• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Bias in S'pore justice system?

CENWEN

Alfrescian
Loyal

Bias in S'pore justice system?

A high-stakes legal battle between the Singapore govt. and the Wall Street Journal has begun.

Singapore says WSJ wages two-decade attack on judges.

<cite class="auth">Reuters - 1 hour 46 minutes ago

</cite>SINGAPORE, Nov 4 - Singapore's attorney general accused the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday of waging a two-decade campaign to besmirch the Singapore judiciary, at the start of a contempt of court case brought against the newspaper.

<script language="javascript">if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['NQJAVHxseNI-']='&U=13fj4teju%2fN%3dNQJAVHxseNI-%2fC%3d629078.12732857.13035082.3272417%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5378559%2fV%3d1'; </script><noscript>
b
</noscript>Singapore's attorney general is seeking contempt proceedings against the publisher of the Asian edition of the Wall Street Journal, News Corp's <nwsa.n> Dow Jones & Co, and two of the newspaper's editors, Daniel Hertzberg and Christine Glancey. "Freedom of speech in Singapore allows a person to criticise government policy and the decisions of the courts. There is no fetter on public debate about policy," said Walter Woon, Singapore's attorney general, in court. "When discussion of a court's judgements becomes an attack on a judge or the judiciary, then the law of contempt of court steps in," Woon said. Woon said he was looking for a "substantial fine" to be imposed on Dow Jones, but was not looking to financially cripple the company. The case is the latest in a string of legal actions brought by the Southeast Asian country against foreign news organisations. The attorney general's office has said two editorials published in the Asian Wall Street Journal, entitled "Democracy in Singapore" and "Judging Singapore's Judiciary," allege that the judiciary is "not independent" and "is biased and lacks integrity".

The lawyer representing Dow Jones Publishing Co Inc, Philip Jeyaretnam, said the two editorials were opinion pieces, with a smart and informal tone that should not be read as sarcastic or disrespectful. "Newspapers don't conduct 25-year campaigns, and the Wall Street Journal is certainly not part of any campaign," said Jeyaretnam, in his opening remarks to the court. Jeyaretnam, a former president of Singapore's Law Society and the son of the late Singapore opposition leader J.B. Jeyaretnam, said the defense of fair criticism should apply and the publication had shown no malice. "The readership of the Wall Street Journal Asia is a discerning one ... It expects to hear different sides of any debate and to make up its own mind," he said. Singapore leaders have won damages in the past from foreign media groups when they report on local politics, including the Economist, the International Herald Tribune and Bloomberg News. (Reporting by Melanie Lee; Writing by Neil Chatterjee; Editing by Bill Tarrant)</nwsa.n>
 
Top