• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Breaking: Zip Broken Must Call 999!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Elderly couple missing flight: Authorities explain
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->WE REFER to Mr Loy Zhi-Yang's letter 'A traumatic birthday for mum at airport' (March 2). We are sorry to learn of the circumstances that led to his parents' trip being delayed and the unhappy incident that marred the trip on his mum's birthday.
We have reviewed the CCTV recordings and interviewed the staff involved. Our investigations show that a Certis Cisco security screening officer assisted Mrs Loy to zip her hand-carried bag after seeing that she was having difficulty closing it. After it was zipped up, Mr and Mrs Loy left the security screening point. Ten minutes later, they returned and highlighted that their bag was damaged. They then asked to meet the superior of the officer who had assisted them earlier.
The duty supervisor from the Airport Police Security Screening Unit spoke with Mr and Mrs Loy and requested that they provide their particulars for follow-up by the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) as they were nearing their departure time.
The duty supervisor also explained that although he had informed both the CAAS and the police, they need not wait for the police as they might miss their flight. Mr and Mrs Loy then proceeded for their boarding after providing their particulars. However, we are sorry that they still did not make it onto their flight.
Certis Cisco will be contacting them as part of its commitment to service excellence.
Nevertheless, we are pleased that our CAAS duty terminal manager Ong Shu Ting helped to rebook Mr and Mrs Loy on the next flight upon learning about the incident. She also offered to pay their rebooking charges of $282 out of goodwill. They departed smoothly on the next available flight to Macau.
At Changi Airport, we are keenly aware of the importance of customer service. Front-line staff are trained and reminded to provide the same level of customer service to all passengers travelling from all terminals.
We would advise all passengers to ensure they have adequate time at the checkpoints at the airport as we strive to achieve a balance between security, efficiency and service. This incident reminds us that we still have room for improvement and we hope to serve Mr and Mrs Loy better the next time they use Changi Airport.
Sahiman Meean
Assistant General Manager, Operations
Certis Cisco Aviation Security

Yeo Kia Thye
Director (Airport Operations)
Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore
DSP Paul Tay
Assistant Director (Media Relations)
Singapore Police Force
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=Post style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Inform police over such a trivial matter. Something certainly sounds unusual here. Did the elderly couple really appear that menacing to the customs officer?
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: ImpPoster at Sat Mar 14 12:13:32 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=AlternatePost style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>airlines these days do not bother to locate passengers.... it happened to me twice (with Singapore Airlines). Once, I checked in early but arrived at the gate slightly less than 10 mins before take off. They just offloaded my baggage and said I could not board the plane. On the next occasion, I was offloaded before I arrived at check-in counter 50 minutes (and not at least 60 mins) despite having done internet check-in and with no check-in baggage.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: rncj at Sat Mar 14 12:01:16 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=Post style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Were the passengers luggage already checked in? If so the airplane shouldn't take off without the passengers, but should unload the luggage first.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: 7Prism0808 at Sat Mar 14 10:08:00 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE class=AlternatePost style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>It is a basic security protocol that when a checked in passenger did not board the plane, the flight should not take off and every effort be made to find the whereabouts of such passenger. Was there a breach?
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: NSVenkataraman at Sat Mar 14 09:31:53 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Must be a really cock family. Can miss a flight over a zip and some more, hand carry baggage. The son also not very truthful.

No one however exp-lained why the Police was needed.
 

commoner

Alfrescian
Loyal
i think mr/mrs Loy both backside itchy,,, near departure time liao still complain here and there,,,,

left screening point and then 10 min come back,,,, complain,,,,, stupid like that,,,, who knows the hubby/wife went away and spoilt the bag and wanna take advantage of the service,,, KNS

re-booking fees of $282, CAAS pay for what,,,, cheapskate couples, must be flying on budget
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"We would advise all passengers to ensure they have adequate time at the checkpoints at the airport as we strive to achieve a balance between security, efficiency and service. This incident reminds us that we still have room for improvement and we hope to serve Mr and Mrs Loy better the next time they use Changi Airport. '

Speaking words of wisdom " LET IT BE"..what to do already happened..."LET IT BE"!!
 
Top