• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Adoption By Gays Or Surrogacy By Unattractive Singles Are Anti-Zikapore Anti-PAP!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
INGAPORE - The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) laid out its policy on adoption on Wednesday (Dec 27), when it commented on a court decision on a gay Singaporean doctor's bid to adopt a child he had fathered through surrogacy in the United States.

It said its position is "informed by Singapore's public policy, which encourages parenthood within marriage".

"Planned and deliberate parenthood by singles, as evidenced through the intentional use of assisted reproduction and/or surrogacy, runs contrary to this," an MSF spokesman said in an e-mailed response to queries from The Straits Times.

According to past media reports, surrogacy is not explicitly banned here, although the Health Ministry's guidelines prohibit assisted reproduction centres from practising surrogacy.

The MSF, in comments made on the failed bid on Wednesday night, said all adoption applications are assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The factors it considers include the applicant's parenting capacity, parenting beliefs, family circumstances, support network and ability to meet the child's long-term needs.



"The best interests of the child are the primary consideration when the Guardian-in-Adoption assesses each adoption application," said the spokesman.

She explained that the director of social welfare, as the appointed Guardian-in-Adoption, opposed the Singaporean doctor's application on policy grounds.

But the Family Justice Courts make the final decision on adoption applications, taking into account various factors such as the assessment and recommendation of the director of social welfare.

"The Adoption of Children Act prohibits any payment or reward to the biological or adoptive parents for the adoption of the child, except with the sanction of the court," the spokesman added.

She also reiterated the court's stand, which is that the doctor's adoption application is a case of "intentional and deliberate parenthood by a single to conceive a child through procedures which are not allowed in Singapore".

In any case, she said, "the welfare of the child is not affected by the dismissal of the adoption application, and the child, who is a US citizen, will continue to be in his father's care".

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...-by-singles-at-odds-with-singapores-stand-msf
 
Sinkie judges really have it easy. If there is no past case, there is no case. So don’t rock the boat and be a good PAP man. That is how you pay for your fourth mortgage. :)
 
Another opportunity for fat fuck Kirsten han, gay fuck jolovan wham and their freedom to love members to stir shit.

If the ah gua doctor is not in some way linked to all these fucktards who are trying to test their luck in court and hoping to open the floodgate for other like-minded ah guas, I will wear a one size too small pink T-shirt and a pink hairband to next year's pink dot at Hong Lim.

IMG_1506.jpg
 
Sinkie judges really have it easy. If there is no past case, there is no case. So don’t rock the boat and be a good PAP man. That is how you pay for your fourth mortgage. :)
This guy is obviously trying to be funny cos he deliberately declared he's gay, live with his gay partner and wanted to adopt the child in Singapore. Like what Annunaki said, he's trying to test the system and open the floodgates.

Read the original article for more details
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...-to-adopt-child-he-fathered-through-surrogacy
 
I am actually impressed by the DJ by what she wrote in the judgement. She laid the foundation for her reasoning very carefully. I believe she will make the bench in quick time.

Any way the kid is a US citizen and PR will be extended. The irony is that this situation will not arise if the couple are lesbians. There will be no need for adoption by the biological mother.
 
You can be gay or homo or lesbo....your choice of lifestyle.

But to bring in another innocent child with no say or choice to live your lifestyle ??????
 
Back
Top