• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

About Opposition being charged by PAP

tobelightlight

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Messages
13,522
Points
113
I have spoken to a lot of people about how I feel about opposition being sued or charged in Court.

For one, I have serious problem about opposition claiming that they are being sued / charged because they are opposition.

Because they fail to address the most basic issue of whether they are guilty or not, or whether they are sued for legitimate reasons - like they truly defame the other party.

Let's just deal with criminal charges, because they are easier to see but the logic is the same for civil lawsuits.

For example, whenever an opposition is being charged for a criminal charge, I have never heard the oppies mentioning that they are innocent.

In fact, Pritam Singh has never once in public indicated that he is innocent of the recent charges concerning his misconduct in parliament.

Jeyetretnam had never indicated that he was innocent.

Charles Yeo has never indicated that he is innocent of the charges.

They just simply indicate that they are charged because they are opposition.

Even Goh Meng Seng takes pride at receiving POFMA notices instead of insisting what he says is not untrue and did not endanger society.

That led me to one conclusion, that they are not innocent of the charges, and honestly do not deserve any of my thoughts that they may be innocent, because even they have never claimed that they are innocent.

When pointed out this, they would say, nobody would believe them even if they say that they are innocent, and they would invite more legal action if they claim that they are innocent.

Personally I have never heard of any legal cause of action that anyone can take for claiming innocence (even after conviction).

For that, I have always doubted opposition, because either they are not that intelligent to understand law or they are not innocent.

Just what is so difficult to claim that you are innocent. You don't have to tell me that you are being targeted, if you are innocent, the only reason why you are being charged is that you are being targeted.

You can't tell me you are being targeted without telling me that you are innocent. If you are not innocent of the charges, then it does not really matter if you were targeted,

Raymond Ng.
 
Personally I have never heard of any legal cause of action that anyone can take for claiming innocence (even after conviction).

For that, I have always doubted opposition, because either they are not that intelligent to understand law or they are not innocent.
i think the same way too. If you are not capable of protecting yourself and stand for yourself, how are you gonna stand for the country. I believe there are lawyers in opposition party to give advise on this. no?
 
Last edited:
The PAP has made its position crystal clear.
Anyone who is a threat will be fixed up.

Fix Up.jpg
 
usually erections is also a huat period for the MIW ... then can su su the oppies for $$$ to huat big big .... no believe read the past transactions from the corks ... :roflmao:
 
Hell is waiting for him
LHL was essentially saying to S'poreans: "If you want me to look after you all well, then don't vote more Opposition to be a check and balance on me, as it will prevent me from doing my best for S'pore".

Fix Up.jpg
 
usually erections is also a huat period for the MIW ... then can su su the oppies for $$$ to huat big big .... no believe read the past transactions from the corks ... :roflmao:
During this General Erection, we must stand up for S'pore. Vote for an upright govt.
 
very true
Raymond and Iris will achieve something meaningful, I'm sure.

They are merely replicating MIW's template. When MIW used the template, people accepted it as a norm in Singapore. But when RI used it, everyone, including pro MIW resented and felt it was abnormal. That, by itself, is already meaningful. Case in point is Ben the NUS prof.

RI will continue to use the same MIW template and awaken Singaporeans to this ridiculous practice.

Raymond is the 姑蘇慕容 of Singapore.

RI
 
Being sued means not innocent?

no kpkb means u guilty?

u know what is the law for?
 
Being sued means not innocent?

no kpkb means u guilty?

u know what is the law for?
That is not what he meant. In law, there is something called adverse inference. In any criminal case, the accused has the right to silence. As much as the accused is entitled to exercise his right to silence, the Court is also entitled to draw an adverse inference from the accused's silence.

Even the guilty accused will go to the witness stand to thump his chest and protest his innocence. If you are innocent, you want to keep quiet ?
 
No doubt, Raymond and Iris are novices in this legal game. AI can offer knowledge, but not the most effective strategy to fight a case. It's just like a law professor deals with stationary target, but a litigation lawyer, moving target. AI cannot handle moving target. Even with the guidance of a professional lawyer, there will still be blind spots when you are dealing with a moving target. It's so easy to ridicule Raymond and Iris whenever they hit a wall. After all, they are not legally trained. However, Raymond and Iris possess something that is far more important than legal knowledge when fighting against tyranny - they have got balls of steel than most educated Singaporeans.

As long as the spirit remains indomitable, the requisite legal knowledge will ultimately fall in place. It's a matter of time. :thumbsup:
 
Back
Top