• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo.

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years, Scientist Says
by Brian Merchant, Brooklyn, New York on 06.30.10

blimp-airplanes-carbon.jpg


The Gaurdian reports - that the UK's "former chief scientific adviser, Professor Sir David King ... told a conference that massive helium balloons - or blimps - would replace aircraft as a key part of the global trade network as a way of cutting global warming emissions."

And this is no flight of fancy.

The US Department of Defense has already made large grants to prominent aviation companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin to pursue exactly that goal; namely, a fleet of blimps that could make air freight cheaper and less polluting.

King says that "as a result, the helium-powered ships could be carrying freight - and even passengers - in as little as a decade's time."

These "airships" would be slower than conventional airplanes, but could carry much more cargo: "With a speed of 125kph (78mph), and much lower fuel costs, plus a carrying capacity potentially many times that of a standard Boeing 747 plane, blimps could in future carry much of current air freight."

And some developers say that transporting goods by blimp can slash carbon emissions by as much as 90% in many cases.

As for human airship travel, less is certain. The focus is currently on gearing up blimps to takeover much of the air freight business. There's ample room for an airship travel market -- it's been long enough since the Hindenburg, right? Plenty of environmentally conscious consumers would find the prospect alluring -- and so would thrifty ones, considering blimp travel would presumably be cheaper than jet fuel-reliant airplane travel.

The role of airplanes have long been a tough piece to fit into the puzzle of transitioning to a low-carbon future -- the huge amounts of jet fuel they burn make them some of the most notorious emitters on the planet. But, industrialized societies have also grown accustomed to the convenience of air travel, and many rely as well upon air freight. So how to reconcile a heavily polluting staple of modern human and goods transportation with a need to reel in emissions? Simple, one scientist says: Trade them in for helium-powered blimps.
.
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

Aeroscraft — Rebirth of The Blimp

aeroships.jpg


If you liked our posts on the Magenn (a, b, and c), you might fancy this too. One of the many pitches used by Californian based Aeros, to sell their modern rendering of the blimp is to dub it ‘The Ecological Aircraft’. They go on to suggest it is “the first manned aircraft of its kind to be propelled by electric motors. This prop-motor combination allows for operations in ultra-low noise emission. This capability, together with the aircraft's inherent ability to stay airborne almost independent of power settings - not available in any other classes of aircraft - will allow [it] to operate in the most ecologically sensitive areas.” And then this; “They are energy efficient, expending fuel only to propel the airship, due to their inherent floating ability.” Compared to a passenger jet of similar carrying capacity it should require only half the fuel to operate. Plans are afoot to build 150-180 passenger cruisers for luxury travel, as well as city-to-city travel (LAX to JFK in 18 hours - although because the Aeroscraft can take off and land vertically, standard runways and infrastructure are not required.) Plus there are freight models too.

“The idea is for the Aeroscraft to take 20 truckloads of goods straight from a factory in Japan to a warehouse in California in a day and a half, bypassing crowded ports and clogged rail lines.”

A prototype Aeroscraft is, if I read correctly, being built at the moment, as proof of concept and is due to grace the airways in 2010, filled with its 14 million cubic feet of helium. Now that’s thinking big.
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

Speed too slow and if have turbulance sure go down and also will be very have to navigate if wind speed more than 50km/h.
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

Middle East is a non flight zone lor like that......
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

so now it will take 1 month to fly from Singapore to New York?

Cool..while they are at it, they could outfit the blimp with suites and you have bonk the stewardess while you are drifting across Atlantic Ocean..how cool is that?
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

Each blimp can carry how many tonnage of cargo??
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

Short distance point to point lift is ok. But when you add distance that thing is too clumsy and can easily affected by wind given the aerodynamics after all it is a blimp.
 
Re: Blimps Could Replace Airplanes in 10 Years - Interesting alternative to sea cargo

wahlaneh...
our chinnook helicopter can carry artillery gun also mah.
copy our design one.
 
Back
Top