Bias in S'pore justice system?
A high-stakes legal battle between the Singapore govt. and the Wall Street Journal has begun.
Singapore says WSJ wages two-decade attack on judges.
<cite class="auth">Reuters - 1 hour 46 minutes ago
</cite>SINGAPORE, Nov 4 - Singapore's attorney general accused the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday of waging a two-decade campaign to besmirch the Singapore judiciary, at the start of a contempt of court case brought against the newspaper.
<script language="javascript">if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['NQJAVHxseNI-']='&U=13fj4teju%2fN%3dNQJAVHxseNI-%2fC%3d629078.12732857.13035082.3272417%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5378559%2fV%3d1'; </script><noscript>
The lawyer representing Dow Jones Publishing Co Inc, Philip Jeyaretnam, said the two editorials were opinion pieces, with a smart and informal tone that should not be read as sarcastic or disrespectful. "Newspapers don't conduct 25-year campaigns, and the Wall Street Journal is certainly not part of any campaign," said Jeyaretnam, in his opening remarks to the court. Jeyaretnam, a former president of Singapore's Law Society and the son of the late Singapore opposition leader J.B. Jeyaretnam, said the defense of fair criticism should apply and the publication had shown no malice. "The readership of the Wall Street Journal Asia is a discerning one ... It expects to hear different sides of any debate and to make up its own mind," he said. Singapore leaders have won damages in the past from foreign media groups when they report on local politics, including the Economist, the International Herald Tribune and Bloomberg News. (Reporting by Melanie Lee; Writing by Neil Chatterjee; Editing by Bill Tarrant)</nwsa.n>