• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Boomer people getting more and more self entitled....

Houri

Stupidman
Loyal

博愛座讓座問題爆衝突 23歲男遭「推頭撞窗戶」
tw.news.yahoo.com
b8576a0f17e46f31e2e8ea50b1aee8b7
又有因為博愛座爆發衝突的事件!高雄兩名中年男子搭乘捷運,看到23歲李姓男子坐在博愛座上,沒有讓座,不僅大聲斥責,還拉李姓男子的頭撞擊窗戶,但事發第一時間警方卻說是李姓男子情緒失控,在車廂內大吼大叫才被通報,結果同車乘客PO出事發當時的影片,打臉警察,警方事後才通知兩名中年男子到案,並依強制罪嫌將他們移送。

第一時間誤當失控通報 影片曝光打臉警​

民眾用手機拍下畫面,兩名中年男子在捷運上對著一名年輕人攻擊,扯頭撞窗戶,還猛K對方的頭部,同車乘客看不下去,上前阻止,兩名中年男子才乖乖停手,但仍持續飆罵三字經,遭年輕人反擊。
廣告
廣告
到底雙方為何要在捷運上大打出手?還原整起事件,事發在28號下午2點多,當時李姓男子坐在博愛座,因為腳跨占另一座位,又未讓座,引發兩名中年男子不滿,大聲斥責,雙方爆衝突。
明明是3人在高雄捷運上大亂鬥,但警方第一時間卻回覆是李男情緒失控,在列車上自言自語大聲吼叫被通報,要釐清是否涉恐嚇公眾罪,直到晚上同車乘客曝光影片,警方才著手調閱監視器去查真相,發現李男因未讓博愛座,與兩名中年男子起衝突,案情才逆轉,趕緊通知涉案的兩名中年男子到案說明。

警事後通知2中年男子到案 依強制罪移送​

高雄捷運警察隊隊長杜嘉鴻表示,傷害罪的部分,三人經訊問之後,均暫不提出告訴,蔡男跟張男有壓制的部分,本隊訊問之後依強制罪嫌,移請地檢署偵辦。
廣告
廣告
民眾認為,「博愛座不一定老人坐,需要的人都可坐,互相溝通、商量,問一下就好,幹嘛要打人呢」。
博愛座存廢爭議不斷,如今高捷又爆發未讓座肢體衝突,再度引發社會關注。
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
My solution is the best. Put all the old farts in one cabin. Free all other seats in the rest of the train.

No more 博愛座,change to 等死廂 or 流動墳場.
 
Last edited:

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
My solution is the best. Put also the old farts in one cabin. Free all other seats in the rest of the train.

No more 博愛座,change to 等死廂 or 流動墳場.
They got ladies only cabin in some places. But that did not deter men from using it.
 
Top