<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Sep 28, 2008
YOUR LETTERS
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Check risk exposure of financial firms
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I refer to last Sunday's report, 'Before you surrender your AIA policy...'.
One cannot blame American International Assurance (AIA) policyholders for wishing to cash out their investment-linked products and other insurance policies which have matured and have positive cash values.
After all, most policyholders buy these products because they want to build up their retirement funds, as well as get the necessary insurance protection.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and AIA Singapore have assured policyholders that AIA has sufficient assets in its insurance funds to meet its liabilities, and urged them not to terminate their policies rashly as they could lose cover and suffer losses.
It would be better if the MAS could assure AIA policyholders that their insurance funds are secure, and not invested in sub-prime- linked investments.
DBS Bank is also facing a challenging time over investment products linked to the now-bankrupt
Lehman Brothers. It is time the bank proved to its customers and investors that it deserves their continued trust.
If it loses the confidence of its customers, it will be difficult to regain it, especially in a time of credit crunch and financial turmoil.
The MAS should regulate all non-capital-protected investments and watch closely the credit/risk exposure of all financial institutions here.
I was very surprised that a bank has sent my teenage son a pre-approved credit card, even though he is still a student.
Last but not least, I hope the MAS could get all local financial institutions to clearly explain to all their customers just how 'insignificant' their sub-prime or investment losses, or exposure to Lehman, are. David Goh
Neh!
YOUR LETTERS
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Check risk exposure of financial firms
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I refer to last Sunday's report, 'Before you surrender your AIA policy...'.
One cannot blame American International Assurance (AIA) policyholders for wishing to cash out their investment-linked products and other insurance policies which have matured and have positive cash values.
After all, most policyholders buy these products because they want to build up their retirement funds, as well as get the necessary insurance protection.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and AIA Singapore have assured policyholders that AIA has sufficient assets in its insurance funds to meet its liabilities, and urged them not to terminate their policies rashly as they could lose cover and suffer losses.
It would be better if the MAS could assure AIA policyholders that their insurance funds are secure, and not invested in sub-prime- linked investments.
DBS Bank is also facing a challenging time over investment products linked to the now-bankrupt
Lehman Brothers. It is time the bank proved to its customers and investors that it deserves their continued trust.
If it loses the confidence of its customers, it will be difficult to regain it, especially in a time of credit crunch and financial turmoil.
The MAS should regulate all non-capital-protected investments and watch closely the credit/risk exposure of all financial institutions here.
I was very surprised that a bank has sent my teenage son a pre-approved credit card, even though he is still a student.
Last but not least, I hope the MAS could get all local financial institutions to clearly explain to all their customers just how 'insignificant' their sub-prime or investment losses, or exposure to Lehman, are. David Goh
Neh!