So after the fire started, the issue is laid to rest rather swiftly. Any bros here want to guess why?
I can only conclude that VB must have been worried to rock the gay votes and that he is seemingly acting out of line with MM Lee's words that he is fine with gays. As scroobal mentioned, although the real issue is the 'gay age of consent issue', many commoners interpreted it as an attack on gays.
In fact, many of my colleagues who are heterosexual, thought that VB went too far in this mudslinging. And they are just fence-sitters.
I can only conclude that VB must have been worried to rock the gay votes and that he is seemingly acting out of line with MM Lee's words that he is fine with gays. As scroobal mentioned, although the real issue is the 'gay age of consent issue', many commoners interpreted it as an attack on gays.
In fact, many of my colleagues who are heterosexual, thought that VB went too far in this mudslinging. And they are just fence-sitters.