• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

AMDK refused to wear a mask on MRT and useless Sinkies can't do shit to him and can even engaged in a banter with him

It's a personal choice whether a person wants to wear a mask or not. Let the enforcement people do their jobs, no need to be a kaypoh social media vigilante.
 
I'll just leave him alone n let him be. Let the police handle him in case he turned violent!
 
Last edited:
The Ang Moh is smart enough to know that masks actually make things worse so he's doing his best to limit the spread of Covid by not wearing one.
 
It's a personal choice whether a person wants to wear a mask or not. Let the enforcement people do their jobs, no need to be a kaypoh social media vigilante.

People like u are the reason why Sinkies are often regarded as pussies.:FU:
 
Singapore is ranked the best place in the world for expats.....
 
When ang mor see useless walkovers like laksaboy, they are encouraged to treat us like pussies. So don’t blame the ang mors!
 
we need general ng to lecture him
sinkies are just like tufu useless bumps
cant even handle such a soft tissue
needs gen ng's toughness and robustness
 
Police arrest man seen in video refusing to wear mask on MRT train
Published MAY 09, 2021
Keefe Chan/Facebook

1620546621610.png

A video circulating on social media shows the man without a mask on a train on the East-West Line.

SINGAPORE — A man was arrested on Sunday (May 9) for allegedly causing a public nuisance and flouting safe distancing rules after refusing to wear a mask on an MRT train.

A video circulating on social media shows the man without a mask on a train on the East-West Line. Throughout the almost two-minute video, he could be heard telling another commuter why he did not want to wear a mask.

In response to queries from CNA, the police confirmed that a report was lodged and investigations were ongoing.

"The police arrested a 39-year-old man for allegedly causing public nuisance and flouting safe distancing measures in relation to the case," they said.

In the video, after other commuters appeared to have urged the man to put on a mask, he replied: "Just wear your mask, it's fine. I will never wear a mask."

The man then sat between two commuters, prompting a woman on his right to quickly vacate her seat.

READ ALSO
Covid-19: ‘Sovereign’ woman who refused to wear mask at Shunfu Mart gets 2 weeks’ jail, S$2,000 fine
"I'm very religious and I love human beings," the man said. "And I hate seeing uncles, granddads with the mask on."

As the man went on a spiel about researching the issue of masks, the commuter on his left got up, too. He appeared to tell fellow commuters not to engage the maskless man.

"(You're) just giving him attention," the commuter said.

Just past the one-minute mark of the video, another commuter offered the man a mask.

The man looked disgusted. "I'm not going to put that on my face," he said, using an expletive. The mask was left on the seat.

CNA has contacted SMRT for comment.

A woman who was caught on video refusing to wear a mask at Shunfu Mart last year was on Friday jailed for two weeks and fined S$2,000. Paramjeet Kaur, 41, had claimed to be a "sovereign" who was above the law.

Those convicted of not wearing a mask in public can be jailed for up to six months, fined up to S$10,000 or both.

The police said people should take the safe distancing measures seriously.

"The police will not tolerate such blatant disregard of the law and wilful breaches of safe distancing measures," they said. CNA
 
2 weeks' jail and $2,000 fine

'Sovereign' woman pleads guilty to breaching Covid-19 rules, gets two weeks' jail and fine
Paramjeet Kaur faced seven charges, four of which were for breaching Covid-19 regulations.

Paramjeet Kaur faced seven charges, four of which were for breaching Covid-19 regulations.PHOTOS: WONG KWAI CHOW, AH XIONG/YOUTUBE
dominiclow.png

Dominic Low


MAY 7, 2021



SINGAPORE - The woman who claimed she was a "sovereign" when told to wear a mask in public was sentenced to two weeks’ jail and a $2,000 fine on Friday (May 7).
Paramjeet Kaur, 41, pleaded guilty to one charge each for failing to wear a mask over her nose and mouth while she was outside her residence, and for public nuisance.
Five other charges were taken into consideration by District Judge Ronald Gwee during sentencing. Three of these were for breaching Covid-19 regulations. The other two were for failing to report her change of home address and for refusing to sign her statement at a police station.
The judge backdated Kaur’s jail term to May 5 last year, when she was remanded in the Institute of Mental Health for two weeks.
Kaur made headlines in May last year after she was caught on video not wearing a mask and engaging in a heated argument with passers-by at Shunfu Mart near Upper Thomson Road.
In the video clip, which went viral, she claimed that she was "sovereign".



"It means I have nothing to do with the police, it means I have no contract with the police. They have no say over me," she is heard saying.
A man, who is off-screen, responds: "This doesn't even make any sense. If you're a person in Singapore, you have to follow the rules of Singapore."
But the woman replies: "That's the thing - I'm not a person, I'm 'we the people'."
The court heard that Kaur went to Shunfu Mart & Hawker Centre to buy groceries on May 3 last year.

When another woman confronted her for not wearing a mask, she retorted that she need not do so as she was not sick.
An argument then erupted between the two women, with multiple individuals gathering at the scene.
“The witnesses saw that the accused was not wearing a mask, shouting loudly and behaving in a defiant manner,” said Deputy Public Prosecutor V. Jesudevan.
Kaur also began filming the people present with her mobile phone, and refused to don a mask when offered one.
She was arrested the next day, and was charged on May 5.
In May last year, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said in a Facebook post that he had "checked up" what Kaur might have meant by claiming to be "sovereign".
He said: "There is a movement in the United States, and adherents to that movement, (broadly speaking) reject government, reject the police and any kind of authority... Such people should not live within society - she should not expect any of the benefits that come from this system of governance, including her security, medical care, other benefits."
On Friday, Kaur’s lawyers. Kertar Singh and Mohamed Arshad, said that their client thought that wearing a mask would hinder her ability to breathe normally or comfortably.
She was also under the impression at that time that she did not need to wear a mask as she was not sick, they added.
For failing to wear a mask over the nose and mouth, a first-time offender can be jailed for up to six months, or fined up to $10,000, or both.
Repeat offenders can be jailed for up to a year, or fined up to $20,000, or both.
 
Who among us likes to wear masks? But since it is required by law, we have no choice. Why give the authorities a reason to arrest, fine or imprison you? These foreigners are fucking idiots, I tell ya!
 
Who among us likes to wear masks? But since it is required by law, we have no choice. Why give the authorities a reason to arrest, fine or imprison you? These foreigners are fucking idiots, I tell ya!
He probably wanted to be send home at taxpayer expenses. I also hope that he is not just being fined, but banned from entering Singapore forever. He is the cause of covit-19 spread and gave PAP the ammunition to blame Sinkies instead.

Lawrence Wong and LHL should stop blaming Sinkies and take a hard look on the video.
 
2 weeks' jail and $2,000 fine

'Sovereign' woman pleads guilty to breaching Covid-19 rules, gets two weeks' jail and fine
Paramjeet Kaur faced seven charges, four of which were for breaching Covid-19 regulations.

Paramjeet Kaur faced seven charges, four of which were for breaching Covid-19 regulations.PHOTOS: WONG KWAI CHOW, AH XIONG/YOUTUBE
dominiclow.png

Dominic Low


MAY 7, 2021



SINGAPORE - The woman who claimed she was a "sovereign" when told to wear a mask in public was sentenced to two weeks’ jail and a $2,000 fine on Friday (May 7).
Paramjeet Kaur, 41, pleaded guilty to one charge each for failing to wear a mask over her nose and mouth while she was outside her residence, and for public nuisance.
Five other charges were taken into consideration by District Judge Ronald Gwee during sentencing. Three of these were for breaching Covid-19 regulations. The other two were for failing to report her change of home address and for refusing to sign her statement at a police station.
The judge backdated Kaur’s jail term to May 5 last year, when she was remanded in the Institute of Mental Health for two weeks.
Kaur made headlines in May last year after she was caught on video not wearing a mask and engaging in a heated argument with passers-by at Shunfu Mart near Upper Thomson Road.
In the video clip, which went viral, she claimed that she was "sovereign".



"It means I have nothing to do with the police, it means I have no contract with the police. They have no say over me," she is heard saying.
A man, who is off-screen, responds: "This doesn't even make any sense. If you're a person in Singapore, you have to follow the rules of Singapore."
But the woman replies: "That's the thing - I'm not a person, I'm 'we the people'."
The court heard that Kaur went to Shunfu Mart & Hawker Centre to buy groceries on May 3 last year.

When another woman confronted her for not wearing a mask, she retorted that she need not do so as she was not sick.
An argument then erupted between the two women, with multiple individuals gathering at the scene.
“The witnesses saw that the accused was not wearing a mask, shouting loudly and behaving in a defiant manner,” said Deputy Public Prosecutor V. Jesudevan.
Kaur also began filming the people present with her mobile phone, and refused to don a mask when offered one.
She was arrested the next day, and was charged on May 5.
In May last year, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said in a Facebook post that he had "checked up" what Kaur might have meant by claiming to be "sovereign".
He said: "There is a movement in the United States, and adherents to that movement, (broadly speaking) reject government, reject the police and any kind of authority... Such people should not live within society - she should not expect any of the benefits that come from this system of governance, including her security, medical care, other benefits."
On Friday, Kaur’s lawyers. Kertar Singh and Mohamed Arshad, said that their client thought that wearing a mask would hinder her ability to breathe normally or comfortably.
She was also under the impression at that time that she did not need to wear a mask as she was not sick, they added.
For failing to wear a mask over the nose and mouth, a first-time offender can be jailed for up to six months, or fined up to $10,000, or both.
Repeat offenders can be jailed for up to a year, or fined up to $20,000, or both.

Send this bitch to me. I will twist her nipples and squeeZe out all her milk.
 
There could be a motive for him doing this now? If previously he had not been wearing a mask, he would have been dealt with by now by the authorities.
 
Back
Top