- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 1,583
- Points
- 48
This is 50 ton giant 24m long 1.6 meter diameter. Powered by a mini nuclear reactor carry a huge nuke that can go from Russia via ocean to USA.
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2018-01-25/doc-ifyqwiqk6429269.shtml
俄罗斯水下杀手射程高达一万千米 隐蔽性强过洲际导弹
2018年01月25日 16:58 新浪军事
0
在2015年9月，当斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统被俄罗斯军方“不经意”间曝光时，外界甚至以怀疑的眼光来看待这种古怪的武器。而在近日，美国最新起草的《核态势评估》草案证实了这种武器的存在。那么，斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统究竟是一种什么样的武器，它有什么优势和劣势呢？
斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统实质上是一种超远程的无人潜航器。从体积上看，这种武器是个非常巨大的家伙，其长度达到了24米，直径为1.6米。俄罗斯的“布拉瓦”潜射弹道导弹长度为12.1米，直径是2米。斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统没有“布拉瓦”导弹粗，长度是其足足两倍。普通的重型鱼雷直径为533毫米，长度为7.2米，仅仅从容积来计算，斯塔图斯-6相当于其27倍。
根据俄罗斯军方公布的信息，斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统的最大射程可达到1万千米，其实这个射程应该称作航程更合理一些。这么大的家伙，如果采用常规推进形式，根本没办法跑这么远。因此，斯塔图斯-6内部有个小型的核反应堆，而且采用的是泵喷推进形式。，最大速度可达到100节。
战斗部方面，曾经有消息指出该武器有能力投送总当量为1亿吨的钴弹。不过实际上，钴弹这种末日武器仅仅存在于内尔·舒特的小说之中，因为普通的核武器威力已经很大了，所以这种猜测被视为脑洞大开，以至于外界其他一些专家甚至怀疑到斯塔图斯-6本身，认为这种武器压根就是俄罗斯在吹牛皮。而美国最新的《核态势评估》草案予以证实，某种程度上也为其正了名。
即便斯塔图斯-6没有装备钴弹这种所谓的末日武器，其威力也足够大，如果在濒海地区引爆，足以摧毁附近的城市、引发海啸和导致大规模的放射性尘埃。俄罗斯研制的这种武器，目前至少已经展开过一次发射试验，它既存在着合理性，但同时也有很大的不足。
不管是美国，还是曾经的苏联或今日的俄罗斯，都投入了极大的精力来发展预警体系和拦截系统。而在大气层内外以极高速度飞行的洲际导弹，成为双方防御和关注的焦点。相比之下，对于超远程无人潜航器的防御，目前仍处于初始阶段。按照俄罗斯方面给出的数据，斯塔图斯-6的最大潜深可达到1千米，这已经超过很多潜艇和鱼雷攻击深度的极限了。所以从目前来看，斯塔图斯-6在大洋中航行是相对安全的。
再则，如今的反潜技术已经非常发达，然而在面对潜艇时仍然显得很苍白。例如在2017年搜救阿根廷“圣胡安”号常规潜艇的过程中，各国都出动了许多高精尖装备，但迄今为止仍然没有找到。同潜艇相比，斯塔图斯-6的体积很小，静音能力也相对较强，因此同洲际导弹相比，具有隐蔽性更强的特点。
另一方面，斯塔图斯-6这种武器也存在着很大的问题。首先是其最大速度为100节左右，也就是说它如果要在极限射程上发起攻击，那么至少得需要4天多的时间才能抵达目标区域。其次，虽然斯塔图斯-6因为具有大潜深的特性，但在濒海地区却并不是没有办法反制。考虑到俄罗斯的对手美国拥有极强的立体反潜能力，虽然无法处处设防，而对重点城市的濒海区域实施布防是可行的。
第三，同洲际导弹相比，斯塔图斯-6只能攻击濒海港口和城市，却无法用于攻击内陆区域，而洲际导弹发射井往往就在这些地方。所以就存在着这样的一个悖论，一旦美国发现或已经遭到攻击，就会发起报复性的核打击，那么斯塔图斯-6还在海上跑的时候，很有可能双方的核战争就已经结束。
最后需要指出的是，类似于斯塔图斯-6这样的无人潜航器，其实美国也有。美国的“回声航海家”无人潜航器是一种重量高达50吨的庞然巨物，能够从旧金山一直开到太平洋彼岸的香港。这意味着，只要美国愿意，同样也可发展出类似的携带核战斗部的无人潜航器。斯塔图斯-6是俄罗斯别出心裁的产品，但它打破了平衡。在相互确保摧毁的前提下，很有可能是又一种然而并无什么用处的武器。
（作者署名：云上的空母）
https://www.defensenews.com/space/2...ne-is-real-and-in-the-nuclear-posture-review/
Naval
Russia’s nuclear underwater drone is real and in the Nuclear Posture Review
By: Valerie Insinna January 12
AddThis Sharing Buttons
draft of the Pentagon’s Nuclear Posture Review confirms the existence of an underwater nuclear drone made and operated by Russia, a capability the U.S. Defense Department had not previously publicly acknowledged.
“In addition to modernizing ‘legacy’ Soviet nuclear systems, Russia is developing and deploying new nuclear warheads and launchers,” stated an unclassified draft of the nuclear posture review first published by the Huffington Post.
“These efforts include multiple upgrades for every leg of the Russian nuclear triad of strategic bombers, sea-based missiles and land-based missiles. Russia is also developing at least two new intercontinental range systems, a hypersonic glide vehicle and a new intercontinental, nuclear-armed undersea autonomous torpedo.”
/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/WSXCBIK6OBHCNFRP2YYSX33SHQ.png)
A chart laying out Russian nuclear delivery vehicles developed over the past decade spells out the capability yet again, including a small illustration for an “AUV,” or autonomous underwater vehicle, called Status-6.
The black and white graphic posted by the Huffington Post makes it difficult to see whether the capability has been deployed. However, the Russian undersea drone — which is nicknamed “Kanyon” by the Pentagon and goes by the full name Ocean Multipurpose System Status-6 — has been tested at least once.
Nuclear Posture Review draft leaks; new weapons coming amid strategic shift
The draft reaffirms the need for a full nuclear triad and appears to be in line, at least somewhat, with President Trump’s public desires.
By: Aaron Mehta
On Nov. 27, 2016, U.S. intelligence detected Status-6 after it was launched from a Sarov-class submarine used to test and validate new tech, the Washington Free Beacon reported in December 2016, citing unnamed Pentagon sources.
Russian reports indicate it could be outfitted with a 100-megaton nuclear warhead.
Sign up for our Daily News Roundup
The top Defense News stories of the day
Status-6 was built by Rubin Design Bureau, the largest of Russia’s three submarine manufacturers. According to a document shown on Russian television, the drone has a range of 6,200 miles, a top speed in excess of 56 knots and can descend to depths of 3,280 feet below sea level, the Beacon reported.
It was designed to be launched from at least two different classes of nuclear submarines, including the Oscar-class, which can carry four Status-6 drones at a time.
The nuclear posture review reaffirms the United States’ commitment to the nuclear triad — or the country’s inventory of ballistic missile submarines, ICBMs and nuclear-capable bombers — but offers no sign that the Pentagon is interested in developing unmanned undersea vehicles capable of delivering a nuclear weapon.
However, it has been widely speculated that the Air Force’s newest bomber, the B-21 currently under development, could be optionally manned.
While the final draft of the Nuclear Posture Review could remove references to the Status-6 program, it appears the Pentagon confirmed the existence of the weapon as a way to illustrate what it sees as major advantage of the Russian nuclear weapons program: its diversity.
The review notes that Russia is increasing the number of platforms that could be equipped either with a nuclear or conventional payload, allowing it to expand its nuclear arsenal without violating the New START treaty. It is also developing a ground-launched cruise missile and has multiple classes of nuclear submarines and varieties of ICBMs and air-launched cruise missiles.
The United States is concerned about Russia’s continued development of “increasingly diverse and expanding nuclear capabilities,” especially coupled with Moscow’s perception that it could conduct a nuclear attack as a way to “ ’de-escalate’ a conflict on terms favorable to Russia,” the review stated.
“These mistaken perceptions increase the prospect for dangerous miscalculation and escalation.”
This was the famous deliberately leaked idea in 2015 to make Obama sleepless.
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2018-01-25/doc-ifyqwiqk6429269.shtml
俄罗斯水下杀手射程高达一万千米 隐蔽性强过洲际导弹
2018年01月25日 16:58 新浪军事
0
在2015年9月，当斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统被俄罗斯军方“不经意”间曝光时，外界甚至以怀疑的眼光来看待这种古怪的武器。而在近日，美国最新起草的《核态势评估》草案证实了这种武器的存在。那么，斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统究竟是一种什么样的武器，它有什么优势和劣势呢？
斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统实质上是一种超远程的无人潜航器。从体积上看，这种武器是个非常巨大的家伙，其长度达到了24米，直径为1.6米。俄罗斯的“布拉瓦”潜射弹道导弹长度为12.1米，直径是2米。斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统没有“布拉瓦”导弹粗，长度是其足足两倍。普通的重型鱼雷直径为533毫米，长度为7.2米，仅仅从容积来计算，斯塔图斯-6相当于其27倍。
根据俄罗斯军方公布的信息，斯塔图斯-6海上多用途系统的最大射程可达到1万千米，其实这个射程应该称作航程更合理一些。这么大的家伙，如果采用常规推进形式，根本没办法跑这么远。因此，斯塔图斯-6内部有个小型的核反应堆，而且采用的是泵喷推进形式。，最大速度可达到100节。
战斗部方面，曾经有消息指出该武器有能力投送总当量为1亿吨的钴弹。不过实际上，钴弹这种末日武器仅仅存在于内尔·舒特的小说之中，因为普通的核武器威力已经很大了，所以这种猜测被视为脑洞大开，以至于外界其他一些专家甚至怀疑到斯塔图斯-6本身，认为这种武器压根就是俄罗斯在吹牛皮。而美国最新的《核态势评估》草案予以证实，某种程度上也为其正了名。
即便斯塔图斯-6没有装备钴弹这种所谓的末日武器，其威力也足够大，如果在濒海地区引爆，足以摧毁附近的城市、引发海啸和导致大规模的放射性尘埃。俄罗斯研制的这种武器，目前至少已经展开过一次发射试验，它既存在着合理性，但同时也有很大的不足。
不管是美国，还是曾经的苏联或今日的俄罗斯，都投入了极大的精力来发展预警体系和拦截系统。而在大气层内外以极高速度飞行的洲际导弹，成为双方防御和关注的焦点。相比之下，对于超远程无人潜航器的防御，目前仍处于初始阶段。按照俄罗斯方面给出的数据，斯塔图斯-6的最大潜深可达到1千米，这已经超过很多潜艇和鱼雷攻击深度的极限了。所以从目前来看，斯塔图斯-6在大洋中航行是相对安全的。
再则，如今的反潜技术已经非常发达，然而在面对潜艇时仍然显得很苍白。例如在2017年搜救阿根廷“圣胡安”号常规潜艇的过程中，各国都出动了许多高精尖装备，但迄今为止仍然没有找到。同潜艇相比，斯塔图斯-6的体积很小，静音能力也相对较强，因此同洲际导弹相比，具有隐蔽性更强的特点。
另一方面，斯塔图斯-6这种武器也存在着很大的问题。首先是其最大速度为100节左右，也就是说它如果要在极限射程上发起攻击，那么至少得需要4天多的时间才能抵达目标区域。其次，虽然斯塔图斯-6因为具有大潜深的特性，但在濒海地区却并不是没有办法反制。考虑到俄罗斯的对手美国拥有极强的立体反潜能力，虽然无法处处设防，而对重点城市的濒海区域实施布防是可行的。
第三，同洲际导弹相比，斯塔图斯-6只能攻击濒海港口和城市，却无法用于攻击内陆区域，而洲际导弹发射井往往就在这些地方。所以就存在着这样的一个悖论，一旦美国发现或已经遭到攻击，就会发起报复性的核打击，那么斯塔图斯-6还在海上跑的时候，很有可能双方的核战争就已经结束。
最后需要指出的是，类似于斯塔图斯-6这样的无人潜航器，其实美国也有。美国的“回声航海家”无人潜航器是一种重量高达50吨的庞然巨物，能够从旧金山一直开到太平洋彼岸的香港。这意味着，只要美国愿意，同样也可发展出类似的携带核战斗部的无人潜航器。斯塔图斯-6是俄罗斯别出心裁的产品，但它打破了平衡。在相互确保摧毁的前提下，很有可能是又一种然而并无什么用处的武器。
（作者署名：云上的空母）
https://www.defensenews.com/space/2...ne-is-real-and-in-the-nuclear-posture-review/
- Air
- Land
- Naval
- Pentagon
- Congress
- Cyber
- C4ISR
- Space
- Training & Sim
- Global
- Industry
- Interviews
- 2017 Top 100 Companies
- Outlook
- Thought Leadership
- TV/Video
- Newsletters
- Early Bird Brief
- © 2018 Sightline Media Group
Naval
Russia’s nuclear underwater drone is real and in the Nuclear Posture Review
By: Valerie Insinna January 12
AddThis Sharing Buttons
draft of the Pentagon’s Nuclear Posture Review confirms the existence of an underwater nuclear drone made and operated by Russia, a capability the U.S. Defense Department had not previously publicly acknowledged.
“In addition to modernizing ‘legacy’ Soviet nuclear systems, Russia is developing and deploying new nuclear warheads and launchers,” stated an unclassified draft of the nuclear posture review first published by the Huffington Post.
“These efforts include multiple upgrades for every leg of the Russian nuclear triad of strategic bombers, sea-based missiles and land-based missiles. Russia is also developing at least two new intercontinental range systems, a hypersonic glide vehicle and a new intercontinental, nuclear-armed undersea autonomous torpedo.”
A chart laying out Russian nuclear delivery vehicles developed over the past decade spells out the capability yet again, including a small illustration for an “AUV,” or autonomous underwater vehicle, called Status-6.
The black and white graphic posted by the Huffington Post makes it difficult to see whether the capability has been deployed. However, the Russian undersea drone — which is nicknamed “Kanyon” by the Pentagon and goes by the full name Ocean Multipurpose System Status-6 — has been tested at least once.
Nuclear Posture Review draft leaks; new weapons coming amid strategic shift
The draft reaffirms the need for a full nuclear triad and appears to be in line, at least somewhat, with President Trump’s public desires.
By: Aaron Mehta
On Nov. 27, 2016, U.S. intelligence detected Status-6 after it was launched from a Sarov-class submarine used to test and validate new tech, the Washington Free Beacon reported in December 2016, citing unnamed Pentagon sources.
Russian reports indicate it could be outfitted with a 100-megaton nuclear warhead.
Sign up for our Daily News Roundup
The top Defense News stories of the day
Status-6 was built by Rubin Design Bureau, the largest of Russia’s three submarine manufacturers. According to a document shown on Russian television, the drone has a range of 6,200 miles, a top speed in excess of 56 knots and can descend to depths of 3,280 feet below sea level, the Beacon reported.
It was designed to be launched from at least two different classes of nuclear submarines, including the Oscar-class, which can carry four Status-6 drones at a time.
The nuclear posture review reaffirms the United States’ commitment to the nuclear triad — or the country’s inventory of ballistic missile submarines, ICBMs and nuclear-capable bombers — but offers no sign that the Pentagon is interested in developing unmanned undersea vehicles capable of delivering a nuclear weapon.
However, it has been widely speculated that the Air Force’s newest bomber, the B-21 currently under development, could be optionally manned.
While the final draft of the Nuclear Posture Review could remove references to the Status-6 program, it appears the Pentagon confirmed the existence of the weapon as a way to illustrate what it sees as major advantage of the Russian nuclear weapons program: its diversity.
The review notes that Russia is increasing the number of platforms that could be equipped either with a nuclear or conventional payload, allowing it to expand its nuclear arsenal without violating the New START treaty. It is also developing a ground-launched cruise missile and has multiple classes of nuclear submarines and varieties of ICBMs and air-launched cruise missiles.
The United States is concerned about Russia’s continued development of “increasingly diverse and expanding nuclear capabilities,” especially coupled with Moscow’s perception that it could conduct a nuclear attack as a way to “ ’de-escalate’ a conflict on terms favorable to Russia,” the review stated.
“These mistaken perceptions increase the prospect for dangerous miscalculation and escalation.”
This was the famous deliberately leaked idea in 2015 to make Obama sleepless.
