• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

China Cancer Villages: Price of GDP mania

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
Industrial Pollution Creates Cancer Village in China

Almost every family in the village has someone suffering from cancer.
One in two babies born have birth defects.
The air is almost unbreakable.
GDP data is all that matters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU2bfYzPZTQ

HONG KONG (Reuters) - One needs to look no further then the river that runs through Shangba to understand the extent of the heavy metals pollution that experts say has turned the hamlets in this region of southern China into cancer villages.

The river's flow ranges from murky white to a bright shade of orange and the waters are so viscous that they barely ripple in the breeze. In Shangba, the river brings death, not sustenance.

"All the fish died, even chickens and ducks that drank from the river died. If you put your leg in the water, you'll get rashes and a terrible itch," said He Shuncai, a 34-year-old rice farmer who has lived in Shangba all his life.

"Last year alone, six people in our village died from cancer and they were in their 30s and 40s."

Cancer casts a shadow over the villages in this region of China in southern Guangdong province, nestled among farmland contaminated by heavy metals used to make batteries, computer parts and other electronics devices.

Every year, an estimated 460,000 people die prematurely in China due to exposure to air and water pollution, according to a 2007 World Bank study.

Yun Yaoshun's two granddaughters died at the ages of 12 and 18, succumbing to kidney and stomach cancer even though these types of cancers rarely affect children. The World Health Organization has suggested that the high rate of such digestive cancers are due to the ingestion of polluted water.

"It's because of Daboshan and the dirty water," said the 82-year-old grandmother. "The girls were always playing in the river, even our well water is contaminated," Yun told Reuters during a visit to the village.

The river where the children played stretches from the bottom of the Daboshan mine, owned by state-owned Guangdong Dabaoshan Mining Co Ltd, past the ramshackle family home. Its waters are contaminated by cadmium, lead, indium and zinc and other metals.

The villagers use well water in Shangba for drinking but tests published by BioMed Central in July show that it contains excessive amounts of cadmium, a heavy metal that is a known carcinogen, as well as zinc which in large quantities can damage the liver and lead to cancer.

"China has many 'cancer villages' and it is very likely that these increased cases of cancer are due to water pollution," said Edward Chan, an official with Greenpeace in southern China.

But it's not just water, the carcinogenic heavy metals are also entering the food chain.

Mounds of tailings from mineral mining are discarded alongside paddy fields throughout the region.

"If you test this rice, it will be toxic but we eat it too, otherwise, we will starve," said He, the farmer, as he shoveled freshly milled rice into a sack. "Yes, we sell this rice too."

NO HEALTH CARE

Few families in the villages downstream from the Daboshan mine have been left untouched by cancer.

The most common cancers are those of the stomach, liver, kidney and colon, accounting for about 85 percent of cancers. Cancer incidence rates in these villages are not available, but rights groups say they are far higher than the national average.

"In southern China, where communities depend largely from ponds or lakes for drinking water, the rates of digestive system cancer are very high," said a report 'Environment and People's Health in China', published by the World Health Organization and United Nations Development Programme in 2001.

Across China, there are hundreds, perhaps thousands of small, anonymous villages that are suffering the consequences of the country's rapid economic expansion, villages with rates and types of cancers that experts say can only be due to pollution.

This may be the fate of more and more of China's population as mines and factories spew out tens of millions of tonnes of pollution every year, into the water system as well as the air, to produce the fruits of China's economic growth.

Death rates from cancer rose 19 percent in cities and 23 percent in rural areas in 2006, compared to 2005, according to official Chinese media, although they did not give exact figures.

The health burden has an economic price. The cost of cancer treatment has reached almost 100 billion yuan a year ($14.6 billion), accounting for 20 percent of China's medical expenditure, according to Chinese media.

NO COMPENSATION

The lack of a national health system means that most of the victims must pay their medical bills themselves.

Healthcare costs took up 50 percent of household income in China in 2006 due to inadequate health insurance, according to a paper published in the Lancet in October 2008.

China does not have a comprehensive state healthcare system and more than 80 percent of farmers have no medical insurance at all, although there are plans for sweeping reforms so that by 2011, most of the population will have basic medical coverage.

The residents of so called cancer villages, meanwhile, struggle to fund their medical care, often going into debt to pay crippling pharmaceutical and doctors' bills.

"An official did come to give me our compensation, 20 yuan ($2.93)," said Liang Xiti, whose husband died of stomach cancer at the age of 46. His medicines alone cost the family 800 yuan a month, she said.

Zhang Jingjing, a lawyer who is helping the villagers, said the local mine has promised to distribute a few thousands yuan to all the villagers every year.

Even though the funds will barely cover medical expenses, Zhang says it is an encouraging first step.

"This means the mine admits it is polluting the environment. If it did no wrong, it won't give out this money."

(Editing by Megan Goldin)

 
Last edited:
Industrial pollution is a problem in 3rd world nations. Especially those with a strong manufacturing that can help the country out of 3rd world status. If you remain as an agriculture based economy then you will not have industrial pollution because you do not even have an industry to talk of.

The Chinese are trying to alleviate the issues and they have the $$$ to do it.
Put it this way without industry your economy can't lift itself out of poverty. In ag based economy if it does not rain your GDP is off 2 to 3%. With industrialisation you face industrial pollution but with the $$ made from industrialisation you can invest in pollution control devices. Unless it is a case where government leaders are in cahoots with industrialist who funnel their $$ overseas. I do not see to much of that in Beijing's case.

Another thing, without GDP growth your country will be left in the boon docks and the gov will not have the $$$ needed to improve lives of citizens.
 
Industrial pollution is a problem in 3rd world nations. Especially those with a strong manufacturing that can help the country out of 3rd world status. If you remain as an agriculture based economy then you will not have industrial pollution because you do not even have an industry to talk of.

The Chinese are trying to alleviate the issues and they have the $$$ to do it.
Put it this way without industry your economy can't lift itself out of poverty. In ag based economy if it does not rain your GDP is off 2 to 3%. With industrialisation you face industrial pollution but with the $$ made from industrialisation you can invest in pollution control devices. Unless it is a case where government leaders are in cahoots with industrialist who funnel their $$ overseas. I do not see to much of that in Beijing's case.

Another thing, without GDP growth your country will be left in the boon docks and the gov will not have the $$$ needed to improve lives of citizens.

That is a simplistic argument.
Do you need to destroy lives, rivers, villages all in the name of
economic development ?..especially when there is no cap on how
much growth rate is enough growth rate ?..

Development is to improve the lives of the people.
Not destroy it.

Any development that destroy lives is not worth having in the first place.
There is no excuse at all..third world country or first world country..does
not matter.

Ultimately it is the people who make the country.
Not the big airports, stadiums and highways.
 
It is not a simplistic argument - it is fact of life. If they have 1st world pollution standards where they need to do env impact study to even build a factory, they would have lost the cost advantage. MNCs would just build the factory at home.

Why do you think they are breaking ships in India and Bangladesh. Here we have people with no protection (barefoot and loin cloth) at all tearing apart old ships and they are exposed to asbestos, heavy metals, PCB - you name it they have it. But go ask this workers. They are probably happy doing that work since its pays more.

Well reason is that to do that in US or EU it would cost you 50 times the price! It was recent anniversary of Union Carbide in Bhopal. People living there are still feel the effects. UC paid $2K to $3K per Indian life. 10K died!

You see life in cheap in the 3rd world. So the only way out is industralization. Without that you have no $$$ and without that you cannot even build proper toilets and sewer systems. Why even need to worry about industrial waste when your young dies from contaminated water!!!

So countries have to industrialize fast and once they have the money, plough that back into pollution control and cleantech.




That is a simplistic argument.
Do you need to destroy lives, rivers, villages all in the name of
economic development ?..especially when there is no cap on how
much growth rate is enough growth rate ?..

Development is to improve the lives of the people.
Not destroy it.

Any development that destroy lives is not worth having in the first place.
There is no excuse at all..third world country or first world country..does
not matter.

Ultimately it is the people who make the country.
Not the big airports, stadiums and highways.
 
typical... money above everything else, a predominantly chinese trait
 
Why do you think they are breaking ships in India and Bangladesh. Here we have people with no protection (barefoot and loin cloth) at all tearing apart old ships and they are exposed to asbestos, heavy metals, PCB - you name it they have it. But go ask this workers. They are probably happy doing that work since its pays more.

Well reason is that to do that in US or EU it would cost you 50 times the price! It was recent anniversary of Union Carbide in Bhopal. People living there are still feel the effects. UC paid $2K to $3K per Indian life. 10K died!

You see life in cheap in the 3rd world. So the only way out is industralization. Without that you have no $$$ and without that you cannot even build proper toilets and sewer systems. Why even need to worry about industrial waste when your young dies from contaminated water!!!

So countries have to industrialize fast and once they have the money, plough that back into pollution control and cleantech.

hmm..we should ask those villagers who are terminally ill with cancer or the parents of the deformed kids..are they happy with what they have..and would like to continue giving their lives for providing goods 50 times cheaper to Europe and USA...just ask them..interesting to know their answer.

Unlike the workers in India and Bangladesh, did these people have any choice in defying the iron hand of the communist party officials who decide who lives and who dies ?
 
as i know that it is not that serious, and you guys may check out the fact....
 
you dun yah yah, we have young singaporeans dropping dead once in a while....one by one

guess what's the cause?
 
The good of the many outweight the good of the few. Unfortuantely that is the way life is in the 3rd world. Look at the number of people lifted above poverty and the child mortality rate. Look at how many lives they have saved from starvation.

hmm..we should ask those villagers who are terminally ill with cancer or the parents of the deformed kids..are they happy with what they have..and would like to continue giving their lives for providing goods 50 times cheaper to Europe and USA...just ask them..interesting to know their answer.

Unlike the workers in India and Bangladesh, did these people have any choice in defying the iron hand of the communist party officials who decide who lives and who dies ?
 
Back
Top