• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

can a prospective candidate be a dual political party member?

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
jaslyn go or the notorious lamei is gen-secy of USD. fine with that. but then look again at SDP's GE candidates line-up. we see jaslyn go again representing SDP standing in an "unknown" ward.

puzzling! why does SDP need to start such confusion? does fishmonger's wife lamei stand even a chance to retrieve her GE deposit?

if USD can also be SDP; then SDP can definitely be PAP. their motive: to confuse voters; dilute votes and most importantly ensure victory for PAP's incumbent candidate.

this what i mean:

if say there is only PAP vs NSP. both of their chances is 50/50. with the inclusion of SDP creating a 3-corner fight, the result would be a sure-win by PAP. some may choose sdp, say maybe 10% and maybe 42 % choose NSP. the remaining 48% vote for PAP.
pap wins. if without the sdp, maybe the 10% would go to NSP which would end up with a 52%. nsp wins.

now u see the real presence of SDP, do remember DO NOT TO VOTE FOR THEM. just ignore and tick other opps that is representing your ward.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
that's proved a warped political theory:

dual political party member is also as good as PARTYLESS and definitely PANTYLESS.

LOL!!:biggrin:
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
why is another party not representing for itself but for another and yet ranting being partyless while being pantyless?
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Mar 23, 2011
NSP's offer confuses voters

THE offer by National Solidarity Party's (NSP) secretary-general Goh Meng Seng ('NSP 'prepared to make way for Workers' Party''; yesterday) is an example of what Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean meant when he highlighted the need for the electorate to cast their votes for the party and candidate whom they can trust.

How can the electorate of Moulmein-Kallang GRC trust NSP's candidates when the party says it is prepared to give way to the Workers' Party to avoid a three-cornered fight?

All that Mr Goh has done is to confuse the electorate of Moulmein-Kallang GRC and embolden them to re-elect the People's Action Party.

S. Ramamirtham

if like that, gms "was accused of confusing, then what about SDP and USD which are the real confusion-makers?
 
Top