Big Balls Theorem - The Pastor Ronny Case

[mscitw]

Big Balls Theorem can be applied in simple game theory problem.

Big Balls Theorems states if two opposing groups collide, the group with the bigger balls win.

Case 1:
Ronny Tan, big balls given that 20,000 stupid peasants donate 100 peanuts each monthly, that gives him 2000,000 peanuts a month, that ought to swell his peanuts. The only Buddhist lodge that could challenge him is the famous Waterloo Street Kuan Yin Temple but those folks are not interested in hawking paradise. Ronny decided to poke fun of the infidels and got a surprise in the Big Balls Theorem.

The Big Balls Theorem merely states the winner in a confrontation, Big Balls Theorem says nothing about the participants.

The regime is watching Ronny carefully because if stupid peasants accuse regime of watching out for moslems, that create tensions and that is not good in an election year. It is better to stay impartial so that stupid peasants will not go to riot and drive away investment dollars.

Now its Ronny vs Regime and by the Big Balls Theorem, we know the regime will triumph.

I hope this write up will clarify doubts about the Big Balls Theorem.

 

[mscitw]

The Big Balls Theorem could be applied with limited success to predict if two loser groups are given a beating, who will get a bigger dose. BBT states the losers with smaller balls will get a worse beating.

In Feburary, a wealthy pastor tending to a flock was found making stupid comments about taoists and buddhists in a web media posting. Three boys of humbler background were posting stupid comments in facebook about indians. BBT states the three boys will get into bigger problems with the regime. My nephew could tell that boys will smaller balls will lose when compared against ronny's adult balls.

Big Balls Theorem was initially spot on, the boys were detained and threatened with venom from the tough seditious act. Ronny only got a free tea treat from the Secret Police, took down his web videos and apologies for the bad experience. The three stupid peasant boys could not even retract their facebook posts and could be charged!!!

In the realm of pure mathematics, theoretically modelling can only get you so far, practical considerations will influence final results. While Big Balls Theorem was spot on regarding Ronny's lax response, Big Balls Theorem could not explained why the three boys were not formally charged subsequently.

The regime got themselves into a legal knot, lets say the three boys called Indians Nehs or Gelengkia, this is just an academic example, could the seditious act be enforced without a reasonable man tearing his hair?? Mao would have certainly love to hit the three with a gulag term, Pol Pot will simply send them to the country side for 'processing' and Hitler will obviously gas the three peasant boys.

Perhaps if the yanks start calling chinese chink, is that seditious? (stupid question)

Suppose the regime came up with a valid legal case to enforce seditious act for using unsuitable names to label indians, they had to justify Ronny's free tea treat.

The three boys had facebook and all baboons in the world know Facebook is a nice platform for social networking with more dangerous swines e.g. pedophiles, Nazis and terror groups running amok. Ronny had access to 20,000 live peasants and lets assume 30% buy his ideas and start applying Ronny's ideas to their everyday life ........Ronny has the potential to wreck more havoc on young minds thanks to his half baked understanding of comparative religions than the school boy taunts of three immature baboons who have problems calling indians indians.

I hope this shed more light on the limitations of Big Balls Theorem. All examples are quoted as an academic exercise, while other examples could be used, above examples are used to drive a point and writers have no problems with indians at any point in time.

 

[myo539]

Big Balls or Small Balls, who cares???

When you see every single human soul queuing up for TOTO Chinese New Year 15 million dollars Mega draws - regardless of religion or race (except age - underage - lah) , they are all equals. Equal chance for a ticket to heaven on Earth! A chance to even get out of this little red dot paradise to another paradise.

Who cares about balls??? Balls!

Effective punishments? Just rotan the three boys. Rony Tan's retraction is more than enough. Bloodied backside can hide. Lack of face cannot hide.

 

[mscitw]

The Big Balls Theorem is closely related to the 'One Country, Three Systems' Theorem.

The traffic poodles are quick to fine and imprison traffic offenders except for the rich e.g. Ah Siah Regan Lee, Romanian Sibelan, highly placed civil servants.

Only in peasantpore!

 

[bryanlim1972]

The Big Balls Theorem is closely related to the 'One Country, Three Systems' Theorem.

The traffic poodles are quick to fine and imprison traffic offenders except for the rich e.g. Ah Siah Regan Lee, Romanian Sibelan, highly placed civil servants.

Only in peasantpore!

but in singapore, everyone has the opportunity to grow big balls.