Aye Caramba! The introduction of FTs into the country has seen great drops in productivity levels.....productivity already super low leow, we can now all kiss our economy goodbye...
From: T1,T2,T3 or Control Tower? (Conspiracy28) 2:57 am
To: ALL
22769.1
This interesting article first appeared on Temasek Review in mandarin.
I painstakingly translate for all to share.....
2009 model -where to go from here?
Is the Singapore model a clay Buddha across the river? Will the learning of the model reveals residual values?
has always been the media’s glorification of People's Action Party –the government being smart and capable. On November 30, 2008 in a report, a typical statement reads : 'China since reform, and opening up, many leaders have visited Singapore, but also draw on a number of well-established specific practices in Singapore. In recent years, quite a number of officials, academics, journalists, view the People's Action Party and Singapore's political model of great interest '. Clearly, the People's Action Party and its supporters believe the model is feasible and can be used as reference systems in other developing countries. Lee Kuan Yew in 2000, "From Third World to First World: The Story" is the account of Lee's successful experience.
However, the feasibility of the model as early as of years ago, western scholars have questioned. In 2008 Nobel Prize Winner for Economics, Krugman wrote that in 1994, an Economic Review had already rejected this so-called Asian economic miracle, and that Singapore's economic growth is due to foreign investment for growth rather than economic productivity gains. Similarly, the American political scientist Samuel Huntington has always been doubtful that 's political system can continue in the post-Lee Kuan Yew era. In fact, the government's economic policy is formulated by some to be rather than the conditions for success, so 's economic performance does not depend on to People's Action Party government policy.
What has the experience worth learning? 21 world-class networks in December 30, 2008 in an online article, "'s a good example" from a scholar's visit to National University of Singapore reported. Part of which reads: 'Singapore's impact on China ... China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park ... Singapore's sovereign investment funds and Temasek model ... For 30 years, Lee has stated ... for the Chinese Government’s sincerity and beliefs in his recommendations, ... China's most valuable is not the hardware but the software side, influenced Deng Xiaoping in this regard -, Deng Xiaoping said ‘we need to learn from , not just 's economy which is relatively developed, but also its good social order '.
The truth of the case? New is a complete failure in terms of experience. In 1994 the two sides agreed to develop the new industrial park, in 1997, both China and Singapore had serious differences of opinion, in 1999 the two sides agreed to by the Chinese to take over the new industrial park plan, In January 1, 2001 Suzhou local officials took over the industrial parks. in less than three years after signing the contract had serious disputes with the Chinese side. in the following year 1998, the Mengshengtuiyi. Is this a kind of 's successful investment model? This model of software such as investment and industrial development is for the Chinese to make those contributions?
Singapore’s often complacent repetition of Deng Xiaoping, brought the conversation: to learn from . Anthony Yuen of on July 8, 2004 expressed the view of the incident: 'The Chinese side has always been ... they feel the situation.. and being compatriots, broadly to Lee Kuan Yew, not only with added courtesy, but with added compliment, often called to learn "Singapore experience", Lee Kuan Yew has also often taken at face value, often to the Chinese officials to sell the "Singapore experience." In fact, the management of a 300 million people "company like" the experience of countries is difficult to migrate to a 9.6 million square kilometers, a country with a population of 1.3 billion, China's official kindly spoiled the Singaporeans'. In fact, Deng Xiaoping is only interested in the ''s social order and control is tight'. Deng Xiaoping saw in it bluntly, it’s only one-party dictatorship of SARS experience in democratic governance.
System is very difficult to turn once planted, not to mention 's national financial system is built on the basis of power politics, not of other government can or should learn about. GIC and Temasek having abundant funds, are often controlled so that the outside world has the wrong impression that this is the PAP government's successful performance. This is just an illusion, the truth will end this way.
In economics, where wealth can come from the creation and transfer; the former is to compete on price through market re-allocation of resources, which is the use of powers to make policy for planning the redistribution of resources. The former is entrepreneurial wealth, which is the extraction of wealth. In other words, the creation of wealth is the performance of economic behavior is the ability to transfer wealth is a political act of power performance.
The sale of government land, as an example: the sale of land in Hong Kong and all the proceeds paid to government spending, while in , all revenues derived from the sale of Crown land reserve. The results of two different policies, Hong Kong is taken from society by the society, is taken from society by the GIC? So, is the Hong Kong model or a model more in line with the definition of a democratic society?
In addition, many of 's land come from the Government's compulsory acquisition of low prices of people's land. In June 26, 2003 The Straits Times published a Land Acquisition News: Government to a mere 2 to 1 yuan acquisition of about 200 square meters of land, of which one for the permanent lease of the land. This is a typical case of land acquisition transfer of wealth;legal transfer procedures, not the land market price. People's Action Party government is squeezing entrepreneurs to get rich or is it to get rich? the government paid 1 yuan in cash just to satisfy the
In 1965, Lee Kuan Yew in , immediately after independence amends the Constitution, it must be a reasonable compensation for expropriation of the public to its original form. From 1965 to 2008, In 43 years, has the PAP government accumulated a number of reserve land sale? Obviously, this reserve is, in essence, the flesh and blood.
's model seems to represent a high efficiency of the outside world, the envy of the executive. So what then is the reality? 's Electronic Road Pricing system ‘front-office’ has been highly praised by the world. First of all, the idea is not a based but the original. Second, has succeeded in implementing the system, it simply reflects the strength of the government and the relationship between the people; in policy, people unable to resist the People's Action Party Government can do whatever they want. People's Action Party Government in the early 70s of the last century has begun to adopt this system. This is more than 30 years and the number of road tolls levied by the Government? The phenomenon of traffic congestion in , has there been little improvement? Today the phenomenon of road traffic congestion, or is it sustainable Changxin. Pricing is a traffic management or is it the state treasury revenue mechanism?
Does ’s land and transport system worthy of imitation in other developing countries?
model as portrayed in the main axis of the people and government relations,- public HDB and provident fund. This is not 's social welfare system and is not worthy of imitation. First of all, Lee Kuan Yew is very averse to social welfare system that is the greedy mentality of the poor, second, the relief is a waste of valuable resources. Third, Lee Kuan Yew also believe that unequal distribution of wealth in society can stimulate the poor to work hard to enhance economic development. It can be seen that the model is not an inclusive social space.
For the ordinary people of , the two most valuable industries are the HDB and provident fund. However, from an economic definition of property rights theory, private property and look at these so-called private ownership of industry, in essence, must belong to the public domain; of government industries. This is because the characteristics of HDB does not meet the definition of private property. There must be three conditions: free use of the right to freedom, of the right to assign, the right to freedom of earning.
From: T1,T2,T3 or Control Tower? (Conspiracy28) 2:57 am
To: ALL
22769.1
This interesting article first appeared on Temasek Review in mandarin.
I painstakingly translate for all to share.....
2009 model -where to go from here?
Is the Singapore model a clay Buddha across the river? Will the learning of the model reveals residual values?
has always been the media’s glorification of People's Action Party –the government being smart and capable. On November 30, 2008 in a report, a typical statement reads : 'China since reform, and opening up, many leaders have visited Singapore, but also draw on a number of well-established specific practices in Singapore. In recent years, quite a number of officials, academics, journalists, view the People's Action Party and Singapore's political model of great interest '. Clearly, the People's Action Party and its supporters believe the model is feasible and can be used as reference systems in other developing countries. Lee Kuan Yew in 2000, "From Third World to First World: The Story" is the account of Lee's successful experience.
However, the feasibility of the model as early as of years ago, western scholars have questioned. In 2008 Nobel Prize Winner for Economics, Krugman wrote that in 1994, an Economic Review had already rejected this so-called Asian economic miracle, and that Singapore's economic growth is due to foreign investment for growth rather than economic productivity gains. Similarly, the American political scientist Samuel Huntington has always been doubtful that 's political system can continue in the post-Lee Kuan Yew era. In fact, the government's economic policy is formulated by some to be rather than the conditions for success, so 's economic performance does not depend on to People's Action Party government policy.
What has the experience worth learning? 21 world-class networks in December 30, 2008 in an online article, "'s a good example" from a scholar's visit to National University of Singapore reported. Part of which reads: 'Singapore's impact on China ... China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park ... Singapore's sovereign investment funds and Temasek model ... For 30 years, Lee has stated ... for the Chinese Government’s sincerity and beliefs in his recommendations, ... China's most valuable is not the hardware but the software side, influenced Deng Xiaoping in this regard -, Deng Xiaoping said ‘we need to learn from , not just 's economy which is relatively developed, but also its good social order '.
The truth of the case? New is a complete failure in terms of experience. In 1994 the two sides agreed to develop the new industrial park, in 1997, both China and Singapore had serious differences of opinion, in 1999 the two sides agreed to by the Chinese to take over the new industrial park plan, In January 1, 2001 Suzhou local officials took over the industrial parks. in less than three years after signing the contract had serious disputes with the Chinese side. in the following year 1998, the Mengshengtuiyi. Is this a kind of 's successful investment model? This model of software such as investment and industrial development is for the Chinese to make those contributions?
Singapore’s often complacent repetition of Deng Xiaoping, brought the conversation: to learn from . Anthony Yuen of on July 8, 2004 expressed the view of the incident: 'The Chinese side has always been ... they feel the situation.. and being compatriots, broadly to Lee Kuan Yew, not only with added courtesy, but with added compliment, often called to learn "Singapore experience", Lee Kuan Yew has also often taken at face value, often to the Chinese officials to sell the "Singapore experience." In fact, the management of a 300 million people "company like" the experience of countries is difficult to migrate to a 9.6 million square kilometers, a country with a population of 1.3 billion, China's official kindly spoiled the Singaporeans'. In fact, Deng Xiaoping is only interested in the ''s social order and control is tight'. Deng Xiaoping saw in it bluntly, it’s only one-party dictatorship of SARS experience in democratic governance.
System is very difficult to turn once planted, not to mention 's national financial system is built on the basis of power politics, not of other government can or should learn about. GIC and Temasek having abundant funds, are often controlled so that the outside world has the wrong impression that this is the PAP government's successful performance. This is just an illusion, the truth will end this way.
In economics, where wealth can come from the creation and transfer; the former is to compete on price through market re-allocation of resources, which is the use of powers to make policy for planning the redistribution of resources. The former is entrepreneurial wealth, which is the extraction of wealth. In other words, the creation of wealth is the performance of economic behavior is the ability to transfer wealth is a political act of power performance.
The sale of government land, as an example: the sale of land in Hong Kong and all the proceeds paid to government spending, while in , all revenues derived from the sale of Crown land reserve. The results of two different policies, Hong Kong is taken from society by the society, is taken from society by the GIC? So, is the Hong Kong model or a model more in line with the definition of a democratic society?
In addition, many of 's land come from the Government's compulsory acquisition of low prices of people's land. In June 26, 2003 The Straits Times published a Land Acquisition News: Government to a mere 2 to 1 yuan acquisition of about 200 square meters of land, of which one for the permanent lease of the land. This is a typical case of land acquisition transfer of wealth;legal transfer procedures, not the land market price. People's Action Party government is squeezing entrepreneurs to get rich or is it to get rich? the government paid 1 yuan in cash just to satisfy the
In 1965, Lee Kuan Yew in , immediately after independence amends the Constitution, it must be a reasonable compensation for expropriation of the public to its original form. From 1965 to 2008, In 43 years, has the PAP government accumulated a number of reserve land sale? Obviously, this reserve is, in essence, the flesh and blood.
's model seems to represent a high efficiency of the outside world, the envy of the executive. So what then is the reality? 's Electronic Road Pricing system ‘front-office’ has been highly praised by the world. First of all, the idea is not a based but the original. Second, has succeeded in implementing the system, it simply reflects the strength of the government and the relationship between the people; in policy, people unable to resist the People's Action Party Government can do whatever they want. People's Action Party Government in the early 70s of the last century has begun to adopt this system. This is more than 30 years and the number of road tolls levied by the Government? The phenomenon of traffic congestion in , has there been little improvement? Today the phenomenon of road traffic congestion, or is it sustainable Changxin. Pricing is a traffic management or is it the state treasury revenue mechanism?
Does ’s land and transport system worthy of imitation in other developing countries?
model as portrayed in the main axis of the people and government relations,- public HDB and provident fund. This is not 's social welfare system and is not worthy of imitation. First of all, Lee Kuan Yew is very averse to social welfare system that is the greedy mentality of the poor, second, the relief is a waste of valuable resources. Third, Lee Kuan Yew also believe that unequal distribution of wealth in society can stimulate the poor to work hard to enhance economic development. It can be seen that the model is not an inclusive social space.
For the ordinary people of , the two most valuable industries are the HDB and provident fund. However, from an economic definition of property rights theory, private property and look at these so-called private ownership of industry, in essence, must belong to the public domain; of government industries. This is because the characteristics of HDB does not meet the definition of private property. There must be three conditions: free use of the right to freedom, of the right to assign, the right to freedom of earning.
