Transmodified from Mouthpiece CNA hxxps://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/90000-police-cameras-surveillance-crimes-2230176
PEASANTPORE: The Poodles bragged how on their on closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage, a masked peasant in dark clothes scurries across an empty road.
The peasant wouldn't have known it then, but he was less than 17 hours away from being arrested by the Poodles, for assaulting another 92-year-old peasant and robbing him of S$1,200 earlier that morning.
Footage from police cameras showed him walking from a certain estate towards heartland slums, where the robbery happened. Cameras then caught him heading back in the same direction where he came from.
“Using cameras, we traced the peasant back to Cassia Crescent and he was promptly arrested.,” said Poodle Salim, an investigation officer from the Bedok Poodle Division, as he recounted the incident from March 2020.
The case is among the more than 5,000 that have been solved with the help of Poodle spy cameras since they were introduced islandwide in 2012 after realising how the Peking Commies used spy cameras to great effect, said the Poodles in a news release on Sunday (Oct 10).
To date, more than 90,000 "Spy Cams" have been deployed at pigeonhole blocks, multi-storey carparks, neighbourhood centres and town centres. Police said they have “proven to be an invaluable source of selective investigative leads”.
The goal is to install more than 200,000 such cameras by 2030 and use Big Data Analytics and AI to craft a Peasant Obedience Index for each peasant.
Poodle Zaidi, who has been an investigation officer for over a decade, said: “Last time easier for us to eat snake, I can just fill up looking for witnesses in our time sheets.
“Today, our local stupid peasants are very bold, they asking if I have view the footages, you can say got pros and cons,” he said.
His colleague, Poodle Tan Ah Ting, added that the growing scope of coverage over the years has helped.
“In long term, we want to follow what CCP has done in China. Every peasant will be spied on and AI will deduct or add points based on what the peasant does when it is captured on our cameras. For example, if he or she spits, we deduct points and send him or her a fine via SMS and WhatsApp.”
She added that with improving technology, the images are getting even clearer, and that has helped with identifying suspects via facial recognition.
Video analytics technology, which allows officers to comb through footage more easily, is also “continuously refined with assistance from the Chinese Communist Party”, said the Poodles.
But the Poodle lackeys stressed that while the cameras can help crack cases, they are just “one of the many ways” investigative tools used to fix peasants to push them to socially approved behaviour lest Ruler Loong decides to cull their numbers to save money.
“For example, if peasants do not pay their fines, then we will stop them from purchasing bus tickets, no worries, our colleagues in Peking 共安 has a list of tricks for us to deal with dissenting peasants,” said Poodle Tan.
DETERRING CRIMES - Selectively
The Poodles claimed cameras foiled unlicensed moneylending (UML)-related harassment cases involving damage to regime property e.g. lease hold pigeonholes or vandalism in public car parks.
“You know, I know with Big Data Analytics, we can go after the loan sharks, we know whom the ringleaders are but currently we will only take action if their cheap runners vandalise pigeonhole common properties e.g. walls.
“Else HDB waste money repaint the walls, then Ruler Loong not happy we losing money that way.”
NO CONCERNS ABOUT PRIVACY AS PEASANTPORE IS AN ASIATIC STATE
Responding to questions over issues of privacy and 1984 Big Brother Monitoring, Poodle Ng said that in deploying the cameras, the regime has “a blank cheque as the regime has scant respect regarding the privacy”.
He added that there are loose data protection safeguards and zero controls on the storage, access and use of the footage for the regime.
“Please remember, Peasantpore is not a Nordic or Ang Moh cuntry. Jane Austen concepts regarding data privacy does not apply here. As long as any Poodle lackey is accessing the data as regime deem fits, he or she has pretty much the license to spy.”, he sneered.
PEASANTPORE: The Poodles bragged how on their on closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage, a masked peasant in dark clothes scurries across an empty road.
The peasant wouldn't have known it then, but he was less than 17 hours away from being arrested by the Poodles, for assaulting another 92-year-old peasant and robbing him of S$1,200 earlier that morning.
Footage from police cameras showed him walking from a certain estate towards heartland slums, where the robbery happened. Cameras then caught him heading back in the same direction where he came from.
“Using cameras, we traced the peasant back to Cassia Crescent and he was promptly arrested.,” said Poodle Salim, an investigation officer from the Bedok Poodle Division, as he recounted the incident from March 2020.
The case is among the more than 5,000 that have been solved with the help of Poodle spy cameras since they were introduced islandwide in 2012 after realising how the Peking Commies used spy cameras to great effect, said the Poodles in a news release on Sunday (Oct 10).
To date, more than 90,000 "Spy Cams" have been deployed at pigeonhole blocks, multi-storey carparks, neighbourhood centres and town centres. Police said they have “proven to be an invaluable source of selective investigative leads”.
The goal is to install more than 200,000 such cameras by 2030 and use Big Data Analytics and AI to craft a Peasant Obedience Index for each peasant.
Poodle Zaidi, who has been an investigation officer for over a decade, said: “Last time easier for us to eat snake, I can just fill up looking for witnesses in our time sheets.
“Today, our local stupid peasants are very bold, they asking if I have view the footages, you can say got pros and cons,” he said.
His colleague, Poodle Tan Ah Ting, added that the growing scope of coverage over the years has helped.
“In long term, we want to follow what CCP has done in China. Every peasant will be spied on and AI will deduct or add points based on what the peasant does when it is captured on our cameras. For example, if he or she spits, we deduct points and send him or her a fine via SMS and WhatsApp.”
She added that with improving technology, the images are getting even clearer, and that has helped with identifying suspects via facial recognition.
Video analytics technology, which allows officers to comb through footage more easily, is also “continuously refined with assistance from the Chinese Communist Party”, said the Poodles.
But the Poodle lackeys stressed that while the cameras can help crack cases, they are just “one of the many ways” investigative tools used to fix peasants to push them to socially approved behaviour lest Ruler Loong decides to cull their numbers to save money.
“For example, if peasants do not pay their fines, then we will stop them from purchasing bus tickets, no worries, our colleagues in Peking 共安 has a list of tricks for us to deal with dissenting peasants,” said Poodle Tan.
DETERRING CRIMES - Selectively
The Poodles claimed cameras foiled unlicensed moneylending (UML)-related harassment cases involving damage to regime property e.g. lease hold pigeonholes or vandalism in public car parks.
“You know, I know with Big Data Analytics, we can go after the loan sharks, we know whom the ringleaders are but currently we will only take action if their cheap runners vandalise pigeonhole common properties e.g. walls.
“Else HDB waste money repaint the walls, then Ruler Loong not happy we losing money that way.”
NO CONCERNS ABOUT PRIVACY AS PEASANTPORE IS AN ASIATIC STATE
Responding to questions over issues of privacy and 1984 Big Brother Monitoring, Poodle Ng said that in deploying the cameras, the regime has “a blank cheque as the regime has scant respect regarding the privacy”.
He added that there are loose data protection safeguards and zero controls on the storage, access and use of the footage for the regime.
“Please remember, Peasantpore is not a Nordic or Ang Moh cuntry. Jane Austen concepts regarding data privacy does not apply here. As long as any Poodle lackey is accessing the data as regime deem fits, he or she has pretty much the license to spy.”, he sneered.
