- Joined
- Jul 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,960
- Points
- 83
Dear Editor,
Citizens of our Nation were rocked by revelations of a ‘thwarted’ attack, which was supposed to have ‘occurred’ this year on the anniversary of the infamous “Christchurch” attack in March 2019.
Sketchy details of how a teenage Christian boy of Indian origin with super intelligence (wonder what his academic results are like) planned the purported attack, with intent to purchase ammunition (in Singapore for crying out loud), steal his father’s bank card (this one believable) and operate an electric powered vehicle (without a license) to carry out attacks on local mosques.
Sounds terrifying? Except we do not know if it is fact or fiction! The same can be said of all other detainees who were never produced in a Court of Law (in first world Singapore), where SPP candidate Osman Sulaiman even vouched for one of them asserting he is neither radicalised nor a terrorist.
In the event one has forgotten Jolovan Wham’s case of 2015, we revisit the words of Justice Woo Bih Li: “warnings are no more than an opinion of the relevant authority that the recipient has committed an offence. It does not bind the recipient, it does not and cannot amount to a legally binding pronouncement of guilt or finding of fact. Only a court of law has the power to make such a pronouncement or finding.” He furthermore went on to say: “that a court is not entitled to treat a warning as an antecedent or an aggravating factor for the purpose of sentencing a recipient who is subsequently convicted.”
Hence, in the absence of trial and evidence such a heinous incident took place, we can safely dismiss yesterday’s announcement as “fabrications of a PAP government”. This has been conclusively settled with the controversial detention of Ms Teo Soh Lung, Chng Suan Tze and others whose guilt the PAP government has never been able to establish to this day and restitutions were never made to right the wrongs perpetuated on them!
More at https://tinyurI.com/y2f4puyn
Citizens of our Nation were rocked by revelations of a ‘thwarted’ attack, which was supposed to have ‘occurred’ this year on the anniversary of the infamous “Christchurch” attack in March 2019.
Sketchy details of how a teenage Christian boy of Indian origin with super intelligence (wonder what his academic results are like) planned the purported attack, with intent to purchase ammunition (in Singapore for crying out loud), steal his father’s bank card (this one believable) and operate an electric powered vehicle (without a license) to carry out attacks on local mosques.
Sounds terrifying? Except we do not know if it is fact or fiction! The same can be said of all other detainees who were never produced in a Court of Law (in first world Singapore), where SPP candidate Osman Sulaiman even vouched for one of them asserting he is neither radicalised nor a terrorist.
In the event one has forgotten Jolovan Wham’s case of 2015, we revisit the words of Justice Woo Bih Li: “warnings are no more than an opinion of the relevant authority that the recipient has committed an offence. It does not bind the recipient, it does not and cannot amount to a legally binding pronouncement of guilt or finding of fact. Only a court of law has the power to make such a pronouncement or finding.” He furthermore went on to say: “that a court is not entitled to treat a warning as an antecedent or an aggravating factor for the purpose of sentencing a recipient who is subsequently convicted.”
Hence, in the absence of trial and evidence such a heinous incident took place, we can safely dismiss yesterday’s announcement as “fabrications of a PAP government”. This has been conclusively settled with the controversial detention of Ms Teo Soh Lung, Chng Suan Tze and others whose guilt the PAP government has never been able to establish to this day and restitutions were never made to right the wrongs perpetuated on them!
More at https://tinyurI.com/y2f4puyn
KNN
