• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

154th Leeporter Teaches U How to Choose Credit Card! For Fcuk?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Dec 28, 2008
SMALL CHANGE
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Play your cards right
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><TR>Do not settle for a standard card with standard benefits </TR><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Ignatius Low, Money Editor
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->
In the 10 years that I have worked at this newspaper, the question I have been most often asked is: How do I choose a credit card?
It may seem an inappropriate question these days when people are spending less, not more, in the face of recession.
But people use credit cards in good times and bad. And when times are tough, they want to get even more value-for-money from the cards that they sign up for.
Many people continue using the first card they signed up for when they started work, or the one their bank issued them free.
But with the credit card market as intensely competitive as it is, there is really no excuse for settling for a standard card with standard benefits.
The problem, of course, is that in Singapore, there is a mind-boggling array of cards to choose from - all toting their own long list of privileges and rewards.
How does one even start sifting through what's on offer?
The first thing I tell people is that to get the best deal, they need to start by looking at the cards that they are currently using.
If you are using a card that you signed up for more than five years ago, you are probably no longer getting the maximum benefit from it.
That's partly because of the economics of launching a credit card in today's market. A new card is only viable if there are enough sign-ups. And to entice enough customers to ramp up the numbers, banks always need the best rewards and privileges for the card's launch.
This is why many newly launched cards come with benefits and discounts that quietly expire after a year or two. Some customers notice and switch to even newer cards, but many others don't and keep using them even though the value proposition of these cards has fallen.
Okay, so assuming you are ready to sign up for a new card (or ditch your old one), how do you assess what's on offer?
A key question you need to ask yourself is whether you are the type of customer who can bother playing the 'rewards game'. That means keeping track of how many points you have and what you can redeem them for.
Some people just have no patience for this. For them, the best option is to go for cards that offer 'cashback' or cash rebates.
The concept is simple: The issuer gives you a fraction of what you spend back in cash. So you use your card, and at the end of each month or quarter, you get a cheque.
There is, of course, a price to pay for such convenience. The rebate rate is often very low and it's not uncommon to get several times what you would get in cashback schemes if you opt for a more traditional rewards programme.
So how do you get the best out of rewards programmes?
I like to think of it as an equation, with 'input' at one end and 'output' at the other.
You want to maximise both the 'input', which refers to how much you have to spend to earn the rewards points, as well as the 'output', which is what sort of rewards you get.
There are many cards now that give you double or triple points, which simply means you earn a reward two or three times as quickly.
A small number of cards give you double points on all spending. But once you get to higher multiples of points, the card issuer tends to limit either the stores that you can earn extra points from or the type of rewards you can claim.
I use a combination of two cards to maximise the 'input' of my equation.
The Citi Premier Miles card is where I put the bulk of my spending because it gives me triple points.
But because I buy books and CDs so often, I have a Citi Clear Platinum Visa, which gives me five times the points at all book and music retailers here.
This way, I reckon I'm earning points at least three times as fast as the average card user.
One of my friends, who puts all his corporate spending on his own credit card, is a classic case of someone who benefited dramatically from switching cards.
After he switched to a card that gave him triple points, he redeemed a business class flight to London in just eight months. Otherwise, it would have taken two years.
The 'output' side of the equation is more straightforward.
All good card issuers have top- notch rewards programmes with long lists of items and vouchers for which you can redeem using your points.
If you often shop at a particular retailer, say Ikea, it may be worth looking through different bank rewards catalogues and choosing a card that offers redemption vouchers there.
But I want to make special mention of redeeming air miles. This is topical as a number of cards were launched earlier this year that offered multiple points but restricted redemption of these points only to air miles.
Air miles, as a credit card reward, fell out of favour a few years ago with the advent of budget airlines. Cheaper flights meant that free flights redeemed with air miles became less desirable.
But higher fuel surcharges in recent times have made the price difference between traditional and budget flights less stark. And people have found they still prefer traditional flights for longer trips.
I myself have found air miles particularly invaluable for booking flights at the last minute, when prices are high in any case.
Whatever your preferences, my point is simply that you should spend some time looking at both the 'input' and 'output' sides of the equation. Don't just settle for the bog standard deal.
Of course, there are many other principles to abide by to get the most out of your credit cards.
It always pays to consolidate spending on one or two cards. With more points concentrated on one card, you can redeem a wider range of rewards. You also avoid paying unnecessary membership fees on duplicate cards you don't need.
Never roll over credit card debt to the next month unless it is absolutely necessary, because interest charges can add up. And keep a close eye on those payment deadlines to avoid fines and charges.
Any of this unnecessary expenditure will easily outweigh any benefit you might have earned from carefully husbanding your rewards and privileges.
But most of all, use credit cards wisely, especially in an economic downturn like this.
If you play your cards right, you can make them work a lot harder for you.
[email protected] <!-- end of for each --><!-- Current Ratings : start --><!-- Current Ratings : end --><!-- vbbintegration : start -->
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Dec 28, 2008
SMALL CHANGE
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Play your cards right
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><TR>Do not settle for a standard card with standard benefits </TR><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Ignatius Low, Money Editor
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->
In the 10 years that I have worked at this newspaper, the question I have been most often asked is: How do I choose a credit card?
It may seem an inappropriate question these days when people are spending less, not more, in the face of recession.
But people use credit cards in good times and bad. And when times are tough, they want to get even more value-for-money from the cards that they sign up for.
Many people continue using the first card they signed up for when they started work, or the one their bank issued them free.
But with the credit card market as intensely competitive as it is, there is really no excuse for settling for a standard card with standard benefits.
The problem, of course, is that in Singapore, there is a mind-boggling array of cards to choose from - all toting their own long list of privileges and rewards.
How does one even start sifting through what's on offer?
The first thing I tell people is that to get the best deal, they need to start by looking at the cards that they are currently using.
If you are using a card that you signed up for more than five years ago, you are probably no longer getting the maximum benefit from it.
That's partly because of the economics of launching a credit card in today's market. A new card is only viable if there are enough sign-ups. And to entice enough customers to ramp up the numbers, banks always need the best rewards and privileges for the card's launch.
This is why many newly launched cards come with benefits and discounts that quietly expire after a year or two. Some customers notice and switch to even newer cards, but many others don't and keep using them even though the value proposition of these cards has fallen.
Okay, so assuming you are ready to sign up for a new card (or ditch your old one), how do you assess what's on offer?
A key question you need to ask yourself is whether you are the type of customer who can bother playing the 'rewards game'. That means keeping track of how many points you have and what you can redeem them for.
Some people just have no patience for this. For them, the best option is to go for cards that offer 'cashback' or cash rebates.
The concept is simple: The issuer gives you a fraction of what you spend back in cash. So you use your card, and at the end of each month or quarter, you get a cheque.
There is, of course, a price to pay for such convenience. The rebate rate is often very low and it's not uncommon to get several times what you would get in cashback schemes if you opt for a more traditional rewards programme.
So how do you get the best out of rewards programmes?
I like to think of it as an equation, with 'input' at one end and 'output' at the other.
You want to maximise both the 'input', which refers to how much you have to spend to earn the rewards points, as well as the 'output', which is what sort of rewards you get.
There are many cards now that give you double or triple points, which simply means you earn a reward two or three times as quickly.
A small number of cards give you double points on all spending. But once you get to higher multiples of points, the card issuer tends to limit either the stores that you can earn extra points from or the type of rewards you can claim.
I use a combination of two cards to maximise the 'input' of my equation.
The Citi Premier Miles card is where I put the bulk of my spending because it gives me triple points.
But because I buy books and CDs so often, I have a Citi Clear Platinum Visa, which gives me five times the points at all book and music retailers here.
This way, I reckon I'm earning points at least three times as fast as the average card user.
One of my friends, who puts all his corporate spending on his own credit card, is a classic case of someone who benefited dramatically from switching cards.
After he switched to a card that gave him triple points, he redeemed a business class flight to London in just eight months. Otherwise, it would have taken two years.
The 'output' side of the equation is more straightforward.
All good card issuers have top- notch rewards programmes with long lists of items and vouchers for which you can redeem using your points.
If you often shop at a particular retailer, say Ikea, it may be worth looking through different bank rewards catalogues and choosing a card that offers redemption vouchers there.
But I want to make special mention of redeeming air miles. This is topical as a number of cards were launched earlier this year that offered multiple points but restricted redemption of these points only to air miles.
Air miles, as a credit card reward, fell out of favour a few years ago with the advent of budget airlines. Cheaper flights meant that free flights redeemed with air miles became less desirable.
But higher fuel surcharges in recent times have made the price difference between traditional and budget flights less stark. And people have found they still prefer traditional flights for longer trips.
I myself have found air miles particularly invaluable for booking flights at the last minute, when prices are high in any case.
Whatever your preferences, my point is simply that you should spend some time looking at both the 'input' and 'output' sides of the equation. Don't just settle for the bog standard deal.
Of course, there are many other principles to abide by to get the most out of your credit cards.
It always pays to consolidate spending on one or two cards. With more points concentrated on one card, you can redeem a wider range of rewards. You also avoid paying unnecessary membership fees on duplicate cards you don't need.
Never roll over credit card debt to the next month unless it is absolutely necessary, because interest charges can add up. And keep a close eye on those payment deadlines to avoid fines and charges.
Any of this unnecessary expenditure will easily outweigh any benefit you might have earned from carefully husbanding your rewards and privileges.
But most of all, use credit cards wisely, especially in an economic downturn like this.
If you play your cards right, you can make them work a lot harder for you.
[email protected] <!-- end of for each --><!-- Current Ratings : start --><!-- Current Ratings : end --><!-- vbbintegration : start -->
They are trying to encourage spending through CC and that is on CREDIT ! Why cant ST preach more on buying things in cash ?

I guess is that singkie is so cash poor, the next thing to tap on is your CCard in order to move the economy.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>Dec 28, 2008
ON WORDS
</TR><!-- headline one : start --><TR>Frugalistas to the fore in recession
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Janadas Devan, Review Editor
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->It is that time of the year. Inspired no doubt by Time magazine's brilliant advertising hook, the Man of the Year, various dictionaries and linguistic societies now have their 'Word of the Year'.
Merriam-Webster decided on 'bailout', based on the number of times the word was looked up on its online dictionary.
Global Language Monitor, which tracks words and phrases in the media, said 'change' came first, 'bailout' second and 'Obamamania' third. As for phrases, 'financial tsunami' was top, followed by 'global warming' and 'Yes, We Can'.
The New Oxford American Dictionary announced its editors' choice last month, even before the year was out: 'hypermiling', defined as 'the attempt to maximise gas mileage by making fuel-conserving adjustments to one's car and one's driving techniques'.
If you never exceed the speed limit, diligently keep your tyres properly inflated, turn off the engine in a jam, remove roof racks or excess baggage in the boot to reduce drag and drive shoeless so as to be able to feel the gas-pedal sensitively, you are a 'hypermiler'.
The choice of the editors of Webster's New World Dictionary was 'overshare', a verb meaning 'to divulge excessive personal information, as in a blog or broadcast interview, prompting reactions ranging from alarmed discomfort to approval'.
Neither choice is particularly inspired. 'Oversharing', far from being a new affliction peculiar to the Internet age, is a rather old fault. We used to call 'oversharers' gossips or bores. They used to sit around in coffee shops divulging excessive personal information; now, they do it on Facebook. What's the difference? Surely, we don't need a neologism to describe what is after all a perennial human failing.
As for 'hypermiling', it is, as The New York Times' William Safire notes, 'news-specific' - and like all nonce words, it has become outdated within a year of its appearance.
'What the vocabulary needs when gas is an astronomical US$4 a gallon is far from the same when the price at the pump falls back to a more earthly US$2.'
Hypermiling will no longer suffice to wean us from the internal combustion engine; when petrol is cheap, being ERPeed might work better.
(The New Oxford seems to have a fondness for 'green' words. Its 2007 choice was 'locavore', the practice of 'using locally grown ingredients, taking advantage of seasonally available foodstuffs that can be brought and prepared without the need for extra preservatives'. Oxford University Press thought the word was significant because it brought together 'eating and ecology in a new way'.
Actually, as in the case with oversharing, locavoring is not particularly new. Homo Sapiens have been locavores for about 95 per cent of their existence on Earth. They weren't importing avocados from Mexico in Mesopotamia, circa 3,000 BC, or in Africa 200,000 years ago.)
Strangely enough, the runners- up in both New Oxford's and Webster's list of top words were better than the winners. Webster's had 'leisure sickness' among its top five selection - 'a purported syndrome, not universally recognised by psychologists, by which some people (typically characterised as workaholics) are more likely to report feeling ill during weekends and vacations than when working'.
And New Oxford had among its finalists 'frugalista' and 'toxic debt'. These are all words that would have fitted the post-Lehman zeitgeist better.
It is obvious why 'toxic debt' would. That is a buzz phrase that, alas, is going to keep buzzing for some time. 'Leisure sickness' seems an apt phrase to describe the enforced leisure of unemployment or under-employment.
And 'frugalista' - 'a person who leads a frugal lifestyle, but stays fashionable and healthy by swapping clothes, buying second-hand, growing own produce, etc' - might actually catch in a way 'hypermiling' and 'locavore' have not.
'Frugalista', as Mr Safire reminds us, plays on - and reverses - 'fashionista', a buzz word of the roaring 1990s. Ista is the Spanish version of the English suffix 'ist' used to denote an adherent of a system (socialist, capitalist), a member of a profession (economist, journalist), a person who uses a particular thing (violinist, cyclist), and so on.
And as for 'frugal', it comes from the Latin frugalis, the root of which, frug means 'fruit'. It was first applied in English to the sparing or economical apportionment of food in the 16th century, when fruits were considered cheap, MrSafire explains, and later became a metaphor to mean 'sparingly supplied, thrifty' in all respects.
Frui, 'enjoy'; fructus, 'enjoyment'; fruitio(n), 'realisation of a plan'; and 'frugal' are all fortuitously and fruitfully linked. What better title can there be than 'frugalista' - an adherent of a system that seeks fructus in the fruition of frugality - to define the moral universe of the new dispensation that is descending on us?
We all have to be frugalistas in our habits. We all have to be frugalistas in our material aspirations. We all have to discover, as our forefathers did, that there is a moral and spiritual connection - not to mention, an economic one too, as we are learning in this crisis - between frugality and fruition.
Happy New Year. [email protected]
 
Top