• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

British Singapore Improvement Trust Vs Familee's $-Sucking HDB

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Which is really looking after Sporns' housing needs? Which is really after Sporns' $?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singapore_Improvement_Trust

Singapore Improvement Trust

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to: navigation, search
<!-- start content -->
Housing built by SIT at Tiong Bahru, Singapore.



Same group of housing, from a bird's eye view.


The Singapore Improvement Trust (SIT) was a government organisation set up in 1927 by the British colonial government in Singapore in response to the housing needs of the population of Singapore. At that time, many people resided in overcrowded shophouses and squatter settlements, resulting in widespread disease and lack of hygiene and sanitation. Often, over 200 people would live in one shophouse. This also generated massive civil unrest and crime.
The SIT was composed of professional architects and contractors to resolve this large social problem, with the goal of building affordable public housing for the common population of Singapore. However, SIT managed to build only 23,000 housing units in 32 years, unable to find an effective solution to lack of housing as the population grew faster than it built housing units. It was eventually replaced by the Housing and Development Board (HDB), which in contrast managed to build 110,000 housing units within less than a third of that time. On the other hand, flats built by HDB then are almost identical in their two-dimensional “matchbox” style; This is in contrast with the aesthetic art deco theme undertaken by SIT.
 

DIVISION1

Alfrescian
Loyal
We have improved the asset values of Singaporeans and it will provide a nest egg during retirement. The PAP has a done an excellent job that SIT could not achieve.
 

DerekLeung

Alfrescian
Loyal
You can still sell affordable housing to citizens for a token of $1 - $50,000 for goodwill and citizens will have more money to circulate around for the economic downturn !
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
do you think SIT can accommodate the rising population and aspiration of the singaporeans? come on man. SIT is a remnant of the past. it's obsolete to serve the needs of a modern singapore.
 

DIVISION1

Alfrescian
Loyal
do you think SIT can accommodate the rising population and aspiration of the singaporeans? come on man. SIT is a remnant of the past. it's obsolete to serve the needs of a modern singapore.

Yes, moniker theblackhole! You hit it spot on. We need more people like you in Singapore for Singapore to be successful!
 

theblackhole

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
phrase the good lord we have the wisest man in our MM LKY. hallelujah.Singapore will not sink below the cesspool. we'll survive and we'll pull thru this depression. majulah singapura!!!
 
Top