar, too and the three TIP (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan) countries can conduct joint naval, aerial and (ballistic/other) missile exercises in the Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, the Eastern Mediterranean regions simultaneously to send a message loud and clear. Iran need not send any army corp to Qatar because the entire Gulf is just next door.

Those dictatorial regimes know very well that, lacking popular support, they won't last a fight against any semi-competent adversary.

As most opportunistic appointees in the armed forces will desert at the first opportunity and the oppressed public will topple the kingdoms when an opportunity arises.

The three contiguous Muslim majority countries of TIP (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan) can ensure that, by signing a mutual defence treaty, and providing a 'nuclear umbrella' to allied countries (perhaps, Qatar and Azerbaijan would like to be inaugural members of this club) no superpower from outside the region will dare to intervene.

The most pressing issue for the entire Muslim world is lack of a mutual defence treaty, and along with it, 'nuclear umbrella', meaning that any place on the planet can be nuked at a 'moment's notice', repeatedly, with thermonuclear devices.

As simple as that.

Once this issue is settled, the bulk of the problems can be sorted out one by one, Insha Allah.

lol . More comedy here.
 
Back
Top