The next time I am not just taking HK back from you, I will take London down easily, you don't Kuai Lan! Dead fucking bankrupted beggar KNN!
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-09-09/doc-ihivtsyk3508277.shtml
60多年前没落的英国如何搅局台湾问题：利益至上
60多年前没落的英国如何搅局台湾问题：利益至上
0
原标题：首鼠两端朝秦暮楚，60年多年前没落的英国是如何搅局台湾问题的
作者：
entelecheia
近代以来，英国因为其特殊的地缘条件，在整个泛欧洲范围内的外交问题上往往散发着一种别样的政治光谱，近三百年以来的欧陆平衡主义在英帝国的朝堂之中或明或暗，或沉或浮，但基本上可以作为一条主线，去理解英德、英法以及其在近东和北非问题上和其他列强在殖民势力的分割中是如何折冲樽俎的。放眼观之，百年以来英国在远东利益链条的存续上往往也是欧陆平衡主义的一种延伸。
尤其是在一战之后日不落帝国日趋没落，不列颠酋运衰颓，帝国的权力触角畏葸而蹙缩，很多时候不得不合纵连横，和美日俄周旋，靠着死而不僵的柔软身段尽可能攫取利益最大化。在思想领域，英国是实用主义（pragmatism）和怀疑主义（skeptics）的总教师（这方面英国人确实有资格让美国人叫爹），以此可以深层次理解为何英国很多时候在远东尤其在涉华的原则性问题上朝秦暮楚出尔反尔。
观察者网昨天的一则新闻，英国在南海问题上搞鬼，擅闯我西沙群岛领海遭驱逐，引来读者们的阵阵嘲讽，这件事或许能给我们提供解读英国远东外交政策的一个侧面参照。
英国这些年经常被塑造为欧洲三大国英德法中最“親华”的一个，相比德国在意识形态领域的高傲和中法经济关系的不冷不热，英国往往以一副热心面孔面对一带一路倡议，理性看待中国的崛起势头。
英国对华温婉可亲的一面，确实并非没有历史依据。
一 西方大国中，英国是一批西方大国中最早承认中华人民共和国的一个；
二 中英在解决香港问题上虽有分歧，但总体保持了相当高的互信性，大局上没有失掉绅士风度，香港和平主权交接，回归祖国；
三 脱欧背景下的英国客观上逼迫不列颠相比德法更加靠拢中国，文化上对华包容度也更高，从汉语的传播力度便可见一斑。
但学随术变的国际政治外交研究模式往往会遮蔽掉一些杂音和负面的历史记忆。很多时候，英国人温情脉脉的面纱下伸出的却是一双冰冷的手，这次，英国跳出来有意把南海问题复杂化，绝非偶然的临时起意。
而且很多人忘记了，60年前英国是怎样在台湾问题上上下其手，朝三暮四，以“化身博士”的姿态随着美苏的“冷战合唱团”起舞，只需问一个问题便可明白：英国很早承认了中华人民共和国，但当时为何没有建立大使级外交关系，而是代办级外交关系？为何迟迟等到1972年英国才和中国建立起了大使级外交关系？
和瑞典芬兰这种承认新中国马上就建立大使级外交关系的国家，英国确实相形见绌了。
英国要对从1950年代到1970年代中英关系的曲折缓慢的发展负主要责任，一大原因就是台湾问题。
二战结束后，按照开罗会议的精神和波茨坦公告的原则，台湾正式结束殖民时代，回到了祖国的怀抱，1945年10月，国民党军队赴台接受日军投降，台湾省政府也正式建立了。英国人一看也随大流，在台北建立了领事馆，以观后效。
二战甫一结束，大国间的摩擦马上从盟国联合抗击纳粹变成了西方国家联合抗击“赤祸”，发表铁幕演说的丘吉尔无疑就是反共的急先锋，以他为代表的保守主义派长期占据王国议会的C位，为接下来的中英关系埋下了不祥的种子。
1947年台湾爆发了二二八事件，英国人一看机会来了。英国驻台湾领事克尔立即向英美政府悍然提出了这样一项建议，由联合国托管台湾，实质上就是要松动开罗宣言各方达成的协议。受限于当时并不明朗的大陆局势，这项提议暂时被搁置了。
熟悉英国外交套路的政论家，其实对英国人做出这样一项提议不应该太感到大惊小怪，因为这是他们的日常操作。
在以色列和巴勒斯坦互掐问题上拉偏架搅乱中东局势，托管科威特分离黎巴嫩削弱阿拉伯复兴党，再往远了说，为了阻止沙俄和法国势力扩张硬是搞出比利时和爱沙尼亚，在北欧还挑唆了挪威从瑞典独立，南亚印巴孟三国分治，英国人玩分离确实不得不说是666，而且挑唆完了他第一个站出来当和事佬：“别打别打，要和谐。”这就是典型的傻面贼心。
大陆和台湾的统独议题上，貌似美国是主导者，背后从未缺少英国这条恶犬在背后作祟。英国驻华大使在1944年给丘吉尔的信中这样说：“英国的原则是当中国只是名义上统一时，我们应与各地方当局 打交道……应通过其在中国各地的领事与地方割据政府保持事实上的联系。 ”换言之，鸡蛋不能放在一个篮子里。
理解了这些小心思下的对话外交政策，我们才能深刻了解英国在50年代初的如下举动：
口头上承认台湾属于中国，但在美国第七舰队悍然入侵台湾海峡时，英国政府毫不犹豫地站出来表示支持。
美国第七舰队进入台湾海峡
英国政务次官Bachllet在议会中公开叫嚣台湾根本不属于中国，因为台湾是从日本手里接收回来的，但日本占领台湾是有法理依据的（马关条约），跟中国接收东北性质完全不一样，法理上讲，台湾还是属于日本的。
这样一番谬论当场遭到工党领袖Gallnecher的严厉驳斥：如果台湾不属于中国，那么跑到台湾的蒋介石政权到底算怎么一回事？不就变成了没有祖国的一群野狗了吗？那为什么美国还要帮着蒋介石窃取中华人民共和国在联合国的合法席位呢？如果说台湾不属于中国，那么大陆的毛泽东政权完全有理由把军队开过海峡，消灭反动的美国反动派和他们的走狗蒋介石。
Gallnecher的这番言论立刻登上了英国卫报和泰晤士报的头条，引发了英国民众广泛的积极正面的呼声。英国首相艾德礼迫于压力，在1950年8月15日这天发表讲话，反对美国分裂台湾的图谋，认为美国如果“武装保卫台湾”是危险的。
但是艾德礼还有一句兜底的话，认为在朝鲜战争结束之前，台湾问题属于“未决”问题。这就给后来极其反动的旧金山会议的决议埋下了伏笔。
前英国首相克莱门特·艾德礼
1951年的旧金山和约是盟国正式的对日和约，理应有中国参加。但美国横加阻挠把中国排斥在外，通过了“台湾问题法理未定”的法案，只是认为台湾主权不再属于日本，是否要归还中国，那就两说了。
至今为止，岛内的台独分子在骚动的时候，还是喜欢拿《旧金山和约》说事，这个会议却是余毒甚广，但英国慑于美国的淫威，为了维持英美盟友关系，并未在旧金山和约问题上提反对意见。
中英关系真正走向恶化是1952年丘吉尔再次上台之后。
我们来看看丘吉尔内阁取代艾德礼内阁后，丘吉尔的一系列言论：
一 “我们决不允许共产主义分子屠杀台湾人民”；
二 “蒋介石是我在远东最仰慕的人”；
三 “谁反对共产主义，谁就是我的朋友”。
丘吉尔确实说话很直白，在“大是大非”问题上，他并不需要拿出获得诺贝尔文学奖的白头搔更短的推敲劲头，一切都很赤裸裸。
1952年下半年，英国给台湾派了一个海军顾问，且并未取消台北的领事馆，首鼠两端昭然若揭。11月份，这个领事馆还试探性地询问“能否和台湾建立正式的外交关系”，但并无下文。
1952年10月份，两位反共急先锋杜鲁门和丘吉尔碰头
英国人的心思是这样的，共产党在大陆的政权已经稳固了，蒋介石虽然手上有军队，但反攻大陆计划过于孟浪，不太可能实现，而共产党渡海作战解放台湾又有美军横亘，双方就这样尬住了，不如索性成立一个台湾临时政府，把这个临时政府变成台湾共和国，对英国来说也是美滋滋。
1953年1月，英国外交部法律顾问比格斯接受BBC采访时公开表示，中国人要好好读一读国际法，开罗宣言只是宣言，不是法，什么叫法？旧金山和约才是法，说白了还是认为台湾主权未定，可以法理独立。
1954年4月，英国驻联合国代表Dickson正式把“台湾不应归还给中国”的提议提交大会讨论。在英国当局看来，台海分治和巴以分治很类似，英国可以一鱼两吃，借助蒋介石牵制大陆维护英国在东南亚的利益。
结语
为了台湾的“法理台独”，丘吉尔内阁曾经一度幻想拿中华人民共和国在联合国的合法席位相诱惑，意思是以中华人民共和国入联换取台湾独立。他们显然低估了以毛泽东同志为核心的党中央第一代领导集体的雄心壮志（毛泽东曾深思熟虑，如何把朝鲜战争和新中国入常问题同时解决，有关这一点可参见沈志华的专著《毛泽东、斯大林与朝鲜战争》），而且毛泽东主席和周恩来总理对英国在海峡两岸图谋做局洞若观火。
1952年5月10日，毛泽东在同尼赫鲁夫人的谈话中借钟馗打鬼，指出英国在台湾问题上左右摇摆，已经严重影响了中英正常外交关系的有序展开。
黄镇（穿中山装者）
1958年2月27日，中国驻英临时代办黄镇向英国政府抗议他们同国民党政权的亲密接触。
从1950年开始到1970年，中英两国的外交关系始终处于一个比较尴尬且微妙的状态，英国在华使团也始终没有出现在在华外交使团的名单上。
60年前的台湾问题，今天的南海问题，无不体现英国的巴麦尊法则：机会主义与利益至上，所有的投机、阴谋、背叛都可以被披上国际法的合法外衣，重构一种“帮助重建区域国际秩序”的正面形象。不过，如今的英国……用观网网友的话说，二十年前见到这新闻是屈辱，十年前见到这新闻是愤怒，现在见到这新闻，呵呵。
（版权所有，转载请联系作者）
How did the UK, which fell more than 60 years ago, stir up the Taiwan issue: the interests are paramount
September 09, 2018 09:16 Observer Network
0
Original title: The two sides of the first mouse are facing the Qin and Chu, how did the UK, which fell more than 60 years ago, disrupt the Taiwan issue?
Author:
Entelechea
In modern times, because of its special geographical conditions, the United Kingdom often exudes a different political spectrum in the entire pan-European diplomatic issue. In the past three hundred years, the continental balanceism has been in the imperial court of the British Empire. Ming or dark, or sinking or floating, but basically can be used as a main line to understand how Britain, Germany, Britain and France and its problems in the Near East and North Africa and other powers in the division of colonial power are smashed. Looking at it, Britain has often been an extension of Euro-balancedism in the survival of the Far East interest chain for centuries.
Especially after the First World War, the empire did not fall, the British emirates were in decline, the power of the empire was timid and huddled. In many cases, it had to be contiguous, and the United States, Japan and Russia were circling, relying on the soft body of death and not stiff. Maximize the benefits as much as possible. In the field of thought, Britain is the general teacher of pragmatism and skeptics (the British are indeed qualified to scream Americans), so that they can understand deeply why the UK is especially involved in the Far East. On the principle of China's principle, the Qin dynasty was turned back.
Observer's yesterday's news, the United Kingdom on the South China Sea issue, arrogantly expelled my Xisha Islands territorial waters, attracted readers' ridicule, this incident may provide us with a side view of the British Far East foreign policy Reference.
The United Kingdom has often been shaped as one of the most "pro-China" in the three major European countries in Britain and Germany. Compared with Germany's arrogance in the ideological field and the lukewarm relationship between China and France, Britain often has an enthusiastic face. Regarding the Belt and Road Initiative, we should rationally look at the rising momentum of China.
Britain’s amiable side to China is indeed without historical basis.
Among the Western powers, Britain is one of the first Western powers to recognize the People’s Republic of China;
Although the two China and Britain have differences on the settlement of the Hong Kong issue, they have maintained a high degree of mutual trust. The overall situation has not lost the gentleman's demeanor. Hong Kong's peaceful sovereignty has been transferred to the motherland.
Under the background of the European Union, the British objectively forced Britain to move closer to China than Germany and France, and cultural tolerance to China was higher. This can be seen from the spread of Chinese.
However, the international political diplomacy research mode that learns with the changes often obscures some noise and negative historical memory. Many times, under the veil of the warmth of the British, there is a pair of cold hands. This time, the British jumped out to intentionally complicate the South China Sea issue, which is not an accidental temporary intention.
And many people have forgotten how the United Kingdom took its hands on the Taiwan issue 60 years ago, and marched with the "Cold War chorus" of the United States and the Soviet Union as a "doctor of the avatar". You only need to ask a question to understand: Britain is very He recognized the People’s Republic of China early, but why did he not establish diplomatic relations at the ambassadorial level, but at the level of diplomatic relations? Why did it wait until 1972 when Britain established diplomatic relations with China at the ambassadorial level?
The United Kingdom is indeed dwarfed by Sweden and Finland, a country that recognizes that New China will soon establish diplomatic relations at the ambassadorial level.
The United Kingdom has the primary responsibility for the slow and tortuous development of Sino-British relations from the 1950s to the 1970s. One major reason is the Taiwan issue.
After the end of the Second World War, in accordance with the spirit of the Cairo Conference and the principles of the Potsdam Proclamation, Taiwan officially ended the colonial era and returned to the embrace of the motherland. In October 1945, the Kuomintang troops went to Taiwan to accept the Japanese surrender, and the Taiwan provincial government was formally established. The British also followed the crowd and established a consulate in Taipei to see the aftereffects.
At the end of the Second World War, the friction between the big powers immediately changed from the Allied coalition against the Nazis to the Western countries' joint fight against the "red disaster." Churchill, who published the iron curtain speech, is undoubtedly the anti-Communist vanguard, and the conservatives represented by him have long occupied. The C position of the Kingdom Council has laid an ominous seed for the next Sino-British relationship.
In 1947, the February 28 incident broke out in Taiwan, and the British saw the opportunity. The British consul in Taiwan, Kerr, immediately proposed to the British and American governments such a proposal. The United Nations hosting Taiwan is essentially to loosen the agreement reached by the parties to the Cairo Declaration. Limited to the situation on the mainland, which was not clear at the time, this proposal was temporarily put on hold.
Political commentators who are familiar with British diplomatic routines should not be too surprised to make such a proposal for the British, because this is their daily operation.
On the issue of mutual ties between Israel and Palestine, the situation in the Middle East was disrupted, and the escrow of Kuwait to separate Lebanon weakened the Arab Baath Party. Further, it was said that in order to prevent the expansion of Russia and France, it was the case that Belgium and Estonia were created, and Norway was also provoked in Northern Europe. From Sweden's independence, South Asia, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, the British separation of the game really has to be said to be 666, and the provocation has ended his first stand out as a matter of fact: "Don't fight, don't fight, be harmonious." This is typical Silly face thief.
On the issue of the reunification of the mainland and Taiwan, it seems that the United States is the dominant player. There is never a shortage of the British dog behind it. The British ambassador to China said in a letter to Churchill in 1944: "The principle of the United Kingdom is that when China is only nominally unified, we should deal with local authorities... and should be maintained by the government through its consular and local authorities throughout China. In fact, the link. "In other words, eggs can not be placed in a basket.
Understand these carefully thought-out dialogue foreign policy, we can deeply understand the following actions of the United Kingdom in the early 1950s:
I verbally admit that Taiwan belongs to China, but when the US Seventh Fleet suddenly invaded the Taiwan Strait, the British government did not hesitate to stand up and express its support.
The US Seventh Fleet enters the Taiwan Strait
British political affairs official Bachllet publicly screamed in the parliament that Taiwan does not belong to China at all, because Taiwan was received from Japan, but Japan’s occupation of Taiwan is based on legal basis (the Treaty of Shimonoseki), which is totally different from China’s reception of the Northeast. Jurisprudentially speaking, Taiwan still belongs to Japan.
Such a paradox was severely refuted by Labour Party leader Gallencher on the spot: If Taiwan does not belong to China, then what is the Chiang Kai-shek regime that ran to Taiwan? Didn't it become a group of wild dogs without the motherland? Then why should the United States help Chiang Kai-shek steal the legitimate seat of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations? If Taiwan does not belong to China, then the mainland Mao Zedong regime has every reason to open the army across the strait and eliminate the reactionary American reactionaries and their running dog Chiang Kai-shek.
Gallnecher’s remarks immediately made headlines in the British Guardian and The Times, sparking a broad and positive voice from the British public. Under the pressure of British Prime Minister Adelaide, he delivered a speech on August 15, 1950, opposing the US attempt to split Taiwan. He believed that it is dangerous for the United States to "armed and defend Taiwan."
But Attlee also has a saying that the Taiwan issue is a "pending" issue before the end of the Korean War. This laid the groundwork for the resolution of the later reactionary San Francisco meeting.
Former British Prime Minister Clement Attlee
The San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951 was an official peace treaty with the Allies, and it was supposed that China participated. However, the United States has obstructed the exclusion of China and passed the "Taiwan issue is undecided" bill. It only believes that Taiwan’s sovereignty no longer belongs to Japan, and whether it will be returned to China, then the two said.
So far, the Taiwan independence elements on the island still like to take the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" when they are in the turmoil. This meeting is very poisonous, but the United Kingdom is arrogant in the United States. In order to maintain the Anglo-American alliance, it is not in San Francisco. Raise objections to the issue.
The real deterioration of Sino-British relations was after Churchill came to power again in 1952.
Let’s take a look at Churchill’s series of remarks after Churchill’s cabinet replaced Attlee’s cabinet:
"We will never allow communists to slaughter the people of Taiwan";
2. "Jiang Jieshi is the person I admire most in the Far East";
Three "Who is against communism, who is my friend."
Churchill did speak very straightforwardly. On the issue of "big and big," he didn't need to take the short-term spur of the Nobel Prize for Literature. Everything was naked.
In the second half of 1952, the United Kingdom sent a naval consultant to Taiwan, and did not cancel the consulate in Taipei. In November, the consulate also tentatively asked whether "can establish formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan," but there is no following.
In October 1952, two anti-communist pioneers Truman and Churchill met.
The British people's mind is like this. The Communist Party's political power on the mainland has been stabilized. Although Chiang Kai-shek has an army on hand, the counter-attack of the mainland plan is too much for Menglang, and it is unlikely to be realized. The Communist Party crosses the sea to liberate Taiwan and there are American troops. If you are stunned, it is better to set up a temporary Taiwanese government and turn this interim government into the Republic of Taiwan. It is also a good thing for the United Kingdom.
In January 1953, the British Foreign Ministry legal adviser Biggs publicly stated in an interview with the BBC that the Chinese should read the international law well. The Cairo Declaration is only a declaration, not a law. What is the name? The San Francisco Peace Treaty is the law. To put it bluntly, it is still believed that Taiwan’s sovereignty is undecided and can be legally independent.
In April 1954, the British representative to the United Nations Dickson officially submitted the proposal that "Taiwan should not be returned to China" to the conference for discussion. In the opinion of the British authorities, the division of the Taiwan Strait and the separation of the Palestinians and Israelis are very similar. The United Kingdom can eat both fish and fish, and use Chiang Kai-shek to contain the mainland to safeguard Britain's interests in Southeast Asia.
Conclusion
For Taiwan’s "legal Taiwan independence," Churchill’s cabinet once illusory that the People’s Republic of China was tempted by the legitimate seat of the United Nations, meaning that the People’s Republic of China was elected to exchange for Taiwan’s independence. They obviously underestimated the ambition of the first generation of the Party Central Committee with Comrade Mao Zedong as the core (Mao Zedong once thought deeply about how to solve the Korean War and the new China into the same problem at the same time. For details, see Shen Zhihua's monograph "Mao Zedong, Stalin With the Korean War, and Chairman Mao Zedong and Premier Zhou Enlai made a slap in the face of the British cross-strait plot.
On May 10, 1952, Mao Zedong used the bell to beat the ghosts in his conversation with Mrs. Nehru, pointing out that Britain’s swing on the Taiwan issue has seriously affected the orderly development of China-UK normal diplomatic relations.
Huang Zhen (wearing tunic suit)
On February 27, 1958, the Chinese Chargé d’affaires in the United Kingdom, Huang Zhen, protested to the British government their close contact with the Kuomintang regime.
From 1950 to 1970, the diplomatic relations between China and Britain have always been in a relatively embarrassing and subtle state. The British missions in China have never appeared on the list of diplomatic missions in China.
The Taiwan issue 60 years ago, today's South China Sea issue, all reflect the British Bama's law: opportunism and interests supreme, all speculation, conspiracy, betrayal can be put on the legal cloak of international law, refactoring a kind of "help A positive image of the reconstruction of the regional international order. However, today's Britain... In the words of the netizens, it is humiliating to see this news 20 years ago. It was anger to see this news ten years ago. Now I see this news, hehe.
(Copyright, please contact the author if you want to reprint)
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-09-09/doc-ihivtsyk3508277.shtml
60多年前没落的英国如何搅局台湾问题：利益至上
60多年前没落的英国如何搅局台湾问题：利益至上
0
原标题：首鼠两端朝秦暮楚，60年多年前没落的英国是如何搅局台湾问题的
作者：
entelecheia
近代以来，英国因为其特殊的地缘条件，在整个泛欧洲范围内的外交问题上往往散发着一种别样的政治光谱，近三百年以来的欧陆平衡主义在英帝国的朝堂之中或明或暗，或沉或浮，但基本上可以作为一条主线，去理解英德、英法以及其在近东和北非问题上和其他列强在殖民势力的分割中是如何折冲樽俎的。放眼观之，百年以来英国在远东利益链条的存续上往往也是欧陆平衡主义的一种延伸。
尤其是在一战之后日不落帝国日趋没落，不列颠酋运衰颓，帝国的权力触角畏葸而蹙缩，很多时候不得不合纵连横，和美日俄周旋，靠着死而不僵的柔软身段尽可能攫取利益最大化。在思想领域，英国是实用主义（pragmatism）和怀疑主义（skeptics）的总教师（这方面英国人确实有资格让美国人叫爹），以此可以深层次理解为何英国很多时候在远东尤其在涉华的原则性问题上朝秦暮楚出尔反尔。
观察者网昨天的一则新闻，英国在南海问题上搞鬼，擅闯我西沙群岛领海遭驱逐，引来读者们的阵阵嘲讽，这件事或许能给我们提供解读英国远东外交政策的一个侧面参照。
英国这些年经常被塑造为欧洲三大国英德法中最“親华”的一个，相比德国在意识形态领域的高傲和中法经济关系的不冷不热，英国往往以一副热心面孔面对一带一路倡议，理性看待中国的崛起势头。
英国对华温婉可亲的一面，确实并非没有历史依据。
一 西方大国中，英国是一批西方大国中最早承认中华人民共和国的一个；
二 中英在解决香港问题上虽有分歧，但总体保持了相当高的互信性，大局上没有失掉绅士风度，香港和平主权交接，回归祖国；
三 脱欧背景下的英国客观上逼迫不列颠相比德法更加靠拢中国，文化上对华包容度也更高，从汉语的传播力度便可见一斑。
但学随术变的国际政治外交研究模式往往会遮蔽掉一些杂音和负面的历史记忆。很多时候，英国人温情脉脉的面纱下伸出的却是一双冰冷的手，这次，英国跳出来有意把南海问题复杂化，绝非偶然的临时起意。
而且很多人忘记了，60年前英国是怎样在台湾问题上上下其手，朝三暮四，以“化身博士”的姿态随着美苏的“冷战合唱团”起舞，只需问一个问题便可明白：英国很早承认了中华人民共和国，但当时为何没有建立大使级外交关系，而是代办级外交关系？为何迟迟等到1972年英国才和中国建立起了大使级外交关系？
和瑞典芬兰这种承认新中国马上就建立大使级外交关系的国家，英国确实相形见绌了。
英国要对从1950年代到1970年代中英关系的曲折缓慢的发展负主要责任，一大原因就是台湾问题。
二战结束后，按照开罗会议的精神和波茨坦公告的原则，台湾正式结束殖民时代，回到了祖国的怀抱，1945年10月，国民党军队赴台接受日军投降，台湾省政府也正式建立了。英国人一看也随大流，在台北建立了领事馆，以观后效。
二战甫一结束，大国间的摩擦马上从盟国联合抗击纳粹变成了西方国家联合抗击“赤祸”，发表铁幕演说的丘吉尔无疑就是反共的急先锋，以他为代表的保守主义派长期占据王国议会的C位，为接下来的中英关系埋下了不祥的种子。
1947年台湾爆发了二二八事件，英国人一看机会来了。英国驻台湾领事克尔立即向英美政府悍然提出了这样一项建议，由联合国托管台湾，实质上就是要松动开罗宣言各方达成的协议。受限于当时并不明朗的大陆局势，这项提议暂时被搁置了。
熟悉英国外交套路的政论家，其实对英国人做出这样一项提议不应该太感到大惊小怪，因为这是他们的日常操作。
在以色列和巴勒斯坦互掐问题上拉偏架搅乱中东局势，托管科威特分离黎巴嫩削弱阿拉伯复兴党，再往远了说，为了阻止沙俄和法国势力扩张硬是搞出比利时和爱沙尼亚，在北欧还挑唆了挪威从瑞典独立，南亚印巴孟三国分治，英国人玩分离确实不得不说是666，而且挑唆完了他第一个站出来当和事佬：“别打别打，要和谐。”这就是典型的傻面贼心。
大陆和台湾的统独议题上，貌似美国是主导者，背后从未缺少英国这条恶犬在背后作祟。英国驻华大使在1944年给丘吉尔的信中这样说：“英国的原则是当中国只是名义上统一时，我们应与各地方当局 打交道……应通过其在中国各地的领事与地方割据政府保持事实上的联系。 ”换言之，鸡蛋不能放在一个篮子里。
理解了这些小心思下的对话外交政策，我们才能深刻了解英国在50年代初的如下举动：
口头上承认台湾属于中国，但在美国第七舰队悍然入侵台湾海峡时，英国政府毫不犹豫地站出来表示支持。
英国政务次官Bachllet在议会中公开叫嚣台湾根本不属于中国，因为台湾是从日本手里接收回来的，但日本占领台湾是有法理依据的（马关条约），跟中国接收东北性质完全不一样，法理上讲，台湾还是属于日本的。
这样一番谬论当场遭到工党领袖Gallnecher的严厉驳斥：如果台湾不属于中国，那么跑到台湾的蒋介石政权到底算怎么一回事？不就变成了没有祖国的一群野狗了吗？那为什么美国还要帮着蒋介石窃取中华人民共和国在联合国的合法席位呢？如果说台湾不属于中国，那么大陆的毛泽东政权完全有理由把军队开过海峡，消灭反动的美国反动派和他们的走狗蒋介石。
Gallnecher的这番言论立刻登上了英国卫报和泰晤士报的头条，引发了英国民众广泛的积极正面的呼声。英国首相艾德礼迫于压力，在1950年8月15日这天发表讲话，反对美国分裂台湾的图谋，认为美国如果“武装保卫台湾”是危险的。
但是艾德礼还有一句兜底的话，认为在朝鲜战争结束之前，台湾问题属于“未决”问题。这就给后来极其反动的旧金山会议的决议埋下了伏笔。
1951年的旧金山和约是盟国正式的对日和约，理应有中国参加。但美国横加阻挠把中国排斥在外，通过了“台湾问题法理未定”的法案，只是认为台湾主权不再属于日本，是否要归还中国，那就两说了。
至今为止，岛内的台独分子在骚动的时候，还是喜欢拿《旧金山和约》说事，这个会议却是余毒甚广，但英国慑于美国的淫威，为了维持英美盟友关系，并未在旧金山和约问题上提反对意见。
中英关系真正走向恶化是1952年丘吉尔再次上台之后。
我们来看看丘吉尔内阁取代艾德礼内阁后，丘吉尔的一系列言论：
一 “我们决不允许共产主义分子屠杀台湾人民”；
二 “蒋介石是我在远东最仰慕的人”；
三 “谁反对共产主义，谁就是我的朋友”。
丘吉尔确实说话很直白，在“大是大非”问题上，他并不需要拿出获得诺贝尔文学奖的白头搔更短的推敲劲头，一切都很赤裸裸。
1952年下半年，英国给台湾派了一个海军顾问，且并未取消台北的领事馆，首鼠两端昭然若揭。11月份，这个领事馆还试探性地询问“能否和台湾建立正式的外交关系”，但并无下文。
英国人的心思是这样的，共产党在大陆的政权已经稳固了，蒋介石虽然手上有军队，但反攻大陆计划过于孟浪，不太可能实现，而共产党渡海作战解放台湾又有美军横亘，双方就这样尬住了，不如索性成立一个台湾临时政府，把这个临时政府变成台湾共和国，对英国来说也是美滋滋。
1953年1月，英国外交部法律顾问比格斯接受BBC采访时公开表示，中国人要好好读一读国际法，开罗宣言只是宣言，不是法，什么叫法？旧金山和约才是法，说白了还是认为台湾主权未定，可以法理独立。
1954年4月，英国驻联合国代表Dickson正式把“台湾不应归还给中国”的提议提交大会讨论。在英国当局看来，台海分治和巴以分治很类似，英国可以一鱼两吃，借助蒋介石牵制大陆维护英国在东南亚的利益。
结语
为了台湾的“法理台独”，丘吉尔内阁曾经一度幻想拿中华人民共和国在联合国的合法席位相诱惑，意思是以中华人民共和国入联换取台湾独立。他们显然低估了以毛泽东同志为核心的党中央第一代领导集体的雄心壮志（毛泽东曾深思熟虑，如何把朝鲜战争和新中国入常问题同时解决，有关这一点可参见沈志华的专著《毛泽东、斯大林与朝鲜战争》），而且毛泽东主席和周恩来总理对英国在海峡两岸图谋做局洞若观火。
1952年5月10日，毛泽东在同尼赫鲁夫人的谈话中借钟馗打鬼，指出英国在台湾问题上左右摇摆，已经严重影响了中英正常外交关系的有序展开。
1958年2月27日，中国驻英临时代办黄镇向英国政府抗议他们同国民党政权的亲密接触。
从1950年开始到1970年，中英两国的外交关系始终处于一个比较尴尬且微妙的状态，英国在华使团也始终没有出现在在华外交使团的名单上。
60年前的台湾问题，今天的南海问题，无不体现英国的巴麦尊法则：机会主义与利益至上，所有的投机、阴谋、背叛都可以被披上国际法的合法外衣，重构一种“帮助重建区域国际秩序”的正面形象。不过，如今的英国……用观网网友的话说，二十年前见到这新闻是屈辱，十年前见到这新闻是愤怒，现在见到这新闻，呵呵。
（版权所有，转载请联系作者）
How did the UK, which fell more than 60 years ago, stir up the Taiwan issue: the interests are paramount
September 09, 2018 09:16 Observer Network
0
Original title: The two sides of the first mouse are facing the Qin and Chu, how did the UK, which fell more than 60 years ago, disrupt the Taiwan issue?
Author:
Entelechea
In modern times, because of its special geographical conditions, the United Kingdom often exudes a different political spectrum in the entire pan-European diplomatic issue. In the past three hundred years, the continental balanceism has been in the imperial court of the British Empire. Ming or dark, or sinking or floating, but basically can be used as a main line to understand how Britain, Germany, Britain and France and its problems in the Near East and North Africa and other powers in the division of colonial power are smashed. Looking at it, Britain has often been an extension of Euro-balancedism in the survival of the Far East interest chain for centuries.
Especially after the First World War, the empire did not fall, the British emirates were in decline, the power of the empire was timid and huddled. In many cases, it had to be contiguous, and the United States, Japan and Russia were circling, relying on the soft body of death and not stiff. Maximize the benefits as much as possible. In the field of thought, Britain is the general teacher of pragmatism and skeptics (the British are indeed qualified to scream Americans), so that they can understand deeply why the UK is especially involved in the Far East. On the principle of China's principle, the Qin dynasty was turned back.
Observer's yesterday's news, the United Kingdom on the South China Sea issue, arrogantly expelled my Xisha Islands territorial waters, attracted readers' ridicule, this incident may provide us with a side view of the British Far East foreign policy Reference.
The United Kingdom has often been shaped as one of the most "pro-China" in the three major European countries in Britain and Germany. Compared with Germany's arrogance in the ideological field and the lukewarm relationship between China and France, Britain often has an enthusiastic face. Regarding the Belt and Road Initiative, we should rationally look at the rising momentum of China.
Britain’s amiable side to China is indeed without historical basis.
Among the Western powers, Britain is one of the first Western powers to recognize the People’s Republic of China;
Although the two China and Britain have differences on the settlement of the Hong Kong issue, they have maintained a high degree of mutual trust. The overall situation has not lost the gentleman's demeanor. Hong Kong's peaceful sovereignty has been transferred to the motherland.
Under the background of the European Union, the British objectively forced Britain to move closer to China than Germany and France, and cultural tolerance to China was higher. This can be seen from the spread of Chinese.
However, the international political diplomacy research mode that learns with the changes often obscures some noise and negative historical memory. Many times, under the veil of the warmth of the British, there is a pair of cold hands. This time, the British jumped out to intentionally complicate the South China Sea issue, which is not an accidental temporary intention.
And many people have forgotten how the United Kingdom took its hands on the Taiwan issue 60 years ago, and marched with the "Cold War chorus" of the United States and the Soviet Union as a "doctor of the avatar". You only need to ask a question to understand: Britain is very He recognized the People’s Republic of China early, but why did he not establish diplomatic relations at the ambassadorial level, but at the level of diplomatic relations? Why did it wait until 1972 when Britain established diplomatic relations with China at the ambassadorial level?
The United Kingdom is indeed dwarfed by Sweden and Finland, a country that recognizes that New China will soon establish diplomatic relations at the ambassadorial level.
The United Kingdom has the primary responsibility for the slow and tortuous development of Sino-British relations from the 1950s to the 1970s. One major reason is the Taiwan issue.
After the end of the Second World War, in accordance with the spirit of the Cairo Conference and the principles of the Potsdam Proclamation, Taiwan officially ended the colonial era and returned to the embrace of the motherland. In October 1945, the Kuomintang troops went to Taiwan to accept the Japanese surrender, and the Taiwan provincial government was formally established. The British also followed the crowd and established a consulate in Taipei to see the aftereffects.
At the end of the Second World War, the friction between the big powers immediately changed from the Allied coalition against the Nazis to the Western countries' joint fight against the "red disaster." Churchill, who published the iron curtain speech, is undoubtedly the anti-Communist vanguard, and the conservatives represented by him have long occupied. The C position of the Kingdom Council has laid an ominous seed for the next Sino-British relationship.
In 1947, the February 28 incident broke out in Taiwan, and the British saw the opportunity. The British consul in Taiwan, Kerr, immediately proposed to the British and American governments such a proposal. The United Nations hosting Taiwan is essentially to loosen the agreement reached by the parties to the Cairo Declaration. Limited to the situation on the mainland, which was not clear at the time, this proposal was temporarily put on hold.
Political commentators who are familiar with British diplomatic routines should not be too surprised to make such a proposal for the British, because this is their daily operation.
On the issue of mutual ties between Israel and Palestine, the situation in the Middle East was disrupted, and the escrow of Kuwait to separate Lebanon weakened the Arab Baath Party. Further, it was said that in order to prevent the expansion of Russia and France, it was the case that Belgium and Estonia were created, and Norway was also provoked in Northern Europe. From Sweden's independence, South Asia, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, the British separation of the game really has to be said to be 666, and the provocation has ended his first stand out as a matter of fact: "Don't fight, don't fight, be harmonious." This is typical Silly face thief.
On the issue of the reunification of the mainland and Taiwan, it seems that the United States is the dominant player. There is never a shortage of the British dog behind it. The British ambassador to China said in a letter to Churchill in 1944: "The principle of the United Kingdom is that when China is only nominally unified, we should deal with local authorities... and should be maintained by the government through its consular and local authorities throughout China. In fact, the link. "In other words, eggs can not be placed in a basket.
Understand these carefully thought-out dialogue foreign policy, we can deeply understand the following actions of the United Kingdom in the early 1950s:
I verbally admit that Taiwan belongs to China, but when the US Seventh Fleet suddenly invaded the Taiwan Strait, the British government did not hesitate to stand up and express its support.
British political affairs official Bachllet publicly screamed in the parliament that Taiwan does not belong to China at all, because Taiwan was received from Japan, but Japan’s occupation of Taiwan is based on legal basis (the Treaty of Shimonoseki), which is totally different from China’s reception of the Northeast. Jurisprudentially speaking, Taiwan still belongs to Japan.
Such a paradox was severely refuted by Labour Party leader Gallencher on the spot: If Taiwan does not belong to China, then what is the Chiang Kai-shek regime that ran to Taiwan? Didn't it become a group of wild dogs without the motherland? Then why should the United States help Chiang Kai-shek steal the legitimate seat of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations? If Taiwan does not belong to China, then the mainland Mao Zedong regime has every reason to open the army across the strait and eliminate the reactionary American reactionaries and their running dog Chiang Kai-shek.
Gallnecher’s remarks immediately made headlines in the British Guardian and The Times, sparking a broad and positive voice from the British public. Under the pressure of British Prime Minister Adelaide, he delivered a speech on August 15, 1950, opposing the US attempt to split Taiwan. He believed that it is dangerous for the United States to "armed and defend Taiwan."
But Attlee also has a saying that the Taiwan issue is a "pending" issue before the end of the Korean War. This laid the groundwork for the resolution of the later reactionary San Francisco meeting.
The San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951 was an official peace treaty with the Allies, and it was supposed that China participated. However, the United States has obstructed the exclusion of China and passed the "Taiwan issue is undecided" bill. It only believes that Taiwan’s sovereignty no longer belongs to Japan, and whether it will be returned to China, then the two said.
So far, the Taiwan independence elements on the island still like to take the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" when they are in the turmoil. This meeting is very poisonous, but the United Kingdom is arrogant in the United States. In order to maintain the Anglo-American alliance, it is not in San Francisco. Raise objections to the issue.
The real deterioration of Sino-British relations was after Churchill came to power again in 1952.
Let’s take a look at Churchill’s series of remarks after Churchill’s cabinet replaced Attlee’s cabinet:
"We will never allow communists to slaughter the people of Taiwan";
2. "Jiang Jieshi is the person I admire most in the Far East";
Three "Who is against communism, who is my friend."
Churchill did speak very straightforwardly. On the issue of "big and big," he didn't need to take the short-term spur of the Nobel Prize for Literature. Everything was naked.
In the second half of 1952, the United Kingdom sent a naval consultant to Taiwan, and did not cancel the consulate in Taipei. In November, the consulate also tentatively asked whether "can establish formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan," but there is no following.
The British people's mind is like this. The Communist Party's political power on the mainland has been stabilized. Although Chiang Kai-shek has an army on hand, the counter-attack of the mainland plan is too much for Menglang, and it is unlikely to be realized. The Communist Party crosses the sea to liberate Taiwan and there are American troops. If you are stunned, it is better to set up a temporary Taiwanese government and turn this interim government into the Republic of Taiwan. It is also a good thing for the United Kingdom.
In January 1953, the British Foreign Ministry legal adviser Biggs publicly stated in an interview with the BBC that the Chinese should read the international law well. The Cairo Declaration is only a declaration, not a law. What is the name? The San Francisco Peace Treaty is the law. To put it bluntly, it is still believed that Taiwan’s sovereignty is undecided and can be legally independent.
In April 1954, the British representative to the United Nations Dickson officially submitted the proposal that "Taiwan should not be returned to China" to the conference for discussion. In the opinion of the British authorities, the division of the Taiwan Strait and the separation of the Palestinians and Israelis are very similar. The United Kingdom can eat both fish and fish, and use Chiang Kai-shek to contain the mainland to safeguard Britain's interests in Southeast Asia.
Conclusion
For Taiwan’s "legal Taiwan independence," Churchill’s cabinet once illusory that the People’s Republic of China was tempted by the legitimate seat of the United Nations, meaning that the People’s Republic of China was elected to exchange for Taiwan’s independence. They obviously underestimated the ambition of the first generation of the Party Central Committee with Comrade Mao Zedong as the core (Mao Zedong once thought deeply about how to solve the Korean War and the new China into the same problem at the same time. For details, see Shen Zhihua's monograph "Mao Zedong, Stalin With the Korean War, and Chairman Mao Zedong and Premier Zhou Enlai made a slap in the face of the British cross-strait plot.
On May 10, 1952, Mao Zedong used the bell to beat the ghosts in his conversation with Mrs. Nehru, pointing out that Britain’s swing on the Taiwan issue has seriously affected the orderly development of China-UK normal diplomatic relations.
On February 27, 1958, the Chinese Chargé d’affaires in the United Kingdom, Huang Zhen, protested to the British government their close contact with the Kuomintang regime.
From 1950 to 1970, the diplomatic relations between China and Britain have always been in a relatively embarrassing and subtle state. The British missions in China have never appeared on the list of diplomatic missions in China.
The Taiwan issue 60 years ago, today's South China Sea issue, all reflect the British Bama's law: opportunism and interests supreme, all speculation, conspiracy, betrayal can be put on the legal cloak of international law, refactoring a kind of "help A positive image of the reconstruction of the regional international order. However, today's Britain... In the words of the netizens, it is humiliating to see this news 20 years ago. It was anger to see this news ten years ago. Now I see this news, hehe.
(Copyright, please contact the author if you want to reprint)
