• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

A good article by Lucky Tan

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,489
Points
0
http://singaporemind.blogspot.com/2010/07/beyond-public-transport.html

Monday, July 05, 2010

Beyond Public Transport....

"“If you’re the best today, strive to be better. If you’re better today, strive to be ‘betterer’ and if you’re ‘betterer’ today, strive to be ‘betterest’ so that over time, Singapore’s service standards can just keep getting better, ‘betterer’ and ‘betterest’" - Minister Lim Swee Say

The PAP leaders have this habit of pointing out what they think is wrong with Singaporeans and demanding Singaporeans improve themselves. However, when Singaporeans suggest much needed improvements to our transport system, our public housing and flood control mechanisms, the first thing they do is deny there is something wrong and once the evidence become overwhelming and there is no way to deny the facts, the 2nd thing they do is blame something else (other than their policies) for the problems we face. The PAP leaders who are paid the highest salaries in the world should be the ones to do a "betterer" job....why is Minister Lim asking Singaporeans workers who endure a 3rd world wage structure (see article here ) to improve. Lim Swee Say should improve his English and stop using words like betterer. He should be calling for improvement of the transport system so that workers can get to work more comfortably to start the day fresher and more productive.

All of us should thank SMRT CEO Saw for being so honest. She admitted that her goal is not really the comfort of passengers - she is okay with the situation so long as they are not crushed. She later admitted that the trains crowded but she can't do anything about it without compromising reliability or safety. Actually, there is something else she can't compromise and that is the shareholders' profits and dividends ...of course the SMRT can extend the length of each station and expand the number of carriages for each train, of course the trains can be upgraded to increase frequency and shorten waiting times. But all that requires her to use shareholders' fund and the increase in revenue is unlikely to compensate for expediture since the demand for MRT service is fairly inelastic. Like I said, I don't blame her...she is only doing her job to take care of the interests of shareholders. There is no point trying to argue with her anyway since she has already shown all her cards and admitted that the trains are crowded. You look at the whole system, together with the COE + ERP and you realise the entire transport system will not evolve to improve the standard of living greatly in the coming years. Our COE system is an example of system that will lead to great unhappiness and dissatisfaction. This bidding scheme is one in which a scarce resource (cars) is allocated based purely on a person's ability to pay rather than his needs. A millionaire's son gets a car for partying while a lower middle income father with a handicapped child cannot afford one as he struggles with other medical costs. This system causes great mismatch between needs and allocation. You superimpose this COE system onto Singapore's income distribution which is the most unequal in the developed world and you get plenty of dissatisfaction with the system.

2 days ago, Minister Tharman talked about the govt aim to raise the median income to $3100 from $2400[Link] by 2020. To me, that is a rather meaningless goal because it may not translate to any improvement in living standards. What is the use if 5-room HDB flats go for $1M at that time, or our MRT trains reach crush point and medical costs which has been rising much faster than income continues to escalate.....The problem with Singapore has never been a lack of GDP growth. The problem is the income gap and raising median income without narrowing the income gap will solve nothing. If the income gap keeps rising, cars and better homes will just continue to move out of reach of most Singaporeans.

If you want things to improve in Singapore, there is not much point complaining or giving feedback to the PAP govt. Just like the SMRT, it must have taken thousands of complaints and plenty of feedback over the years....but is constrained by the system to operate in a certain way. Similarly, your life will not improve if the system in Singapore does not change. If you give in to Minister Lim Swee Say's demand for workers to be faster and cheaper, you will not better your life much...you will end up working faster, harder, cheap ..'betterer' for the rest of your life perhaps even not being able to retire until the day you die. The best way to improve your life is to improve the system and the way you do that is to bring in the people whose interests are aligned with yours into parliament.
 
I think mr. Tan is stating the obvious. But it is alarming for me that an economic minister can make such a simplistic comment about raising the average wage, as if that will solve everything in itself.
 
I think mr. Tan is stating the obvious. But it is alarming for me that an economic minister can make such a simplistic comment about raising the average wage, as if that will solve everything in itself.

It's either the minister is a simpleton or he think that Singaporeans are simpleton and can be fooled easily. What do you think?
 
It's either the minister is a simpleton or he think that Singaporeans are simpleton and can be fooled easily. What do you think?

Its not an either or question that u ask. I think the answer is both. The minister is a simpleton, and 66% of the people are too.
 
..............................
"“If you’re the best today, strive to be better. If you’re better today, strive to be ‘betterer’ and if you’re ‘betterer’ today, strive to be ‘betterest’ so that over time, Singapore’s service standards can just keep getting better, ‘betterer’ and ‘betterest’" - Minister Lim Swee Say


QUOTE]

The above statement is the most idiotic statement, at least to-date, by the Parliament resident clown. A primary school kid will know this is the worst England structure with incorrect terms used.
 
The above statement is the most idiotic statement, at least to-date, by the Parliament resident clown. A primary school kid will know this is the worst England structure with incorrect terms used.

he looks like the joker anyway :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Back
Top