• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Attempted Lie by 154th on Al Jazeera

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>31819.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>Another glaring mistake by ST: M1 did not ink any deal with Al-Jazeera

PostDateIcon.png
April 15th, 2010 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Site Admin

Written by Our Correspondent
Acting Minister for Information, Communication and the Arts Lui Tuck Yew once praised the Singapore media as a “trustworthy” source of news. It appears that he may need to re-assess his judgement soon following a series of glaring mistakes made by the Straits Times which is seriously becoming a source of “misinformation” rather than factual news.
Coming right after a series of juvenile errors such as mistaking the capital of Hungary for Romania’s and misquoting Foreign Minister George Yeo last week, the Straits Times now come up with something out of thin air to mislead and deceive Singaporeans.
SingTel’s decision to drop Al-Jazeera TV channel from its MIO TV sparked a controversy lately with many Singaporeans lampooning the PAP government of exerting pressure on SingTel to do so following the latest video by Al-Jazeera on homeless Singaporeans which greatly embarrassed the PAP.
Mr Lui was forced to issue a clarification that Al-Jazeera was dropped due to “commercial” reasons without substantiating his claims.
In its eagerness to limit the damage from the fallout, the Straits Times claimed that M1 had inked a deal with Al-Jazeera to give the public the impression that the channel was not banned from Singapore by the PAP:
staljazeera.jpg

[Source: Straits Timess, 14 April 2010]
It is not known where the ST journalist Tan Wei Zhen got the information from.
M1 subsequently clarified in a statement a day later that contrary to what was reported in the Straits Times, it had never inked any deal with Al-Jazeera:
mypaperaljazeera.jpg

[Source: My Paper, 15 April 2010]
Did the journalist check with M1 before writing the article? Shouldn’t the facts be double-checked first before publication? Can we still trust what is reported in the Straits Times?
At the end of the day, Al-Jazeera will not be shown on either SingTel or M1 channels after all which is hardly surprising since its coverage of Singapore current affairs are rather critical of the government at times.
It is a shame that in today’s internet age, the PAP still see the need of censoring negative news about its performance which is not reflective of a steady, assured and confident government demanding to be paid the highest salaries in the world.

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
In the old days you would see white lies printed in ST. Nowadays its common to see deliberate lies. ST(aka gov't) must be slipping or they've become too arrogant :rolleyes:

Though I'm surprise to see another gov't controlled paper criticise ST :eek:
 
In the old days you would see white lies printed in ST. Nowadays its common to see deliberate lies. ST(aka gov't) must be slipping or they've become too arrogant :rolleyes:

Though I'm surprise to see another gov't controlled paper criticise ST :eek:


With the old guards retiring and the younger ones taking over the helm. Perspective and arrogance does prevail within the younger generation in their approach in journalism.

They may have adopted a more laidback approach and does not vet thru the authenticities of their sources. As one forumer mention years back in the old forum, journalist in Singapore should be called pseudo reporters. Whatever they report are always dictated by higher authourity and not by their investigative journalist skills; or the lack of it.
 
If they had any integrity they wouldn't have been hired! True journalists have strong integrity as it is a required foundation for their occupation. The 154th is nothing more than a propaganda machine.:oIo:
 
M1 singtel, starhub, hdb, cpf, ira , ST, high court or whatever all belongs to the company whether u like it or not...they have agents everywhere just to keep the people in line.....u cant stop the company they only way is to bring it down...and its very highly almost an impossible mission....
 
Back
Top