• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

bottomless abyss to re-capitalize American Banks

Think_PAP

Alfrescian
Loyal
They are eventually going to die no matter how much money you helped them with, or how many times to give tax payers hand-outs to these US banks. They are rotting away like dinosaurs and will just perish regardless of what you do. The entire USA is going to die with these dinosaur banks by kept bleeding for them and feeding them.

It is naive to see these crisis as temporary conditions. They are transition phenomenas of a major new scenario and phase of history. That is the USA no longer be the superpower, like the Soviet Union which is gone forever.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090428...lYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA2JhbmtvZmFtZXJpYw--



Bank of America, Citigroup may need more capital
AP


10 mins ago

WASHINGTON – Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc., which have each received $45 billion in government bailout funds, have been told by regulators that "stress test" results show they may need to raise additional capital, The Wall Street Journal said Tuesday.

Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America is looking at a shortfall in the billions of dollars, the paper said, citing people familiar with the situation. Both banks plan to rebut the preliminary findings, according to the paper, with Bank of America expected to respond Tuesday ahead of its shareholder meeting Wednesday.

Bank of America declined to comment.

Citigroup said in a statement, "Until the results of the stress tests are announced, our regulators have prohibited all financial institutions, including Citi, from making any comments related to the stress tests."

A Citi spokesman added that the bank is continuing with its plan to exchange debt for equity and shed assets as part of a program to further bolster its capital position.

Citi has reached a basic agreement to sell its Japanese brokerage unit, Nikko Cordial, to Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. for 500 billion yen ($5.2 billion), according to The Nikkei business newspaper. Citi declined to comment on the potential sale of the unit.

Shares of Citigroup fell 18 cents, or 5.9 percent, to $2.89 in morning trading. Bank of America shares declined 59 cents, or 6.6 percent, to $8.33.

Treasury Department spokesman Andrew Williams said Treasury officials would not comment on whether regulators told Bank of America and Citigroup they may need to raise more capital.

As executives of the nation's largest banks review their stress-test results, even the top performers are lobbying regulators to raise their scores before the numbers are finalized Friday.

Fed officials told reporters Friday that all 19 banks that took its "stress tests" will be required to keep an extra buffer of capital reserves beyond what is required now in case losses continue to mount. That would mean some banks will likely have to raise additional cash. But the Fed stressed in a statement that a bank's need for more capital reserves to meet the requirements should not be considered a measure of the "current solvency or viability of the firm."

Federal Reserve officials held top-secret meetings with bank executives last week to give them preliminary findings of how each bank would fare if the recession got much worse. The government plans to announce the results of the tests May 4, and banks will have the opportunity to appeal the findings.

By law, the banks cannot publicize the results without the government's permission.

Executives sifted through the test results over the weekend, devising arguments they hope will persuade regulators to boost their scores, according to two industry officials who requested anonymity because regulators have barred them from discussing the process.

Banks have until Tuesday to make their cases. They will receive the final test results Friday, and the information will be released next week.

The results will determine the fates of the companies, which together hold one-half of the U.S. banking system's loans. Banks found to need more capital face several possibilities: The government could convert its stake in them to common shares, force them to raise money from investors or eventually release more funds from the Treasury Department's $700 billion financial bailout.

For Treasury, the easiest way to bolster bank balance sheets is to convert the government's existing stake from preferred shares — a form of debt — into common shares that carry voting rights. This would help Treasury avoid returning to Congress for more bailout money — a request lawmakers are likely to rebuff.

The banks' options are designed to ensure banks have enough cash to withstand the mounting loan losses they would absorb in a bleaker economy.

If the test showed a bank would need more money to endure a much worse recession, regulators will force it to meet higher standards for capital reserves, to offset possible future losses.

Banks deemed to have enough capital may learn whether they'll be permitted to repay billions of dollars the government injected into them last fall, analysts and officials said. Most large banks have said they want to repay the money to escape executive compensation limits and other obligations.

Investors have grown more concerned about regional banks with many risky loans on their books. Defaults on those loans could skyrocket in a worsening economy. Banks that carry such loans are likely to be asked to improve their capital reserves.

___

AP Business Writer Stephen Bernard reported from New York.
 

Eurekas

Alfrescian
Loyal
Obama need to control the salaries of the top executives and increase government regulations of the banks to prevent them from milking the bank even when the economy is good for the further good of the bank.
 

think_lees

Alfrescian
Loyal
Obama need to control the salaries of the top executives and increase government regulations of the banks to prevent them from milking the bank even when the economy is good for the further good of the bank.

Not sufficient. The money is heavily drained not just in salaries. The businesses of banks are at heavy losses, bad debts can not collect and they still kept lending out. Property prices down down down. You use tax payers money to fill that bottomless hole? Entire country will bankrupt!
 

ejected.president

Alfrescian
Loyal
If Obama kept handing out public funds to these failing banks billions after billions, then he is no difference from Ho Jinx and GIC Temasek.

 

AhLeePaPa

Alfrescian
Loyal
Temasek is itself a bottomless pit lah.

How to invest more billions when they got too many long term investments & those multi-million dollar directors :confused:

Precisely!

Then via the SATELLITE VISION of that old idiot Lee Kuan Yew, they dumped out final savings into these failed banks, just to suck on his Ang Moh masters.


:oIo::oIo::oIo: LKY
 
Top