Can TR Emeritus Be Trusted?

[kryonlight]

In their latest article "tr-emeritus-is-a-responsible-sociopolitical-news-blog-and-not-a-‘no-holds-barred’-site", their editor said: "This TRE is not the former TR ..."

Since they are admitting now that TR Emeritus is a different creature from the former Temasek Review (TR), don't you think they should have given a distinct name and made a distinct blog design to differentiate themselves from the former Temasek Review (TR) and subsequently Temasek Review Emeritus?

Not doing so makes one suspect that they are subtly misleading readers by unscrupulously building on the good reputation of the former Temasek Review (TR) to shore up their reader base.

I have posted a comment on their article highlighting this issue, but they simply censored it.

Anyway, in my opinion, I think TR Emeritus cannot be trusted. They were the first to break the story on Yaw, followed up intensely by the MSM. In my conjecture, this was all planned and plotted to do WP in from both sides. The apology was only a side show. The only thing they didn't expected was the expulsion.

Do you have any other conspiracy theories on this? Please share.

 

[myfoot123]

Nope, TRe has chosen to be tamed. It no longer is wild like before.

 

[Alamaking]

Fucked up website....

 

[Kim101]

Lee Hsien Yang and TR Emeritus Controversy

Sociopolitical website TR Emeritus (TRE) explained in a statement on Thursday why it intends to resist legal action brought on by Mr Lee Hsien Yang, saying that his case is different from that of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

http://www.theworldnews.in/2012/02/23/lee-hsien-yang-and-tr-emeritus-controversy/

 

[tonychat]

In their latest article "tr-emeritus-is-a-responsible-sociopolitical-news-blog-and-not-a-‘no-holds-barred’-site", their editor said: "This TRE is not the former TR ..."

Since they are admitting now that TR Emeritus is a different creature from the former Temasek Review (TR), don't you think they should have given a distinct name and made a distinct blog design to differentiate themselves from the former Temasek Review (TR) and subsequently Temasek Review Emeritus?

Not doing so makes one suspect that they are subtly misleading readers by unscrupulously building on the good reputation of the former Temasek Review (TR) to shore up their reader base.

I have posted a comment on their article highlighting this issue, but they simply censored it.

Anyway, in my opinion, I think TR Emeritus cannot be trusted. They were the first to break the story on Yaw, followed up intensely by the MSM. In my conjecture, this was all planned and plotted to do WP in from both sides. The apology was only a side show. The only thing they didn't expected was the expulsion.

Do you have any other conspiracy theories on this? Please share.

then create your own website for that lah... talk so much , sinkie!!!

 

[CakeLengKia]

i wonder is our dear Dr Joseph Ong Chor Teck still leading TRE?

 

[refulgence]

TRE can shut down and revive under a different guise.

 

[Char_Azn]

TRE is a fucked up website that should have been closed down years ago. On the other hand freaking LHY is overreacting

 

[Scrooball (clone)]

Can you trust a used car salesman?

Can you trust a MP born in the year of the dog?

Can you trust someone who tell you that GST helps the poor?

 

[blueyepea]

Although TRE published apology to LHL, they are keeping mum on whether they give details of 'Matthew Chua" to LHL lawyers. The writer is really screwed by Richard Wan, who earlier assured him that his id is safe with TRE.

 

[leetahbar]

kojabkt repeated the same using 3in1 kopitiam which is a copycat of the demised sammbyboyalfresco.

most of the postings were mere petty recurring squabblings. it was such a disappointment!