• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chinese or indian marriage destroyed by a malay muslim sex kitten.

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Muslims cannot be involved in non-Muslim marriage disputes, rules court
FMT Reporters
-
July 6, 2020 5:06 PM
1.6kShares
facebook sharing button
1.4k
twitter sharing button
79
whatsapp sharing button

sharethis sharing button

gavel-afp-131118-1.jpg
The Court of Appeal did not not provide the grounds for its decision to overturn the High Court ruling. (AFP pic)
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal here today ruled that a Muslim cannot be made a party in a matrimonial dispute involving non-Muslim couples.
A three-member bench chaired by Kamardin Hashim said this in setting aside a High Court ruling last year that Muslims could be included as co-respondents in a petition for judicial separation.
“There is merit in the appeal,” said Kamardin who did not provide the grounds to overrule the ruling.
The identities of the parties involved were withheld as provided in the High Court ruling.



In July last year, AJS filed for separation against her husband, known as RIS, who was represented by Foo Yet Ngo and Kiran Dhaliwal.
AJS also included JBMH, a Muslim woman, as co-respondent, as she was said to be having an affair with RIS.
JBMH then filed an application to remove her name on the basis that the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA) did not apply to Muslims.
High Court judge Faizah Jamaluddin dismissed the application in November.

Today, Siew Choon Jern, who appeared for JBMH, told the court Section 3 (3) of the LRA was clear that it excluded Muslims.
“It is a blanket exclusion. The only exception is in relation to Muslim converts who had civil marriages,” Siew said.
Ravi Nekoo, who represented AJS, said the court had to look into the legislative intent of Section 3 (3).
“Parliament would not have given a cloak of immunity to a Muslim who wrecks the marriage of non-Muslim couples and allow them to get away with it,” he said.
Foo urged Kamardin to provide a written judgment as the High Court ruling had been overruled and that it was an important development in law.
Meanwhile, Ravi said he would consult with his client whether to file an appeal in the Federal Court.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Which brings us to this story.
Malay first muslim second current PM of malaysia.
Nika Gee Will Get Only RM20 Million And Not RM50 Million
CORRIDORS OF POWER
By MT Webmaster Last updated Aug 19, 2016

1.5kShares
facebook sharing button

twitter sharing button

whatsapp sharing button

messenger sharing button

email sharing button

print sharing button

sharethis sharing button


mt2014-corridors-of-power

Nika Gee wants Stanley to withdraw the divorce case and to retract the SD that he signed mentioning Muhyiddin’s name as her lover. If he can agree to do that then she will drop the counter-claim against him. Muhyiddin will give Nika Gee RM50 million if Stanley withdraws the divorce case and retracts the SD. But Stanley does not agree to retract the SD so that means Nike Gee will get only RM20 million and not RM50 million.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin

Nothing-to-Hide

This was what The Star reported on 21st June 2016:

The divorce proceeding between former deputy public prosecutor Stanley Clement Augustin and his wife Nika Gee Siew Yee has been postponed to August 16 for case management.
According to the court’s e-filing site, a notice of application by counsel to withdraw himself has been fixed for that date.
According to Augustin’s petition for divorce filed in December 2014, he and Gee – a businesswoman – were married on April 24, 2007.
He was a divorcee with three children and Gee, who was named as the respondent, was a divorcee with two children at the time.
The marriage was registered at the National Registration Department in Putrajaya, two days before Augustin retired from the Attorney-General’s Chambers as deputy public prosecutor.
In her reply, Gee said she met Augustin via a friend, Datuk Yusof Khan, around October 2002 when Augustin was in the process of divorcing his former wife.

She claimed that they had become close by the end of June 2003. In a Statutory Declaration made on December 7, 2015, Augustin claimed they had a pre-nuptial agreement and that Gee admitted to having an ongoing affair with a prominent politician.

This very high-profile divorce case that threatens to embroil Muhyiddin Yassin in the whole thing — mainly because he is mentioned in that 7th December 2015 Statutory Declaration — is going to be heard in court in four days time. And Muhyiddin is desperately trying to get that case buried before it can rear its ugly head.
Tun Musa Hitam has told Muhyiddin in no uncertain terms that he has to get this matter resolved at all cost or else his entire political career is finished. And that would also mean Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s new Pribumi party, which Muhyiddin is heading, is going to be dead in the water. It would be like getting bombed as you taxi on the runaway before you can take off.
Mahathir agrees with what Musa said and has told Muhyiddin to get this matter settled or else he might as well take a gun and put a bullet through his own head — because technically that is what Muhyiddin would be doing, committing suicide.
So Muhyiddin offered Nika Gee RM50 million to get this matter resolved — RM20 million if she can get Stanley to withdraw the case and another RM30 million if she can get him to retract the Statutory Declaration.
Nika Gee then went to meet Stanley’s lawyer, Kumar, and offered to drop her counter-claim against Stanley if he agrees to withdraw the case plus retract the Statutory Declaration.

The three things that Nika Gee originally wanted, for her to agree to the divorce, are: (1) the house (that Stanley’s recently deceased mother was staying in), (2) a huge monthly maintenance, and (3) legal costs. If Stanley can agree to withdraw the divorce case plus retract the Statutory Declaration then she will also agree to waive those three claims.
Muhyiddin cannot afford for the case to be heard on Tuesday or else the Statutory Declaration would be discussed and hence his name would be mentioned. But then dropping the case alone is not enough since the Statutory Declaration is already public knowledge. They need Stanley to also retract the Statutory Declaration.
Stanley’s lawyer came back and told Nika Gee they are prepared to withdraw the case but not to retract the Statutory Declaration. Nika Gee then said if Stanley is not prepared to retract the Statutory Declaration could he at least declare that the Statutory Declaration is a fake or a fabrication?
But Stanley cannot do that as well because he did sign the Statutory Declaration and there are witnesses to that. And if he changed his story then he runs the risk of getting charged and may even have to spend a maximum of ten years in jail.
So withdraw the case yes, retract the Statutory Declaration no.
So now Nika Gee is stuck. If Stanley just withdraws the case she will only get RM20 million. She needs Stanley to also retract the Statutory Declaration, or at least declare it a fake, before she can get RM50 million. And Muhyiddin needs that Statutory Declaration killed even more than the divorce proceedings killed because his name is mentioned in that document.
What is even more interesting is that Musa is also involved in this and knows what is going on. And it was Musa who advised Muhyiddin to settle this matter at all cost, never mind how much it is going to cost. No wonder Musa gave the impression in his recent interview that Mahathir is clean and is not to blame for Umno’s problems — which we talked about in the previous article
 
Top