• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

All In The Familee

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
Mar 25, 2010

IHT apology over article

<!-- by line -->By Zakir Hussain
<!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar -->
front-zapm25.st.jpg
The International Herald Tribune (IHT) has apologised to three Singapore leaders for an article which implied that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong got his job on account of his father, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew. -- ST PHOTO: EDWIN KHOO

<!-- story content : start -->
THE International Herald Tribune (IHT) has apologised to three Singapore leaders for an article which implied that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong got his job on account of his father, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.
The newspaper yesterday published an apology to PM Lee, MM Lee and Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, who was prime minister from 1990 to 2004. The apology ran online and in its op-ed pages.
The publisher, editor and author of the article have also agreed to pay damages of $60,000 to PM Lee, and $50,000 each to SM Goh and MM Lee, as well as legal costs, said Senior Counsel Davinder Singh of Drew and Napier, who represented the leaders.
The libellous article was published online and in the paper on Feb 15 and Feb 16 this year.
Titled All In The Family, it was written by IHT op-ed page contributor Philip Bowring, a Hong Kong-based journalist and former editor of the Far Eastern Economic Review.
He said that 'dynastic politics thrives across Asia', and that the list of countries with governments headed by the offspring or spouses of former leaders was striking. He cited, among others, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, India, Japan and Singapore, and noted that 'Singapore's Lee Hsien Loong is Lee Kuan Yew's son'.
Read the full story in Thursday's edition of The Straits Times.
<!-- story content : end -->
c.gif
 
http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2359&Itemid=181
<TABLE class=contentpaneopen><TBODY><TR><TD class=contentheading width="100%">Singapore's Lees Cow the International Herald Tribune Again </TD><TD class=buttonheading width="100%" align=right> </TD><TD class=buttonheading width="100%" align=right> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>











<TABLE class=contentpaneopen><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="70%" colSpan=2 align=left>Written by John Berthelsen </TD></TR><TR><TD class=createdate vAlign=top colSpan=2>Wednesday, 24 March 2010 </TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top colSpan=2>
singa-kangaroocourt-lky1.jpg
Paper apologizes for a story that does not appear to include libel

In an unusual statement, the International Herald Tribune on March 24 apologized to Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, his father Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong for a February 15 article by contributor Philip Bowring on dynastic politics in Asia.

Although the article contains an analysis of dynastic politics in Asia, nowhere does it say or imply that nepotism played a role in the Lee family's – or any other family's -- political prominence in the region. In that way, the case is reminiscent of another in which the Financial Times apologized for a September 2007 article in which there appeared to be no libel. The article merely listed the names of Lee family members in high positions in the island nation.

Philip McClennan, the newly installed chief editor of the IHT for Asia, said the Hong Kong office was not empowered to talk about the letter and referred requests to Robert Christie at the New York office of the New York Times, which owns the International Herald Tribune. Bowring, who is also a contributing editor and founder of Asia Sentinel, said he could not comment on the case.

However, Reuters reported that the paper paid S$160,000 (US$114,000) in damages. Davinder Singh, the lawyer acting for the Lees, told Reuters that the IHT's publisher, editor of global editions, and Bowring also agreed to pay damages of S$60,000 to Lee Hsien Loong, and S$50,000 each to Goh Chok Tong and Lee Kuan Yew, as well as pay their legal costs.

In the apology, the paper said that in 1994 Bowring "agreed as part of an undertaking with the leaders of the government of Singapore that he would not say or imply that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had attained his position through nepotism practiced by his father, Lee Kuan Yew."

In the 1994 case, the IHT hastily agreed to apologize to the Lee family for Bowring's article even before they filed a lawsuit, laying the paper open to legal action on the basis that it had already admitted wrongdoing. Eventually the paper was forced to pay the equivalent of US$678,000, the largest amount of damages Singapore had ever levied on a publication.

Although neither Bowring nor the newspaper would comment on the case, it is possible to speculate that the Lee family demanded that the language over the 1994 case be included in the apology or that the paper risked more expensive legal action.

The IHT was also sued in 1995 over an article by an Australian academic, Christopher Lingle, and ordered to pay costs and fines over an article on "intolerant regimes" in Asia that use "a compliant judiciary" to bankrupt opposition politicians. Singapore was not mentioned in the article. Nonetheless, Justice Goh Joon Seng said he had "no doubt" that the American was referring to Singapore in his passage about a compliant judiciary and that the reference had "scandalized the Singapore judiciary" despite the fact that the Lees had repeatedly used their courts to bankrupt opposition politicians.

Being charged in the Singapore courts is tantamount to being convicted. As far as can be determined, neither the government nor the Lee family have never lost a case against the press in their own courts, nor does it appear that they have ever won one outside of Singapore. The government or members of the Lee family have filed defamation or contempt charges against virtually every major publication in Asia, including the Financial Times, Time Magazine, the Economist, Bloomberg News Service, the now-defunct AsiaWeek and any other publication that refuses to toe the Lee line although none of the cases have been filed in countries with rational legal systems.

The Far Eastern Economic Review, especially under the late editor Derek Davies, was a particular target going back to 1988. Dow Jones Corporation, the later owner of the magazine, which ceased publication in December, paid US$175,000 in damages and costs on a ruling that the magazine defamed Prime Minister Lee and his father in a 2006 interview with Chee Soon Juan, the secretary-general of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party.

In agreeing to the settlement rather than continue to fight the case, Dow Jones issued the following statement:

"Dow Jones strongly disagrees with the decision of the Singapore Court of Appeal upholding the ruling against the Far Eastern Economic Review in the defamation case brought by Lee Hsien Loong and Lee Kuan Yew. The Court casts significant doubt as to whether Singapore will ever recognize the fair and honest reporting privilege accorded to responsible journalism — a privilege available in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth countries with diverse histories and cultures.

Other fines paid by international news media include the Economist, which was ordered to pay US227,000 in one case and US$125,000 in another. Bloomberg was ordered to pay the Lees US$550,000 in 2002. In several other cases, the damage settlements were not revealed.

In the statement on the IHT's March 24 editorial page, the newspaper said that despite Bowring's promise not to imply nepotism had played a role in the younger Lee's ascent to power, "Mr Bowring nonetheless included these two men in a list of Asian political dynasties, which may have been understood by readers to infer that the younger Lee did not achieve his position through merit.

"We wish to state clearly that this inference was not intended. We apologize to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew and former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong for any distress or embarrassment caused by any breach of the undertaking and the article."

The offending article was taken off the International Herald Tribune's website. However, it has been reprinted by many other publications which subscribe to the New York Times news services. Asia Sentinel reprints the IHT piece here for readers to judge:

All in the Family

By PHILIP BOWRING

HONG KONG — Are political dynasties good or bad?

Election time in the Philippines is a regular reminder of the roles that feudal instincts and the family name play in that nation's politics. Benigno Aquino, son of the late President Corazon Aquino, is the front runner to succeed President Gloria Arroyo, daughter of Diosdado Macapagal, a president in the 1960s.

Senate and Congressional contests will see family names of other former presidents and those long prominent in provincial politics and land-owning.

But the Philippines is not unique. Dynastic politics thrives across Asia to an extent found in no other region apart from the Arabian peninsula monarchies.




</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
The list of Asian countries with governments headed by the offspring or spouses of former leaders is striking: Pakistan has Prime Minister Asif Ali Zardari, widower of Benazir Bhutto, herself the daughter of the executed former leader Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Bangladesh has Sheikh Hasina, daughter of the murdered first prime minister, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman . In Malaysia, Prime Minister Najib Razak is the son of the second prime minister, Abdul Razak. Singapore's Lee Hsien Loong is Lee Kuan Yew's son. In North Korea, Kim Il-sung's son Kim Jong-il commands party, army and country and waiting in the wings is his son Kim Jong-un.

In India, the widow Sonia Gandhi is the power behind the technocrat prime minister, Manmohan Singh, and her son Rahul is showing political promise and being groomed in the hope of leading the Congress party and eventually filling the post of prime minister, first occupied by his great grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru.

In Japan, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama is the scion of a Kennedy-like political dynasty: His father was a foreign minister, and his grandfather was a prime minister.

Indonesia's last president, Megawati Sukarnoputri, is the daughter of its first, and family ties could well play in the next presidential election when the incumbent, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, must retire. In Myanmar, the durability of the opposition to the military owes much to the name of Aung San Suu Kyi's independence-hero father as well as to her stoicism.

Thailand lacks obvious political dynasties but that is likely because there is already a monarch. South Korea's rough and tumble democracy would seem to leave little scope for dynasties but even there, the political career of Park Chung Hee's daughter, Park Geun Hye, has benefited much from her father's reputation.

With the exception of North Korea, Asian dynasties are a phenomenon of countries that are more or less democratic.

In China, family connections help immensely but the party is still a relatively meritocratic hierarchy. Vietnam is similar. In the Philippines, it is easy to blame dynastic tendencies for the nation's stark economic failures. But its problems go much deeper into the social structure and the way the political system entrenches a selfish elite. It is a symptom not the cause of the malaise.

In India, the Gandhi name has been an important element in ensuring that Congress remains a major national force at a time when the growth of regional, caste and language based parties have added to the problems of governing such a diverse country. In Bangladesh, years of fierce rivalry between Sheikh Hasina, daughter of one murdered president and widow of another, have been a debilitating factor in democratic politics. But their parties needed their family names to provide cohesion and without them there could have been much more overt military intervention. Ms. Megawati was a poor leader but just by being there helped the consolidation of the post-Suharto democracy.

Dynasties can be stultifying too. In Malaysia, the ruling party was once a grassroots organization where upstarts like former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad could flourish but over time it has become a self-perpetuating patronage machine. Too many of the key players are the offspring or relatives of former leaders.

There are more fundamental problems, too. Most current Asian dynasties trace themselves to the post-1945 political transformation. In that sense they have become a crutch, reflecting a failure to devise systems for the transfer of power to new names, faces and ideas.

Dynasties are a poor commentary on the depth of democracy in their countries. Without parties with a coherent organization and a set of ideas, politics becomes about personalities alone and name recognition more important than competence. Parties run by the elite offspring of past heroes easily degenerate into self-serving patronage systems.

So dynastic leadership in Asia's quasi-democracies can provide a focus for nations, a glue for parties, an identity substitute in countries that used to be run by kings and sultans. But it is more a symptom of underlying problems than an example to be followed.
 
>and noted that 'Singapore's Lee Hsien Loong is Lee Kuan Yew's son'.

So IHT issued an apology saying that?...so LHL is not LKY son? I am puzzle? I thought the entire SINgapore knows that??
 
Comments (10)
comment_add.gif

<!-- RSS Feed link below the title -->Subscribe to this comment's feed
<!-- Hide/Show input form notice -->
max.gif
Show/Hide comments
<!-- Placeholder for all comments. REQUIRED. -->fishing village??
written by islander , March 25, 2010
@Dynastic Politics

Lees did not transform a small fishing village into international fame. Singapore was already a successful trading hub long before old lee ever existed.

Even before the British took over the island, it was a trading hub and the a certain extend a 'pirate hub'. The Orang laut pirates controlled the coastal sea routes of Singapore, the Sea Dayak pirates controlled the sea routes in south china sea and Buginese pirates the open sea south of Singapore. Thousands of Pirates do not hang around a small fishing village. Get your history right and don't give a man more credit that he deserve.

Now, modern day pirates control the media, sue people and pretend to play robin hood by giving away the money to charity.


report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +4
What if IHT left Singapore?
written by Gajah , March 25, 2010
Given that Singapore is so small, shouldn't the IHT just refuse to pay and leave the Singapore market? I mean, Singapore may have more to lose by the IHT withdrawing than the other way round. It would be very ironic if Singapore, Asia's business hub, prevents access to most major foreign news sources because of its extreme anti-defamation policy! Mind you, I think the UK's anti-defamation laws are also a bit too strong. The US and Continental Europe are much more sensible about these things.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Kangaroo Court?
written by West Oz , March 25, 2010
I don't get the picture attached to this article - is it saying or implying that the Singapore Courts aren't fair???
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: -1
...
written by Abused Singaporean , March 25, 2010
Nepotism is OK so long as it can bring success to a fishing village.

Nepotism is also OK especially when your PM's son's CEO wife doesn't have to resign when billions of public funds are lost.

Nepotism is also OK if YOUR own laws say it is OK.

What is the moral of the story ?




report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +3
@WDR
written by ChangeForSingapore , March 25, 2010
The Bush line can't be considered as the younger bush did not succeed his father one-after-another due to his father's influence..

For one thing, there was a break between his and his father's rule as President. For another, he was elected. In Singapore, the Prime Minister is not elected by the people, but appointed by those already in power - the elder Lee.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0
Truth Hurts
written by outsider , March 25, 2010
Don't understand why IHT has to apologize. It is a fact, a well know fact. All Singaporean (and many others) know it. Just that people are too afraid to say it and have no deep pocket to pay the LEEs. IHT is a reputable publication and should not be cowed by anyone, including the emperor! Very disappointing.

Truth has to be told, though it hurts
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +2
Dynastic Politics
written by WDR , March 25, 2010
Pardon my poor understanding of the term "Dynastic Politics" but didn't 2 generations of Bushes stay in the White House? Now is that considered dynastic?

I don't see why Americans allowed the small Bush to manage a major superpower except that he carried the name of the big bush? Or Americans just love war-mongers?

Difference between the Lees and Bushes. Lees brought a small fishing village to international fame. Bushes brought a major superpower to the toes of the Chinese.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: -1
Facts Speak
written by Bobby Sim , March 24, 2010
"nepotism and cronyism" ?????

We have the good life relative to all the rest around us.

We have eyes to see and SEEING is believing.

Surely nepotism and cronyism can't deliver near paradise in resourceless Singapore on this cruel earth over the last century.

Think abt it . . . .
cheesy.gif

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: -4
...
written by GMG , March 24, 2010
Compare and contrast the IHTs craven capitulation to the protestations of a self-perpetuating cabal ruling a tiny and insignificant trading post/ATM in Southeast Asia, and Google’s confused but essentially principled stand against China’s – as in ‘massive market’ to the accountants – efforts to impose censorship on its serfs. As for the substance of the charge that Lee the Younger owes his position to Lee the First. Perhaps rather than hiding behind the wigs and flummery of the courts The Family would care to subject themselves to an election that has not be preceded by the detention, financial ruin or intimidation of their opponents. Thought not.
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +9
Singapore's Lees Cow ITH
written by Thumb Logic , March 24, 2010
Nepotism is ok so long as it is kept within the immediate family. The downside is that this leads to cronyism because when you have nepotism you become paranoid and tend to asssociate with and only trust people you know or are related by blood to you. It is the responsibilty of governments to build an infrastructure that is strong enough to allow the individuals based on freedoms to work through the system to occupy the highest office in the land. The countries that have painfully gone through this process are the ones that are able to change in this fast changing world and to keep up ahead of the curve. And more importantly dominate the rest of the world that has got into the problems associated with nepotism and cronyism.

In developing countries the disparity in the quality of education given to the people itself is selfserving and works to support nepotism and cronyism. If you do not have access to quality education as the 1% percent of the population in developing countries have how on earth are you going to work through the system to reach the highest office in the land. To my mind I see a corelation between the poor education dished out to the masses in the developing countries while the children of the top 1% of the population have access to quality education overseas. If this continues then even the masses will support nepotism because they will come to realize that they are in fact inferior to those woh have benifited form a quality education at the expense of the state.

Many governments have taken on the main stream media and have won. But now they are faced with the internet. How are you going to filter this monster? In the 50s if you did not know the 26 letters of the alphabet you were cosidered illiterate. In the 80s and 90s if you did not know how to exploit the telephone and the hand phone you were illiterate. Today those who do not know how to and cannot use the internet and think that they can holdback this tsuanmi by legisaltion are in for a rude shock
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +4
 
International Herald Tribune Apologises To Singapore Leaders
<!--By: Ramjit
-->
By Zakaria Abdul Wahab

SINGAPORE, March 25 (Bernama) - The International Herald Tribune (IHT) has apologised to Singapore leaders for a recent article that referred the city-state as one of many countries that practised "dynastic politics".

In an apology published in the IHT yesterday, the newspaper apologised to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, and former prime ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong.

IHT said in 1994, Philip Bowring, a contributor to the IHT's op-ed page, agreed as part of an undertaking with the leaders of the government of Singapore that he would not say or imply that Hsien Loong had attained his position through nepotism practised by his father Kuan Yew.

In that year, Bowring, a former editor of The Far Eastern Economic Review, made the undertaking after the Singapore leaders threatened legal action against him as a freelancer for writing a column in The Herald Tribune that also referred to "dynastic politics" in East Asian countries, including Singapore.

But in last month's Feb 15 article, IHT said Bowring nonetheless included these two men in a list of Asian political dynasties, which might have been understood by readers to infer that the younger Lee did not achieve his position through merit.

Saying that the "inference was not intended", IHT nevertheless apologised to Hsien Loong, and the former prime ministers "for any distress or embarrassment caused by any breach of the undertaking and the article".

Although the apology did not mention any financial settlement, some local media reported that the IHT would also pay a total of S$160,000 in damages to the three men - S$60,000 to Hsien Loong, and S$50,000 each to Kuan Yew and Chok Tong.

-- BERNAMA
 
<TABLE id=msgUN border=0 cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
icon.aspx
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - All In The Familee</TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"></TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>Denzuko1 <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>10:55 pm </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>makapa <NOBR></NOBR>unread</TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right>(5 of 6) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"></TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>30582.5 in reply to 30582.3 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>So is LKY saying that he cannot perform and LHL is a Bast**d?</TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"></TD><TD class=msgopt width="24%" noWrap> Options</TD><TD class=msgrde width="50%" noWrap align=middle>Reply</TD><TD class=wintiny width="25%" noWrap align=right></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgbfrbot></TD><TD colSpan=3></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Back
Top