https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-07-12/doc-ihytcerm3069733.shtml
波斯湾和南海两件事再次证明：真理与和平只在射程内
波斯湾和南海两件事再次证明：真理与和平只在射程内
1,968
伊朗快艇在波斯湾（资料图）
[环球军事快评 梳理天下大事]这几天，南海和阿拉伯海波斯湾的事情，很有意思，虽然两者相距万里。
首先是波斯湾这边。
7月4日，英国数十名海军陆战队员在直布罗陀附近水域扣押了伊朗的“格蕾丝一号”超级油轮，伊朗革命卫队一位少将随即威胁称，将对此进行报复，扣押英国油轮。
第二天，即7月5日，伊朗确定国家利益委员会秘书长穆赫辛-雷扎伊说，如果被扣油轮不能立即获释，伊朗方面应当考虑扣押一艘英国油轮，以示回应。他还说，伊朗在回应欺侮时，从来不犹豫。
又过了三天，即7月8日，伊朗国防部长哈塔米表示：我们不会容忍，也不会没有回应。
再过了一天，即7月9日，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队高级指挥官侯赛因-内扎特警告，美国在海湾的基地和航母都在伊朗导弹射程之内，美国人非常清楚与伊朗军事对抗的后果。
7月10日，伊朗总统鲁哈尼再次发出警告：英国是不安全行动的始作俑者，你们之后会了解此事的后果。
硬话、狠话说了一遍又一遍，不仅引发了英国方面的高度警惕，也吊足了全世界“吃瓜群众”的胃口。
“蒙特罗斯”号（F 236）
很快，7月11日，多家西方媒体披露，就在10日当天，霍尔木兹海峡附件，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队5艘快艇逼近了一艘英国油轮，试图命令油轮改变航向，驶到伊朗海域，紧急时刻，在附近护航的英国海军23型护卫舰“蒙特罗斯”号（F 236）将炮口瞄向了伊朗小艇，很显然，这全副武装的排水量近5000吨的战舰，配备了140毫米口径舰炮，还有两门30毫米速射炮，在几百吨的伊朗快艇面前绝对是个难以对抗的大块头，对峙的结果是伊朗快艇退走。
根据俄罗斯RT的报道，对峙事件发生后，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队发布声明说，在报道中声称的事件发生时，伊朗船只与外国船只“没有接触”。
这个声明，实际上并非如有些媒体解读的是对试图扣押英国油轮的“否认”，而是确认了对峙事件的发生，只是没有当时发生“接触”。主动撤走了，当然没有接触。
另外，不久前，伊朗议会主席团成员哈什米透露，议会正在酝酿一项在霍尔木兹海峡收取“过路费”的议案。不过，有国际观察人士认为，凭伊朗当前的海上实力，“过路费”的实施显然没有太大的可能性，在美国开始拉着地区盟友联袂组建“海湾北约”的背景下，连一艘2000吨以上水面战舰都不具备的伊朗（有3艘俄制基洛级潜艇），根本没有与强敌进行正面对抗的资本。
美军林肯号航母打击群在霍尔木兹海峡附近，拳师号两栖戒备群在曼德海峡附近。
至于，所谓封锁霍尔木兹海峡的“终极大招”，不到万不得已、山穷水尽的地步，伊朗根本不会轻易动用。1988年伊朗确实这么干过一回，然而就在4月18日一天之内，伊朗海军几乎被美军打了一个全军覆没，战事毫无悬念。
当然，伊朗的导弹力量是相当强悍的，但在目前没有必要与西方全面开战或西方并未发起大规模打击的情况下，伊朗的弹道导弹、反舰导弹还是以威慑功能为主，硬的对抗手段还是继续诉诸代理人战争。
此刻，我们想说的是，口号喊得再响，狠话说的再多，如果缺乏强大的海上力量，与强敌海军搞对抗，即便是在自己的家门口，也只能打掉牙往肚里吞。
正如东方伟人所言——美帝国主义者很傲慢，凡是可以不讲理的地方就一定不讲理……
伟人这句话的后半句是——要是讲一点理的话，那是被逼得不得已了。
我们看南海这边。
解放军在海南岛附近海域举行实弹射击演练（并非在人造岛礁）之后不久，观察者网7月11日援引美国海军研究所网站（USNI）的报道，美国海军作战部长理查德森上将与中国海军司令员9日举行了视频会议，双方讨论了维持中美海军定期对话的重要性。美方认为，双方定期对话十分重要，这可以减少双方发生误判的可能，而误判可能会迅速升级潜在的冲突。
对此，有网友评论说，谁说美国不好沟通？关键要看是否用了它听得懂的语言。
还有网友说，能攻方能守，能战方能和。
又有网友说，这再次证明真理和和平只在武器射程之内；只有显示自己的力量和决心，对方才会讲理。
我觉得，网友说得很好。亲爱的网友，你觉得呢？（环球网军事 文/综合 子非鱼 20190711）
Two things in the Persian Gulf and the South China Sea once again prove that truth and peace are only within the range.
Two things in the Persian Gulf and the South China Sea once again prove that truth and peace are only within the range.
1,968
Iranian speedboat in the Persian Gulf (data map)
[Global military quick review to sort out the world's events] These days, the South China Sea and the Arabian Sea in the Persian Gulf are very interesting, although the two are thousands of miles away.
The first is the Persian Gulf side.
On July 4th, dozens of Marines in the United Kingdom detained the Iranian "Grace No. 1" supertanker in the waters around Gibraltar. A Major General of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards immediately threatened to retaliate against the British tanker.
On the second day, on July 5, Iran’s Secretary-General of the National Interest Committee, Muhsin Rezai, said that if the tanker could not be released immediately, the Iranian side should consider seizing a British tanker to respond. He also said that Iran has never hesitated in response to bullying.
Three days later, on July 8, Iranian Defense Minister Khatami said: We will not tolerate and will not respond.
One day later, on July 9, the senior commander of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard, Hussein-Nezart, warned that the US bases and aircraft carriers in the Gulf are within the Iranian missile range. The Americans are very aware of the military confrontation with Iran. s consequence.
On July 10, Iranian President Rohani issued another warning: Britain is the initiator of insecurity, and you will understand the consequences of this.
Hard words and rumors have been said over and over again, which not only triggered a high degree of vigilance from the British side, but also suffocated the appetite of the world.
"Montrose" (F 236)
Soon, on July 11, a number of Western media revealed that on the 10th, on the 10th, the Hormuz Strait annex, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards five speedboats approached a British tanker, trying to order the tanker to change course and sail to Iran. In the sea, in an emergency, the British Navy's Type 23 frigate "Montrose" (F 236), which was escorted nearby, aimed the muzzle at the Iranian dinghy. Obviously, this fully armed battleship with a displacement of nearly 5,000 tons was equipped with 140 The millimeter caliber gun, as well as two 30mm speed guns, is definitely an incomprehensible big man in front of a few hundred tons of Iranian speedboats. The result of the confrontation is that the Iranian speedboat has retreated.
According to Russian RT reports, after the incident, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard issued a statement saying that Iranian ships "have no contact" with foreign vessels when the incidents claimed in the report occurred.
This statement is actually not as if some media interpret the "denial" of attempting to seize the British tanker, but confirms the occurrence of the confrontation, but there is no "contact" at that time. Actively withdrew, of course, no contact.
In addition, not long ago, the member of the Iranian parliamentary bureau, Hashmi, revealed that the parliament is planning a bill to collect “road tolls” in the Strait of Hormuz. However, some international observers believe that with the current maritime strength of Iran, the implementation of “tolls” is obviously not very likely. In the context of the United States starting to pull regional alliances to form the “Bay NATO”, even a 2000 Iran (with three Russian-made Kilo-class submarines), which is not available on surface warships, has no capital to confront the strong enemy.
The US Army Lincoln aircraft strike group is near the Strait of Hormuz, and the Boxer amphibious alert group is near the Mande Strait.
As for the so-called "final tricks" to block the Strait of Hormuz, Iran is not easy to use, no matter how unavoidable it is. In 1988, Iran did do this once. However, within one day of April 18, the Iranian navy was almost completely defeated by the US military. There was no suspense in the war.
Of course, Iran’s missile power is quite powerful. However, Iran’s ballistic missiles and anti-ship missiles are mainly based on deterrence, and there is no need to launch a full-scale war with the West or the West has not launched a large-scale attack. The means still continue to resort to the agent war.
At this moment, what we want to say is that the slogan is screaming again, and there are more words. If there is no strong sea power, it will fight against the strong enemy navy. Even at the door of your own home, you can only get rid of your teeth. Litton.
As the great men of the East say - the US imperialists are very arrogant, and any place that can be unreasonable must be unreasonable...
The latter part of the sentence of the great man is - if you talk about it, it is forced to be forced.
We look at the South China Sea side.
Shortly after the People’s Liberation Army conducted a live-fire drill in the waters near Hainan Island (not on the artificial island reef), the Observer Network quoted the US Naval Research Institute website (USNI) on July 11th, and the US Naval Operations Secretary, General Richardson, The Chinese naval commander held a video conference on the 9th and the two sides discussed the importance of maintaining a regular dialogue between the Chinese and US navies. The US believes that regular dialogue between the two sides is very important, which can reduce the possibility of misjudgment by both sides, and misjudgment may quickly escalate potential conflicts.
In this regard, some netizens commented that who said that the United States is not good at communication? The key is to see if you use a language that it understands.
Some netizens said that they can defend and defend themselves.
Another netizen said that this proves once again that truth and peace are only within the range of weapons; only by showing their strength and determination, the other party will be reasonable.
I think the netizens are very good. Dear friends, what do you think? (Global Network Military Text / General Sub-Fish 20190711)
波斯湾和南海两件事再次证明：真理与和平只在射程内
波斯湾和南海两件事再次证明：真理与和平只在射程内
1,968
伊朗快艇在波斯湾（资料图）
[环球军事快评 梳理天下大事]这几天，南海和阿拉伯海波斯湾的事情，很有意思，虽然两者相距万里。
首先是波斯湾这边。
7月4日，英国数十名海军陆战队员在直布罗陀附近水域扣押了伊朗的“格蕾丝一号”超级油轮，伊朗革命卫队一位少将随即威胁称，将对此进行报复，扣押英国油轮。
第二天，即7月5日，伊朗确定国家利益委员会秘书长穆赫辛-雷扎伊说，如果被扣油轮不能立即获释，伊朗方面应当考虑扣押一艘英国油轮，以示回应。他还说，伊朗在回应欺侮时，从来不犹豫。
又过了三天，即7月8日，伊朗国防部长哈塔米表示：我们不会容忍，也不会没有回应。
再过了一天，即7月9日，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队高级指挥官侯赛因-内扎特警告，美国在海湾的基地和航母都在伊朗导弹射程之内，美国人非常清楚与伊朗军事对抗的后果。
7月10日，伊朗总统鲁哈尼再次发出警告：英国是不安全行动的始作俑者，你们之后会了解此事的后果。
硬话、狠话说了一遍又一遍，不仅引发了英国方面的高度警惕，也吊足了全世界“吃瓜群众”的胃口。
“蒙特罗斯”号（F 236）
很快，7月11日，多家西方媒体披露，就在10日当天，霍尔木兹海峡附件，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队5艘快艇逼近了一艘英国油轮，试图命令油轮改变航向，驶到伊朗海域，紧急时刻，在附近护航的英国海军23型护卫舰“蒙特罗斯”号（F 236）将炮口瞄向了伊朗小艇，很显然，这全副武装的排水量近5000吨的战舰，配备了140毫米口径舰炮，还有两门30毫米速射炮，在几百吨的伊朗快艇面前绝对是个难以对抗的大块头，对峙的结果是伊朗快艇退走。
根据俄罗斯RT的报道，对峙事件发生后，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队发布声明说，在报道中声称的事件发生时，伊朗船只与外国船只“没有接触”。
这个声明，实际上并非如有些媒体解读的是对试图扣押英国油轮的“否认”，而是确认了对峙事件的发生，只是没有当时发生“接触”。主动撤走了，当然没有接触。
另外，不久前，伊朗议会主席团成员哈什米透露，议会正在酝酿一项在霍尔木兹海峡收取“过路费”的议案。不过，有国际观察人士认为，凭伊朗当前的海上实力，“过路费”的实施显然没有太大的可能性，在美国开始拉着地区盟友联袂组建“海湾北约”的背景下，连一艘2000吨以上水面战舰都不具备的伊朗（有3艘俄制基洛级潜艇），根本没有与强敌进行正面对抗的资本。
美军林肯号航母打击群在霍尔木兹海峡附近，拳师号两栖戒备群在曼德海峡附近。
至于，所谓封锁霍尔木兹海峡的“终极大招”，不到万不得已、山穷水尽的地步，伊朗根本不会轻易动用。1988年伊朗确实这么干过一回，然而就在4月18日一天之内，伊朗海军几乎被美军打了一个全军覆没，战事毫无悬念。
当然，伊朗的导弹力量是相当强悍的，但在目前没有必要与西方全面开战或西方并未发起大规模打击的情况下，伊朗的弹道导弹、反舰导弹还是以威慑功能为主，硬的对抗手段还是继续诉诸代理人战争。
此刻，我们想说的是，口号喊得再响，狠话说的再多，如果缺乏强大的海上力量，与强敌海军搞对抗，即便是在自己的家门口，也只能打掉牙往肚里吞。
正如东方伟人所言——美帝国主义者很傲慢，凡是可以不讲理的地方就一定不讲理……
伟人这句话的后半句是——要是讲一点理的话，那是被逼得不得已了。
我们看南海这边。
解放军在海南岛附近海域举行实弹射击演练（并非在人造岛礁）之后不久，观察者网7月11日援引美国海军研究所网站（USNI）的报道，美国海军作战部长理查德森上将与中国海军司令员9日举行了视频会议，双方讨论了维持中美海军定期对话的重要性。美方认为，双方定期对话十分重要，这可以减少双方发生误判的可能，而误判可能会迅速升级潜在的冲突。
对此，有网友评论说，谁说美国不好沟通？关键要看是否用了它听得懂的语言。
还有网友说，能攻方能守，能战方能和。
又有网友说，这再次证明真理和和平只在武器射程之内；只有显示自己的力量和决心，对方才会讲理。
我觉得，网友说得很好。亲爱的网友，你觉得呢？（环球网军事 文/综合 子非鱼 20190711）
Two things in the Persian Gulf and the South China Sea once again prove that truth and peace are only within the range.
Two things in the Persian Gulf and the South China Sea once again prove that truth and peace are only within the range.
1,968
Iranian speedboat in the Persian Gulf (data map)
[Global military quick review to sort out the world's events] These days, the South China Sea and the Arabian Sea in the Persian Gulf are very interesting, although the two are thousands of miles away.
The first is the Persian Gulf side.
On July 4th, dozens of Marines in the United Kingdom detained the Iranian "Grace No. 1" supertanker in the waters around Gibraltar. A Major General of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards immediately threatened to retaliate against the British tanker.
On the second day, on July 5, Iran’s Secretary-General of the National Interest Committee, Muhsin Rezai, said that if the tanker could not be released immediately, the Iranian side should consider seizing a British tanker to respond. He also said that Iran has never hesitated in response to bullying.
Three days later, on July 8, Iranian Defense Minister Khatami said: We will not tolerate and will not respond.
One day later, on July 9, the senior commander of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard, Hussein-Nezart, warned that the US bases and aircraft carriers in the Gulf are within the Iranian missile range. The Americans are very aware of the military confrontation with Iran. s consequence.
On July 10, Iranian President Rohani issued another warning: Britain is the initiator of insecurity, and you will understand the consequences of this.
Hard words and rumors have been said over and over again, which not only triggered a high degree of vigilance from the British side, but also suffocated the appetite of the world.
"Montrose" (F 236)
Soon, on July 11, a number of Western media revealed that on the 10th, on the 10th, the Hormuz Strait annex, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards five speedboats approached a British tanker, trying to order the tanker to change course and sail to Iran. In the sea, in an emergency, the British Navy's Type 23 frigate "Montrose" (F 236), which was escorted nearby, aimed the muzzle at the Iranian dinghy. Obviously, this fully armed battleship with a displacement of nearly 5,000 tons was equipped with 140 The millimeter caliber gun, as well as two 30mm speed guns, is definitely an incomprehensible big man in front of a few hundred tons of Iranian speedboats. The result of the confrontation is that the Iranian speedboat has retreated.
According to Russian RT reports, after the incident, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard issued a statement saying that Iranian ships "have no contact" with foreign vessels when the incidents claimed in the report occurred.
This statement is actually not as if some media interpret the "denial" of attempting to seize the British tanker, but confirms the occurrence of the confrontation, but there is no "contact" at that time. Actively withdrew, of course, no contact.
In addition, not long ago, the member of the Iranian parliamentary bureau, Hashmi, revealed that the parliament is planning a bill to collect “road tolls” in the Strait of Hormuz. However, some international observers believe that with the current maritime strength of Iran, the implementation of “tolls” is obviously not very likely. In the context of the United States starting to pull regional alliances to form the “Bay NATO”, even a 2000 Iran (with three Russian-made Kilo-class submarines), which is not available on surface warships, has no capital to confront the strong enemy.
The US Army Lincoln aircraft strike group is near the Strait of Hormuz, and the Boxer amphibious alert group is near the Mande Strait.
As for the so-called "final tricks" to block the Strait of Hormuz, Iran is not easy to use, no matter how unavoidable it is. In 1988, Iran did do this once. However, within one day of April 18, the Iranian navy was almost completely defeated by the US military. There was no suspense in the war.
Of course, Iran’s missile power is quite powerful. However, Iran’s ballistic missiles and anti-ship missiles are mainly based on deterrence, and there is no need to launch a full-scale war with the West or the West has not launched a large-scale attack. The means still continue to resort to the agent war.
At this moment, what we want to say is that the slogan is screaming again, and there are more words. If there is no strong sea power, it will fight against the strong enemy navy. Even at the door of your own home, you can only get rid of your teeth. Litton.
As the great men of the East say - the US imperialists are very arrogant, and any place that can be unreasonable must be unreasonable...
The latter part of the sentence of the great man is - if you talk about it, it is forced to be forced.
We look at the South China Sea side.
Shortly after the People’s Liberation Army conducted a live-fire drill in the waters near Hainan Island (not on the artificial island reef), the Observer Network quoted the US Naval Research Institute website (USNI) on July 11th, and the US Naval Operations Secretary, General Richardson, The Chinese naval commander held a video conference on the 9th and the two sides discussed the importance of maintaining a regular dialogue between the Chinese and US navies. The US believes that regular dialogue between the two sides is very important, which can reduce the possibility of misjudgment by both sides, and misjudgment may quickly escalate potential conflicts.
In this regard, some netizens commented that who said that the United States is not good at communication? The key is to see if you use a language that it understands.
Some netizens said that they can defend and defend themselves.
Another netizen said that this proves once again that truth and peace are only within the range of weapons; only by showing their strength and determination, the other party will be reasonable.
I think the netizens are very good. Dear friends, what do you think? (Global Network Military Text / General Sub-Fish 20190711)
